(Message from Rebecca Glasscock)
Dear Citizens of the Bluegrass Region:
As part of Lexington's Second Annual Peace and Global Citizenship Fair (coming up on May 19th from noon until 8:00 p.m. at the Cooper Campus), the Peace and Justice Coalition is hosting a "Creating a Culture of Peace Essay Contest." Thanks to contributions from several citizens in the community, $50 prizes will be awarded to the two best entries. The essay contest is open to all adults, 18 years of age and older, who live in the counties of the Bluegrass. Attached to this message is some background information and the entry form. Please email me if you have questions.
We are also sponsoring a Children for Peace Art Contest, open to children in grades K-12. I have attached that form as well, in case you know of children who might be interested in participating.
Creating a Culture of Peace
2007 Call for Essays
Invitation to Participate
Bluegrass Community and Technical College’s Peace and Justice Coalition, in connection with the May 19, 2007 Second Annual Peace and Global Citizenship Fair, is sponsoring an essay contest.
All adults, 18 years of age and up who live in the Bluegrass of Kentucky are eligible to participate. In 1000 words or less, articulate your vision of how we can create a culture of peace in Lexington and the Bluegrass of Kentucky.
The United Nations defines a Culture of Peace as “a set of values, attitudes, modes of behavior and ways of life that reject violence and prevent conflicts by tackling their root causes to solve problems through dialogue and negotiation among individuals, groups and nations (UN Resolutions A/RES/52/13 : Culture of Peace and A/RES/53/243, Declaration and Programme of Action on a Culture of Peace). For peace and non-violence to prevail, we need to: foster a culture of peace through education; promote sustainable economic and social development; promote respect for all human rights; ensure equality between women and men; foster democratic participation; advance understanding, tolerance and solidarity; support participatory communication and the free flow of information and knowledge; and promote international peace and security.”
Please complete the entry form printed on the back of this information sheet. Entries will be accepted at Bluegrass Community and Technical College between April 1st and April 15th. Two $50 prizes will be awarded and the entries will be displayed on May 19th, during the Second Annual Peace and Global Citizenship Fair, at the BCTC campus (directly north of Commonwealth Stadium in Lexington). The best essays will be displayed publicly and recognized with the winning entries sent to the newspaper for publication.
If you have any questions about this contest, please contact Rebecca Glasscock, Associate Professor of Geography and faculty advisor for the Peace and Justice Coalition. Her email address is rebecca.glasscock@kctcs.edu and her telephone number is (859) 246-6319.
We thank the Shambhala Center of Lexington and several community-minded citizens for their support of this contest.
Creating a Culture of Peace:
2007 Essay Entry Form
Name: _____________________________________
Address: __________________________________
Telephone number __________________________
Email address:_____________________________
Are you 18 years of age or older? _________
Title of your essay: ____________________
Deliver or mail entry to Peace & Justice Coalition, Bluegrass Community and Technical College, 221 Moloney Building, 470 Cooper Drive, Lexington, KY 40506. For pick-up at your school, call (859) 246-6319.
Entries will be accepted from April 1-15, 2007.
Children for Peace 2007
Art for Peace Contest
Invitation to Participate
Bluegrass Community and Technical College’s Peace and Justice Coalition, in connection with the May 19, 2007 Second Annual Peace and Global Citizenship Fair, is sponsoring an art for peace contest.
All K-12 students living in the Bluegrass of Kentucky are eligible to participate. Using pastels, crayons, pen and ink, acrylics, oil, charcoal, or watercolors, students are invited to draw or paint a picture of the peaceful world in which he or she wants to live.
Entries will be accepted at Bluegrass Community and Technical College between April 1st and April 15th. If pick-up is needed, please call Rebecca Glasscock.
Four $25 prizes will be awarded: one for grades K-2, one for grades 3-5, one for grades 6-8, and one for grades 9-12. Commemorative ribbons will be awarded. All entries will be displayed on May 19th, during the Second Annual Peace and Global Citizenship Fair, at the BCTC campus (directly north of Commonwealth Stadium in Lexington). After the event, these creative works of peace and hope for the future will form a collage for the 2008 Bluegrass Peace Calendar.
If you have any questions about this contest, please contact Rebecca Glasscock, Associate Professor of Geography and faculty advisor for the Peace and Justice Coalition. Her email address is rebecca.glasscock@kctcs.edu and her telephone number is (859) 246-6319.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Children for Peace 2007
Entry for “Art for Peace” Contest
Name: _____________________________________
School: _______________________________
Title of entry: ___________________________
Grade: ______________ Age: ________________
Contact information (telephone number, email, or mailing address): ___________________________
Deliver or mail entry to Peace & Justice Coalition, Bluegrass Community and Technical College, 221 Moloney Building, 470 Cooper Drive, Lexington, KY 40506. For pick-up at your school, call (859) 246-6319.
Entries will be accepted from April 1-15, 2007.
Monday, March 19, 2007
Tara Lohan: As Iraq Casualties Mount, So Do the Stories We Must Tell
(From Robert Greenwald and Brave New Films one of the most important new online sites is the Iraq Veterans Memorial. On the 4th Anniversary of the Iraq War, in remembrance, listen to the stories of those who mourn the casualties of the Iraq War.)
As Iraq Casualties Mount, So Do the Stories We Must Tell
By Tara Lohan
AlterNet
Spc. Jamaal Addison's mother describes him as an angel. He died on the fourth day of the Iraq war at the age of 22. "He was a hero," she said. "But he was a hero long before he ever got killed in this war."
Her words could also speak for the thousands of others killed in the invasion and occupation of Iraq that began four years ago today. Jamaal's story is one of many captured by a new, on-line video project called Iraq Veterans Memorial -- the latest from director Robert Greenwald and the folks at Brave New Films.
"While making Iraq for Sale, we were inspired and moved by the soldiers we interviewed. They were young, very smart and extremely patriotic. When we realized the fourth anniversary of the war was approaching we wanted to do something to honor people like them who were not lucky enough to return home," said Tracy Fleischman of Brave New Films.
"We were inspired by the Vietnam Memorial and the AIDS quilt -- which both bring tremendous loss of life to a human scale. We decided to use our medium -- film -- to create something similar. It was also important to us that politics not be a part of this project; we simply wanted to honor these young men and women and create something people with varying opinions could come together around."
The videos provide a human face, not just of those who have been killed, but of the people they left behind -- brothers and sisters, parents, children, friends, lovers, cousins, comrades. The men and women who were killed were more than service members -- in the words of those who loved them -- they were leaders, ambassadors, peacemakers, superheroes, poets, artists, athletes, dreamers, and jokers.
"By watching the videos, you will have the opportunity to learn about these heroes from those who knew them best -- their family, friends, and fellow servicemembers. Each man and woman represented in the memorial had attributes and qualities that made them unique, but they all have one thing in common -- they were truly loved and are deeply missed," wrote Jim Miller of Brave New Foundation.
"There are many other people who have died during the Iraq War -- contractors, Iraqis, servicemembers from other countries -- and many who have been critically wounded. Many heroes have also died and been wounded in Afghanistan. We honor all of these people and their families for the sacrifices that have been made."
Each day the list of casualties from Iraq grows and so do the number of stories that we need to hear about those lost lives. Lt. Kenneth Michael Ballard was 26 when he was killed in Iraq. He was an only child. "Ken will always be the brightest star in my darkest night," his mother said.
Staff Sgt. Paul M. Neff II was 30 when he was killed. His sister Dawn remembers him:
Lt. Seth J. Dvorin was 24. He was married and wanted to have children. PFC Steven F. Sirko was 20 and had "eyes that laugh."
Cpl. Jeffrey Michael Lucey hung himself in his family's home after returning from Iraq. He was 23 and his best friend was his sister Debra.
Cpl. Nicholas Ziolkowski was 22 when he was killed. "I think Nick, it's such a loss, certainly to me personally but would have much such a difference had he lived because he was that kind of person," said his mother.
These are only a few of the thousands of stories that should be heard and shared and remembered. Four years after the invasion, we are still a country at war. The Iraq Veterans Memorial is a glimpse of what the world has lost.
"We hope that the memorial gives people reason to stop for a moment, forget the politics surrounding the war, and honor the memory of the brave young men and women we've lost," said Fleischman.
Host the videos on your website, include them in your candlelight vigils, listen to them on your iPod, or contribute one of your own stories about someone you've loved.
Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.
© 2007 Independent Media Institute.
Link to the Article
Learn how you can put this on your website, to download it to burn on a dvd, or put it on your IPod or computer
Also, we must remember the lives lost by Iraqis as a result of this war:
Iraq: The Hidden Story
As Iraq Casualties Mount, So Do the Stories We Must Tell
By Tara Lohan
AlterNet
Spc. Jamaal Addison's mother describes him as an angel. He died on the fourth day of the Iraq war at the age of 22. "He was a hero," she said. "But he was a hero long before he ever got killed in this war."
Her words could also speak for the thousands of others killed in the invasion and occupation of Iraq that began four years ago today. Jamaal's story is one of many captured by a new, on-line video project called Iraq Veterans Memorial -- the latest from director Robert Greenwald and the folks at Brave New Films.
"While making Iraq for Sale, we were inspired and moved by the soldiers we interviewed. They were young, very smart and extremely patriotic. When we realized the fourth anniversary of the war was approaching we wanted to do something to honor people like them who were not lucky enough to return home," said Tracy Fleischman of Brave New Films.
"We were inspired by the Vietnam Memorial and the AIDS quilt -- which both bring tremendous loss of life to a human scale. We decided to use our medium -- film -- to create something similar. It was also important to us that politics not be a part of this project; we simply wanted to honor these young men and women and create something people with varying opinions could come together around."
The videos provide a human face, not just of those who have been killed, but of the people they left behind -- brothers and sisters, parents, children, friends, lovers, cousins, comrades. The men and women who were killed were more than service members -- in the words of those who loved them -- they were leaders, ambassadors, peacemakers, superheroes, poets, artists, athletes, dreamers, and jokers.
"By watching the videos, you will have the opportunity to learn about these heroes from those who knew them best -- their family, friends, and fellow servicemembers. Each man and woman represented in the memorial had attributes and qualities that made them unique, but they all have one thing in common -- they were truly loved and are deeply missed," wrote Jim Miller of Brave New Foundation.
"There are many other people who have died during the Iraq War -- contractors, Iraqis, servicemembers from other countries -- and many who have been critically wounded. Many heroes have also died and been wounded in Afghanistan. We honor all of these people and their families for the sacrifices that have been made."
Each day the list of casualties from Iraq grows and so do the number of stories that we need to hear about those lost lives. Lt. Kenneth Michael Ballard was 26 when he was killed in Iraq. He was an only child. "Ken will always be the brightest star in my darkest night," his mother said.
Staff Sgt. Paul M. Neff II was 30 when he was killed. His sister Dawn remembers him:
My brother was more than just a name etched in cold stone. And he wasn't just my brother. He was our father's best friend. He was our mother's baby boy. He was a single father and he was part of a band of brothers ...
The day I heard the news, his helicopter was shot down, I knew he was on it before the call came. There was an instant void. He died doing what he loved. There is some comfort knowing that. The thing that most people remember about Paul is how much he loved life and his infectious smile.
Without Paul in this world, the sun just doesn't shine as bright. He is desperately missed by his family, his friends and most of all his son.
Lt. Seth J. Dvorin was 24. He was married and wanted to have children. PFC Steven F. Sirko was 20 and had "eyes that laugh."
Cpl. Jeffrey Michael Lucey hung himself in his family's home after returning from Iraq. He was 23 and his best friend was his sister Debra.
Cpl. Nicholas Ziolkowski was 22 when he was killed. "I think Nick, it's such a loss, certainly to me personally but would have much such a difference had he lived because he was that kind of person," said his mother.
These are only a few of the thousands of stories that should be heard and shared and remembered. Four years after the invasion, we are still a country at war. The Iraq Veterans Memorial is a glimpse of what the world has lost.
"We hope that the memorial gives people reason to stop for a moment, forget the politics surrounding the war, and honor the memory of the brave young men and women we've lost," said Fleischman.
Host the videos on your website, include them in your candlelight vigils, listen to them on your iPod, or contribute one of your own stories about someone you've loved.
Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.
© 2007 Independent Media Institute.
Link to the Article
Learn how you can put this on your website, to download it to burn on a dvd, or put it on your IPod or computer
Also, we must remember the lives lost by Iraqis as a result of this war:
Iraq: The Hidden Story
Sunday, March 18, 2007
The Departed (Martin Scorsese: 2006)
"Honesty is not synonymous with the truth."
Madolyn, the psychiatrist for the Boston police force, to Billy Costigan, undercover state policeman.
Madolyn, the psychiatrist for the Boston police force, to Billy Costigan, undercover state policeman.
Chimera
chimera \kye-MEER-uh\ noun
1 : an imaginary monster compounded of incongruous parts
*2 : an illusion or fabrication of the mind; especially : an unrealizable dream
Example sentence:
Jared decided to leave the company upon realizing that his hopes for advancement were merely a chimera.
Did you know?
In Greek mythology, the Chimera was a fearsome, fire-breathing monster with a lion's head, a goat's body, and a dragon's tail. She terrorized the people of Lycia until their king, Iobates, asked the hero Bellerophon to slay her. Iobates had an ulterior motive; his son-in-law wanted Bellerophon killed and the king was sure the Chimera would do the job. But Bellerophon called in Pegasus, the winged horse, and brought the Chimera down from above. The beast lived on in people's imaginations, and English speakers adopted her name for any similarly grotesque monster, or, later, for anything fanciful.
1 : an imaginary monster compounded of incongruous parts
*2 : an illusion or fabrication of the mind; especially : an unrealizable dream
Example sentence:
Jared decided to leave the company upon realizing that his hopes for advancement were merely a chimera.
Did you know?
In Greek mythology, the Chimera was a fearsome, fire-breathing monster with a lion's head, a goat's body, and a dragon's tail. She terrorized the people of Lycia until their king, Iobates, asked the hero Bellerophon to slay her. Iobates had an ulterior motive; his son-in-law wanted Bellerophon killed and the king was sure the Chimera would do the job. But Bellerophon called in Pegasus, the winged horse, and brought the Chimera down from above. The beast lived on in people's imaginations, and English speakers adopted her name for any similarly grotesque monster, or, later, for anything fanciful.
Crit Luallen: Tuition increases place higher education goals in jeopardy
Tuition increases place higher education goals in jeopardy
by Crit Luallen
Business Lexington
Tuition increases have placed in jeopardy Kentucky's ability to meet the 2020 postsecondary education goals of the historic Higher Education Reform Act of 1997. This was the key finding in a study recently released by the Kentucky State Auditor's Office. The report is a call to arms for anyone who wants to play a leadership role in Kentucky's future. And every citizen should play a role. During this key election year, Kentuckians must demand that those who wish to lead Kentucky develop and present strategies to reverse this troubling trend.
As in-state tuition has steadily increased, the full-time, undergraduate enrollment of Kentucky residents in the postsecondary education system has begun to decrease. Since the 2002 - 2003 school year, when general fund support decreased and tuition increases escalated, the average cost of tuition in Kentucky's four-year universities has increased by 66 percent, an average of 13.5 percent a year.
At the same time, a national study on affordability lowered Kentucky's grade from a "B" to an "F." That study also found that lower income households must expend 43 percent of their total income for a student enrolled in higher education.
Kentucky saw significant increases in enrollment after the 1997 reforms. But recently, as tuition has risen dramatically, full-time undergraduate resident enrollment at the four-year institutions has slowed and leveled off, increasing by only 92 students last year. When you combine the two- and four-year systems, Kentucky has actually lost 1,339 full-time Kentucky students since 2004.
Normally enrollment reports focus on the total headcount of the school or system. Our report focused on full-time students and includes a breakdown of each school and the Kentucky Community and Technical College System. However, the data shows that part-time students have also declined in the four-year institutions. And the growth of part-time students has slowed in the Kentucky Community and Technical College System.
This is happening at a time when the Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Education project says that between 2000 and 2020 Kentucky needs to add 389,000 new bachelor's degree holders to reach the national average. The council estimates that if Kentucky continues to perform at its current level, without further declines, the state will fall short of its 2020 goals by 211,000 bachelor's degree holders.
Our report also found that in the ten years since reform, Kentucky has been more successful in attracting non-resident students to Kentucky's eight four-year public universities than enrolling Kentuckians. While Kentucky resident enrollment increased by 10 percent, non-resident growth increased by 39 percent. In fact, 45 percent of the growth in full time undergraduate students since the 1997 reforms can be attributed to out-of-state students. Since the fall of 2003, Kentucky has attracted more non-resident full time students, 56 percent of the total new enrollees, than resident students. Low non-resident tuition rates may be contributing to this disparity.
Higher educational attainment for Kentucky's citizens is the single biggest challenge facing the commonwealth. By any measure, more Kentuckians must have postsecondary degrees if we are to attract the jobs of the 21st century and increase the quality of life for our residents.
This analysis points to the urgent need for a comprehensive review of the linkages between state appropriations, tuition policy and financial aid. Decisions affecting tuition occur at several different levels. All actions by the key players - the General Assembly, Executive Branch, Council for Postsecondary Education, the Universities and the Kentucky Community and Technical College System - are interrelated, and impact Kentuckians' ability to reach the educational attainment needed to move the state forward.
Certainly, administrators must continue to look for efficiencies within the postsecondary educational system. But it is vital that Kentucky's top policy makers provide adequate funding to ensure that tuition is set at a level that makes postsecondary education accessible to all residents.
The report recommends that tuition be reduced and that need-based financial aid be increased. We also recommend that non-resident tuition should be fair to state taxpayers. Additionally, we recommend that state budget decisions should take into account data quantifying the impact of those decisions on tuition and accessibility.
The issue of higher education has been a focal point of many studies and recommendations recently. The Council on Postsecondary Education says more out-of-state students are staying in Kentucky after graduation. That is a positive development. We should encourage non-Kentucky residents to come to college in our state - as long as it is not at the expense of Kentucky taxpayers.
I sent a copy of this report to every legislator, the governor and to each candidate for governor. The data calls for urgent and dramatic action. It simply must be a top priority of policy makers in Kentucky to make postsecondary education affordable for Kentuckians. Hopefully this report can make this critical problem, already at a crisis point, a top issue this year and in the next budget session.
Crit Luallen is Kentucky State Auditor.
by Crit Luallen
Business Lexington
Tuition increases have placed in jeopardy Kentucky's ability to meet the 2020 postsecondary education goals of the historic Higher Education Reform Act of 1997. This was the key finding in a study recently released by the Kentucky State Auditor's Office. The report is a call to arms for anyone who wants to play a leadership role in Kentucky's future. And every citizen should play a role. During this key election year, Kentuckians must demand that those who wish to lead Kentucky develop and present strategies to reverse this troubling trend.
As in-state tuition has steadily increased, the full-time, undergraduate enrollment of Kentucky residents in the postsecondary education system has begun to decrease. Since the 2002 - 2003 school year, when general fund support decreased and tuition increases escalated, the average cost of tuition in Kentucky's four-year universities has increased by 66 percent, an average of 13.5 percent a year.
At the same time, a national study on affordability lowered Kentucky's grade from a "B" to an "F." That study also found that lower income households must expend 43 percent of their total income for a student enrolled in higher education.
Kentucky saw significant increases in enrollment after the 1997 reforms. But recently, as tuition has risen dramatically, full-time undergraduate resident enrollment at the four-year institutions has slowed and leveled off, increasing by only 92 students last year. When you combine the two- and four-year systems, Kentucky has actually lost 1,339 full-time Kentucky students since 2004.
Normally enrollment reports focus on the total headcount of the school or system. Our report focused on full-time students and includes a breakdown of each school and the Kentucky Community and Technical College System. However, the data shows that part-time students have also declined in the four-year institutions. And the growth of part-time students has slowed in the Kentucky Community and Technical College System.
This is happening at a time when the Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Education project says that between 2000 and 2020 Kentucky needs to add 389,000 new bachelor's degree holders to reach the national average. The council estimates that if Kentucky continues to perform at its current level, without further declines, the state will fall short of its 2020 goals by 211,000 bachelor's degree holders.
Our report also found that in the ten years since reform, Kentucky has been more successful in attracting non-resident students to Kentucky's eight four-year public universities than enrolling Kentuckians. While Kentucky resident enrollment increased by 10 percent, non-resident growth increased by 39 percent. In fact, 45 percent of the growth in full time undergraduate students since the 1997 reforms can be attributed to out-of-state students. Since the fall of 2003, Kentucky has attracted more non-resident full time students, 56 percent of the total new enrollees, than resident students. Low non-resident tuition rates may be contributing to this disparity.
Higher educational attainment for Kentucky's citizens is the single biggest challenge facing the commonwealth. By any measure, more Kentuckians must have postsecondary degrees if we are to attract the jobs of the 21st century and increase the quality of life for our residents.
This analysis points to the urgent need for a comprehensive review of the linkages between state appropriations, tuition policy and financial aid. Decisions affecting tuition occur at several different levels. All actions by the key players - the General Assembly, Executive Branch, Council for Postsecondary Education, the Universities and the Kentucky Community and Technical College System - are interrelated, and impact Kentuckians' ability to reach the educational attainment needed to move the state forward.
Certainly, administrators must continue to look for efficiencies within the postsecondary educational system. But it is vital that Kentucky's top policy makers provide adequate funding to ensure that tuition is set at a level that makes postsecondary education accessible to all residents.
The report recommends that tuition be reduced and that need-based financial aid be increased. We also recommend that non-resident tuition should be fair to state taxpayers. Additionally, we recommend that state budget decisions should take into account data quantifying the impact of those decisions on tuition and accessibility.
The issue of higher education has been a focal point of many studies and recommendations recently. The Council on Postsecondary Education says more out-of-state students are staying in Kentucky after graduation. That is a positive development. We should encourage non-Kentucky residents to come to college in our state - as long as it is not at the expense of Kentucky taxpayers.
I sent a copy of this report to every legislator, the governor and to each candidate for governor. The data calls for urgent and dramatic action. It simply must be a top priority of policy makers in Kentucky to make postsecondary education affordable for Kentuckians. Hopefully this report can make this critical problem, already at a crisis point, a top issue this year and in the next budget session.
Crit Luallen is Kentucky State Auditor.
Annual Minx Auerbach Lecture in Women's & Gender Studies: Katha Pollitt--"Are We There Yet? Why Women Aren't Equal Even if We Think We Are"
(Courtesy of Virginia Blum)
Annual Minx Auerbach Lecture in Women's & Gender Studies
Katha Pollitt
"Are We There Yet? Why Women Aren't Equal Even if We Think We Are"
Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:30 PM
Speed Museum Auditorium
University of Louisville
Reception following lecture. This event is co-sponsored by the Offices of the President and Provost,the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences,and the Commonwealth Genter forHumanities and Society. Free and open to the pubElcPaid Parking is available in the Speed Museum Garage. If you need further information or require any accommodations in orderto participate fully in this event, please call 852-8160 or e-mail: Hrnancyt @ louisville.edu.
Katha Pollitt's column, "Subject to Debate,"appears regularly in The Nation and is frequently reprinted. Her writing often focuses on gender issues, especially as they relate to povefty, civil liberties and the"culture wars." Her recent book, Virginity or Death, reflects her interest in the politics ofgender in the U.S., following her earlier collection of essays, Reasonable Creatures: Essays on Women and Feminism (1994). Pollitt has won the National Magazine Award, the Whiting Foundation Writing Award, and the Maggie Award from the Planned Parenthood Federation of America for her essay "Why Do We Romanticize the Fetus?" Pollitt has also received a National Endowment for the Arts grant and a Guggenheim Fellowship for her poetry,which has appeared in The New Yorker and The Atlantic.
Annual Minx Auerbach Lecture in Women's & Gender Studies
Katha Pollitt
"Are We There Yet? Why Women Aren't Equal Even if We Think We Are"
Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:30 PM
Speed Museum Auditorium
University of Louisville
Reception following lecture. This event is co-sponsored by the Offices of the President and Provost,the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences,and the Commonwealth Genter forHumanities and Society. Free and open to the pubElcPaid Parking is available in the Speed Museum Garage. If you need further information or require any accommodations in orderto participate fully in this event, please call 852-8160 or e-mail: Hrnancyt @ louisville.edu.
Katha Pollitt's column, "Subject to Debate,"appears regularly in The Nation and is frequently reprinted. Her writing often focuses on gender issues, especially as they relate to povefty, civil liberties and the"culture wars." Her recent book, Virginity or Death, reflects her interest in the politics ofgender in the U.S., following her earlier collection of essays, Reasonable Creatures: Essays on Women and Feminism (1994). Pollitt has won the National Magazine Award, the Whiting Foundation Writing Award, and the Maggie Award from the Planned Parenthood Federation of America for her essay "Why Do We Romanticize the Fetus?" Pollitt has also received a National Endowment for the Arts grant and a Guggenheim Fellowship for her poetry,which has appeared in The New Yorker and The Atlantic.
Supertramp--If Everyone Was Listening
My song of the day... working in my office on the last day of Spring Break:
Supertramp - "If Everyone Was Listening"
The actors and jesters are here
The stage is in darkness and clear
For raising the curtain and no-one's quite certain
Whose play it is
How long ago, how long?
If only we had listened then
If we'd know just how right
We were going to be
For we dreamed a lot
And we schemed a lot
And we tried to sing of love before
The stage fell apart
(chorus)
If everyone was listening, you know
There'd be a chance that we could save the show
Who'll be the last clown to bring the house down?
Oh no, please no, don't let the curtain fall
Well, what is your costume today?
Who are the props in your play?
You're acting apart which you thought
From the start was an honest one
Well, how do you plead?
An actor indeed! Go re-learn your lines
You don't know what you've done
The final is begun:
(chorus)
If everyone was listening, you know
There'd be a chance that we could save the show
Who'll be the last clown to bring the house down?
Oh no, please no, don't let the curtain fall
Supertramp - "If Everyone Was Listening"
The actors and jesters are here
The stage is in darkness and clear
For raising the curtain and no-one's quite certain
Whose play it is
How long ago, how long?
If only we had listened then
If we'd know just how right
We were going to be
For we dreamed a lot
And we schemed a lot
And we tried to sing of love before
The stage fell apart
(chorus)
If everyone was listening, you know
There'd be a chance that we could save the show
Who'll be the last clown to bring the house down?
Oh no, please no, don't let the curtain fall
Well, what is your costume today?
Who are the props in your play?
You're acting apart which you thought
From the start was an honest one
Well, how do you plead?
An actor indeed! Go re-learn your lines
You don't know what you've done
The final is begun:
(chorus)
If everyone was listening, you know
There'd be a chance that we could save the show
Who'll be the last clown to bring the house down?
Oh no, please no, don't let the curtain fall
The First Annual Anne Braden Memorial Lecture: Julian Bond--2007: A Race Odyssey
(Courtesy of Virginia Blum)
The First Annual Anne Braden Memorial Lecture
Julian Bond
"2007: A Race Odyssey"
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
5:30pm
Brown & Williamson Club at Papa John's Cardinal Stadium
Louisiville, KY
Julian Bond
Chair of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People)
One of the founders of SNCC (Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee) and the Atlanta sit-in movement
4-Term Georgia State Representative and 6-Term Georgia State Senator
Professor of History at the University of Virginia
Sponsored by the Anne Braden Institute for Social Justice Research
The First Annual Anne Braden Memorial Lecture
Julian Bond
"2007: A Race Odyssey"
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
5:30pm
Brown & Williamson Club at Papa John's Cardinal Stadium
Louisiville, KY
Julian Bond
Chair of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People)
One of the founders of SNCC (Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee) and the Atlanta sit-in movement
4-Term Georgia State Representative and 6-Term Georgia State Senator
Professor of History at the University of Virginia
Sponsored by the Anne Braden Institute for Social Justice Research
Stephen Zunes: The Failures of Democratization
Iraq: The Failures of Democratization
by Stephen Zunes
Foreign Policy In Focus
The failures of Iraqi democratization as advocated by the Bush administration should not be blamed primarily on the Iraqis. Nor should they be used to reinforce racist notions that Arabs or Muslims are somehow incapable of building democratic institutions and living in a democratic society. Rather, democracy from the outset has been more of a self-serving rationalization for American strategic and economic interests in the region than a genuine concern for the right of the Iraq people to democratic self-governance.
Many Iraqis might have dreamed about democracy. What they got instead was occupation.
The U.S. government, despite much rhetoric about democracy, imposed its own political structures on Iraq, agreed to more representative procedures and institutions only when pushed to do so by the Iraqi people, presided over the breakdown of civil order, and violated the human rights of tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens. In short, Washington acted as an occupation force. By associating its actions with democracy promotion, it ended up giving democracy a bad name.
Never About Democracy
Once the arguments about "weapons of mass destruction" and links to al-Qaida were exposed as fictions, bringing democracy to Iraq became a major rationale for the U.S. invasion. Yet the Bush administration, during most of the first year of the U.S. occupation, strongly opposed holding direct elections. Soon after occupying the country, the United States appointed an "Iraqi Governing Council" (IGC) as a consultative body. Initially, Washington supported the installation of Ahmed Chalabi or some other compliant pro-American exile as leader of Iraq. When that plan proved unacceptable, U.S. officials tried to keep their viceroy Paul Bremer in power indefinitely. When it became clear that Iraqis and the international community would not tolerate that option either, the Bush administration pushed for a caucus system in which American appointees would choose the new government and write the constitution. Only in January 2004, when that plan prompted hundreds of thousands of Iraqis to take to the streets to protest the proposed caucus system and demand a popular vote, did President Bush give in and reluctantly agree to allow direct elections to move forward.
Instead of going ahead with the poll in May as called for by Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani and other Iraqi leaders, however, U.S. officials postponed the elections until January 2005. They argued that there was inadequate time to register voters and that the ration lists developed during the UN-supervised Oil for Food program were inadequate (though the voter rolls for the election were based in large part on the ration lists anyway.) In the meantime, however, the dramatic growth of the insurgency during the eight-month delay resulted in a serious deterioration of the security situation. By the time the elections finally took place, the large and important Sunni Arab minority was largely unable or unwilling to participate. In most Sunni-dominated parts of Arab-populated Iraq, threats by insurgents made it physically unsafe to go to the polls. In addition, the major Sunni parties—angered by U.S. counter-insurgency operations that killed enormous numbers of civilians during the months leading up to the election—had called for a boycott.
In the meantime, the U.S. occupation authorities announced they would formally transfer power to Iraqis at the end of June 2004. Originally, this transfer was planned as a grand public event, with parades and speeches. The highlight was supposed to be President Bush—already in neighboring Turkey at the conclusion of the NATO summit—coming down to join the festivities to formally hand over power.
To deny terrorists an opportunity for a dramatic strike, however, the authorities conducted the formal transfer two days early. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice informed Bush of the handover in a hand-written note, to which the president scribbled his now famous response, "Let freedom reign!" This oxymoron in many ways represents the contradictions inherent in any effort to forcefully impose a liberal democratic system through conquest and subjugation. Indeed, the small, short, hurried, and unannounced handover ceremony was hardly an auspicious beginning for Iraqi self-rule.
Democratic Transition
Washington chose Ayad Allawi as the leader of the U.S.-appointed interim government, despite polls of Iraqis showing that Allawi's popularity ranked quite low. His earlier career as a Baathist, which included active support for political repression, combined with his later years in exile and his ties to the CIA and anti-government terrorist groups, raised concerns regarding his commitment to democracy and human rights. Not surprisingly, he proved to be an unpopular leader. His autocratic governing style and his support for offensive military actions by U.S. and Iraqi government forces, which resulted in large-scale civilian casualties, undercut any claims to democratic rule.
To Read the Rest of the Article
by Stephen Zunes
Foreign Policy In Focus
The failures of Iraqi democratization as advocated by the Bush administration should not be blamed primarily on the Iraqis. Nor should they be used to reinforce racist notions that Arabs or Muslims are somehow incapable of building democratic institutions and living in a democratic society. Rather, democracy from the outset has been more of a self-serving rationalization for American strategic and economic interests in the region than a genuine concern for the right of the Iraq people to democratic self-governance.
Many Iraqis might have dreamed about democracy. What they got instead was occupation.
The U.S. government, despite much rhetoric about democracy, imposed its own political structures on Iraq, agreed to more representative procedures and institutions only when pushed to do so by the Iraqi people, presided over the breakdown of civil order, and violated the human rights of tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens. In short, Washington acted as an occupation force. By associating its actions with democracy promotion, it ended up giving democracy a bad name.
Never About Democracy
Once the arguments about "weapons of mass destruction" and links to al-Qaida were exposed as fictions, bringing democracy to Iraq became a major rationale for the U.S. invasion. Yet the Bush administration, during most of the first year of the U.S. occupation, strongly opposed holding direct elections. Soon after occupying the country, the United States appointed an "Iraqi Governing Council" (IGC) as a consultative body. Initially, Washington supported the installation of Ahmed Chalabi or some other compliant pro-American exile as leader of Iraq. When that plan proved unacceptable, U.S. officials tried to keep their viceroy Paul Bremer in power indefinitely. When it became clear that Iraqis and the international community would not tolerate that option either, the Bush administration pushed for a caucus system in which American appointees would choose the new government and write the constitution. Only in January 2004, when that plan prompted hundreds of thousands of Iraqis to take to the streets to protest the proposed caucus system and demand a popular vote, did President Bush give in and reluctantly agree to allow direct elections to move forward.
Instead of going ahead with the poll in May as called for by Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani and other Iraqi leaders, however, U.S. officials postponed the elections until January 2005. They argued that there was inadequate time to register voters and that the ration lists developed during the UN-supervised Oil for Food program were inadequate (though the voter rolls for the election were based in large part on the ration lists anyway.) In the meantime, however, the dramatic growth of the insurgency during the eight-month delay resulted in a serious deterioration of the security situation. By the time the elections finally took place, the large and important Sunni Arab minority was largely unable or unwilling to participate. In most Sunni-dominated parts of Arab-populated Iraq, threats by insurgents made it physically unsafe to go to the polls. In addition, the major Sunni parties—angered by U.S. counter-insurgency operations that killed enormous numbers of civilians during the months leading up to the election—had called for a boycott.
In the meantime, the U.S. occupation authorities announced they would formally transfer power to Iraqis at the end of June 2004. Originally, this transfer was planned as a grand public event, with parades and speeches. The highlight was supposed to be President Bush—already in neighboring Turkey at the conclusion of the NATO summit—coming down to join the festivities to formally hand over power.
To deny terrorists an opportunity for a dramatic strike, however, the authorities conducted the formal transfer two days early. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice informed Bush of the handover in a hand-written note, to which the president scribbled his now famous response, "Let freedom reign!" This oxymoron in many ways represents the contradictions inherent in any effort to forcefully impose a liberal democratic system through conquest and subjugation. Indeed, the small, short, hurried, and unannounced handover ceremony was hardly an auspicious beginning for Iraqi self-rule.
Democratic Transition
Washington chose Ayad Allawi as the leader of the U.S.-appointed interim government, despite polls of Iraqis showing that Allawi's popularity ranked quite low. His earlier career as a Baathist, which included active support for political repression, combined with his later years in exile and his ties to the CIA and anti-government terrorist groups, raised concerns regarding his commitment to democracy and human rights. Not surprisingly, he proved to be an unpopular leader. His autocratic governing style and his support for offensive military actions by U.S. and Iraqi government forces, which resulted in large-scale civilian casualties, undercut any claims to democratic rule.
To Read the Rest of the Article
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Special Showing: Michael Winterbottom's The Road to Guantanamo (March 19th)
On monday, March 19th, at 7pm in the auditorium of the Oswald Building on Cooper Campus of Bluegrass Community and Technical College we will be showing Michael Winterbottom's film The Road to Guantanamo. This showing will be a part of a series of showings across the nation sponsored by Amnesty International. This local showing is co-sponsored by the Bluegrass Film Society and the BCTC Peace and Justice Coalition.
Yahoo Trailer
IMDB Descriptions/Reviews
Yahoo Trailer
IMDB Descriptions/Reviews
FOX Attacks Black America [VIDEO]
FOX Attacks Black America [VIDEO]
Posted by Evan Derkacz
AlterNet
ColorOfChange has launched a campaign to urge the Congressional Black Caucus to reject a partnership with FOX News that would only legitimize the network which: "has a horrible record of attacking Black people, leaders, and cultural institutions." COC calls the partnership "shameful."
Watch the video for a sampling. It's absolutely repulsive.
From the campaign letter: "We've spoken several times with the Institute's executive director, and she says that she and the board welcome public comment. So we wanted to invite you to do exactly that. The Institute hasn't made a final decision, but they'll make an announcement in the next few days."
Watch the Video Collection of Clips from FOX Network
Posted by Evan Derkacz
AlterNet
ColorOfChange has launched a campaign to urge the Congressional Black Caucus to reject a partnership with FOX News that would only legitimize the network which: "has a horrible record of attacking Black people, leaders, and cultural institutions." COC calls the partnership "shameful."
Watch the video for a sampling. It's absolutely repulsive.
From the campaign letter: "We've spoken several times with the Institute's executive director, and she says that she and the board welcome public comment. So we wanted to invite you to do exactly that. The Institute hasn't made a final decision, but they'll make an announcement in the next few days."
Watch the Video Collection of Clips from FOX Network
Monday, March 12, 2007
Payola Settlement From Music Industry Giants
As the RIAA continues to pretend that young college students downloading online is the cause of their woes, we all know that it is the mindless/artless/affectless dreck that they continue to unleash on the public and which they promote on a pay for play basis...
Payola Still a Radio Reality
Radio Giants Agree to Settlement
Rumored Payola Agreement Angers Critics
Payola Still a Radio Reality
Radio Giants Agree to Settlement
Rumored Payola Agreement Angers Critics
A Quick Game of Blog Tag
Way, way back on 12/19/06 Inspector Lohmann tagged me and I failed to catch it until now... the rules state that I have to state five things most people don't know about me:
1) I saw my first dead body when I was 8 years old. The man had been shot in the head on a street I was riding my bicycle down. He had been shot because he had walked into a liqour store with a pair of scissors and stolen a bottle of alcohol. He was running down the street when the store owner shot what he stated was a warning shot... it hit the man directly in the back of the head. I remember being most disturbed by the act of people scooping up his brains and washing the blood away. It was a first moment of doubt in my otherwise secure, childish worldview--are we just effluvium, destined to be washed down the gutter, and scooped up into the trashbag.
2) I used to talk to angels when I was a kid (or perhaps they were demons?). The fact that no one else I knew had similar experiences was a bit disturbing to me (was it me that was messed up or those that couldn't see these things?) Now I'm not really sure if they were angels because I was cloaked in religious dogma... could have been fairies for all I know--I mean they both have wings ;) This led to me being a very shy, quiet kid. I mean other kids can be cruel (and I wasn't a big kid), so you don't exactly tell them about stuff like this unless you want to become a target for every pint-sized sadist in the neighborhood. This is why I became a writer at an early age, it was a way to talk about it.
3) When I was a kid (5 - 12) I was a seriously devout Christian who believed it was his mission to save others and to better understand my mission I decided to read the bible, word-for-word, front-to-back; I did this seven times (complete with notes, question, arguments and annotations in different colored pencils, and referencing of concordances and encyclopedias). Eventually, I lost my faith because I would attempt to ask questions of adults in church about the inconsistencies I would sense in my readings--they would avoid/ignore/chastise me--made me very angry and hurt. The vaccum of that faith-based certainty opened up a vast (w)hole inside me in which I can hear storms howling until this day. So, because I sensed lies in my former faith, I set about studying as many other beliefs as I could so that I could learn their truth(s) and their lies. I never truly believed in one thing like I did when I was kid--while I don't regret losing that innocence, I do have to admit, there is a lot of security in blind belief. A toast to chaos, confusion and creativity! Having lost my faith I also went from being a very painfully shy kid to this wild, crazy, confrontational teen/adult. I didn't give a damn what anyone thought anymore, my nihilism made me fearless in fighting for what I believed was right. I lost this recently because of some traumatic events in my life... became that painfully shy kid again for awhile (he never really left)... searching for my passion for life...
4) I compulsively make lists of things when I am stressed/anxious (blogging anyone?). This became a big problem when I wrote my MA thesis and was working on my PhD thesis. When I was a kid I was obssessed with music and would stay up late into the night making lists of everything I could find out about the artists I liked. I was a walking encyclopedia of musical knowledge. So from religious scholar to music scholar... then when I lived on the streets as a teen I would study books on personality/psychology/philosophy so that I could learn to operate in different environments of people. I would make charts of my underground tribe/organization and map out the personalities of the people we engaged in our daily business activities--their weaknesses and strengths.
5) I had 14 volumes of diaries, mostly written in code that I developed myself, that were lost when I was living on the streets when I was in my early twenties. It was supposed to be the basis for my first novel (or series of novels).
OK, who should I tag?
Camels Back and Forth
Coffee House Studio (Rainbow Demon's post pushed me to expand my original post)
Dr Menlo
El Oso, El Moreno, El Abogado (any, or all three)
Hotel Room Nudes (Good to see someone else is getting their mind seriously messed up by Hal Duncan's novel "Vellum: Book of All Hours"... actually I'm a third into the newest one "Ink")
1) I saw my first dead body when I was 8 years old. The man had been shot in the head on a street I was riding my bicycle down. He had been shot because he had walked into a liqour store with a pair of scissors and stolen a bottle of alcohol. He was running down the street when the store owner shot what he stated was a warning shot... it hit the man directly in the back of the head. I remember being most disturbed by the act of people scooping up his brains and washing the blood away. It was a first moment of doubt in my otherwise secure, childish worldview--are we just effluvium, destined to be washed down the gutter, and scooped up into the trashbag.
2) I used to talk to angels when I was a kid (or perhaps they were demons?). The fact that no one else I knew had similar experiences was a bit disturbing to me (was it me that was messed up or those that couldn't see these things?) Now I'm not really sure if they were angels because I was cloaked in religious dogma... could have been fairies for all I know--I mean they both have wings ;) This led to me being a very shy, quiet kid. I mean other kids can be cruel (and I wasn't a big kid), so you don't exactly tell them about stuff like this unless you want to become a target for every pint-sized sadist in the neighborhood. This is why I became a writer at an early age, it was a way to talk about it.
3) When I was a kid (5 - 12) I was a seriously devout Christian who believed it was his mission to save others and to better understand my mission I decided to read the bible, word-for-word, front-to-back; I did this seven times (complete with notes, question, arguments and annotations in different colored pencils, and referencing of concordances and encyclopedias). Eventually, I lost my faith because I would attempt to ask questions of adults in church about the inconsistencies I would sense in my readings--they would avoid/ignore/chastise me--made me very angry and hurt. The vaccum of that faith-based certainty opened up a vast (w)hole inside me in which I can hear storms howling until this day. So, because I sensed lies in my former faith, I set about studying as many other beliefs as I could so that I could learn their truth(s) and their lies. I never truly believed in one thing like I did when I was kid--while I don't regret losing that innocence, I do have to admit, there is a lot of security in blind belief. A toast to chaos, confusion and creativity! Having lost my faith I also went from being a very painfully shy kid to this wild, crazy, confrontational teen/adult. I didn't give a damn what anyone thought anymore, my nihilism made me fearless in fighting for what I believed was right. I lost this recently because of some traumatic events in my life... became that painfully shy kid again for awhile (he never really left)... searching for my passion for life...
4) I compulsively make lists of things when I am stressed/anxious (blogging anyone?). This became a big problem when I wrote my MA thesis and was working on my PhD thesis. When I was a kid I was obssessed with music and would stay up late into the night making lists of everything I could find out about the artists I liked. I was a walking encyclopedia of musical knowledge. So from religious scholar to music scholar... then when I lived on the streets as a teen I would study books on personality/psychology/philosophy so that I could learn to operate in different environments of people. I would make charts of my underground tribe/organization and map out the personalities of the people we engaged in our daily business activities--their weaknesses and strengths.
5) I had 14 volumes of diaries, mostly written in code that I developed myself, that were lost when I was living on the streets when I was in my early twenties. It was supposed to be the basis for my first novel (or series of novels).
OK, who should I tag?
Camels Back and Forth
Coffee House Studio (Rainbow Demon's post pushed me to expand my original post)
Dr Menlo
El Oso, El Moreno, El Abogado (any, or all three)
Hotel Room Nudes (Good to see someone else is getting their mind seriously messed up by Hal Duncan's novel "Vellum: Book of All Hours"... actually I'm a third into the newest one "Ink")
Sunday, March 11, 2007
Iraq: The Hidden Story
(Courtesy of Deep Focus)
Channel 4 documentary (British) available online on Google video: "The story of what does not get reported in Iraq by the mainstream media."
Watch Iraq: The Hidden Story
Channel 4 documentary (British) available online on Google video: "The story of what does not get reported in Iraq by the mainstream media."
Watch Iraq: The Hidden Story
Saturday, March 10, 2007
William Vollman and Other Literary Stuff
I like books (slightly more than I like films--I teach both) and I have a difficult time finding other people who like them as much as I do--at least in the way of discussing them in detail and hashing out their meaning/s... so I was delighted to come across this blog on William Vollman and being directed to a group of literary blogs seeking to come to grasp with his prolific writing. Some of the participants:
Conversational Reading
Return of the Reluctant
Rake's Progress
Black Market Kidneys
The Happy Booker
Conversational Reading
Return of the Reluctant
Rake's Progress
Black Market Kidneys
The Happy Booker
Friday, March 09, 2007
Dave Johnson: Who's Behind the Attack on Liberal Professors?
(Courtesy of Nick)
Who's Behind the Attack on Liberal Professors?
By Dave Johnson, a fellow at the Commonweal Institute.
History News Network
...
Creating "Conventional Wisdom"
Now, after 30 years of effort, this core FSFG has built a comprehensive ideological infrastructure. There are now over 500 organizations, with the Heritage Foundation at the hub, all funded by this core group. David Callahan's 1999 study, $1 Billion for Ideas: Conservative Think Tanks in the 1990s, found that just the top 20 of the organizations spent over $1 billion on this ideological effort in the 1990s.
The right-wing movement's messages are orchestrated and amplified to sound like a mass "movement" consisting of many "voices." Using "messaging"--communication techniques from the fields of marketing, public relations, and corporate image-management--the movement appeals to people's deeper feelings and values. Messages are repeated until they become "conventional wisdom." Examples include lines like "Social Security is going broke" and "public schools are failing." Both statements are questionable, yet both have been firmly embedded in the "public mind" by purposeful repetition through multiple channels. This orchestration has been referred to as a "Mighty Wurlitzer, " a CIA term that refers to propaganda that is repeated over and over again in numerous places until the public believes what it's hearing must be true.
As a study by the People for the American Way, has put it: "The result of this comprehensive and yet largely invisible funding strategy is an extraordinary amplification of the far right's views on a range of issues. The various funding recipients do not march in ideological lock-step, but they do promote many of the same issues to their respective audiences. They have thus been able to keep alive in the public debate a variety of policy ideas long ago discredited or discarded by the mainstream. That, in turn, has been of enormous value in the right's ongoing effort to reshape American society. The success of the right-wing efforts are seen at every level of government, as a vast armada of foundation-funded right-wing organizations has both fed and capitalized on the current swing to the right in Congress and in the state legislatures."
The Money Comes With Strings
The FSFG money comes with ideological strings attached. Their think tanks are not independent; their organizations must espouse their ideology. "Cato, for example," as Gregg Easterbrook pointed out in an article in the Atlantic in 1986, "flatly states that it will not release any study that calls for a government program. The institute's president, Edward Crane, says that he receives one or two commissioned reports each year that are 'inconsistent,' and he does not publish them. The analyst Jonathan Stein lost his job at [the Center For Strategic & International Studies] CSIS several months after he published a book highly critical of Star Wars, the study of which is worth millions to think tanks that toe the line. (CSIS denies there was any connection.) "
The core group that controls this movement is now attacking even Republicans who would previously have been considered "conservatives" for inadequate ideological purity. Members of the moderate wing of the Republican Party are derided by the radical right as nothing more than RINO's -- Republicans In Name Only. The FSFG is funding efforts to drive these moderates out of office and out of the party.(2)
The Movement is Coordinated
Currently the core of the "conservative movement" meets weekly with representatives of the FSFG. As Eric Alterman has revealed:
Their weekly agenda was hammered out every Wednesday at a meeting chaired by Grover Norquist, a rightwing Leninist who believes in an ever-shifting tactical alliance.… Among those who attend the invitation-only meetings are spokespeople and representatives of NRA, the Christian Coalition, the Heritage Foundation; corporate lobbyists, the top people from the Republican party and the Congressional Republican leadership, and chief White House aides. Trusted rightwing journalists and editors also attend, though the meetings are off the record.
While the ostensible purpose of the meeting is to share information and coordinate strategy, they also give Norquist the opportunity to act as an ideological enforcer. When one member of the Bush administration worried to a New York Times reporter that the administration's plan to repeal the estate tax would cripple charitable giving, he was publicly warned by Norquist that this was "the first betrayal of Bush", and was gone not long afterward. When a conservative pundit named Laura Ingraham criticised a fellow conservative in the House of Representatives for overzealousness, she was immediately informed by Norquist to decide "whether to be with us or against us". She was no longer welcome at the meetings.
David Brock, in his book Blinded By the Right, described from inside this "movement" how different parts of the right-wing web and their funders interacted during the attempt to remove President Clinton from office. Brock writes that funding was supplied by Richard Mellon Scaife, Federalist Society (funded by Scaife) lawyers and judges working behind the scenes assisting Special Prosecutor Ken Starr and supplying information to (Scaife-funded) American Spectator magazine.
A Case Study
Often it is possible to discern how the timing of a "Mighty Wurlitzer" chorus relates to a planned conservative policy initiative. A recent example is the flurry of articles that hit the press starting in late November, originating from the Heritage Foundation, Americans for Tax Reform and the Tax Foundation, which claimed that the poor do not pay enough income taxes. The Wall Street Journal even referred to the poor as "lucky duckies." The paper did not mention that poor people do pay Social Security taxes. The publicity appears to have been timed to the release of the president's latest tax-cutting program.(3)
The Effect on Society
The core right-wing web of organizations funded by the FSFG has increasingly been able to set the public agenda, shifting national and local politics consistently to the right and away from the mainstream public interest. As a result, right-wing ideological premises and arguments dominate public-issue debate, with big money using this communications infrastructure to drown out other voices, virtually creating a one-dollar-one-vote society. "As one investigative journalist stated years ago in a pioneering investigation of the conservative philanthropy of Richard Scaife," wrote Sally Covington in a 1997 study, "layer upon layer of seminars, studies, conferences, and interviews [can] do much to push along if not create, the issues, which then become the national agenda of debate.... By multiplying the authorities to whom the media are prepared to give a friendly hearing, [conservative donations] have helped to create an illusion of diversity where none exists. The result could be an increasing number of one-sided debates in which the challengers are far outnumbered, if indeed they are heard from at all."
To Read the Entire Hyperlinked Essay
Who's Behind the Attack on Liberal Professors?
By Dave Johnson, a fellow at the Commonweal Institute.
History News Network
...
Creating "Conventional Wisdom"
Now, after 30 years of effort, this core FSFG has built a comprehensive ideological infrastructure. There are now over 500 organizations, with the Heritage Foundation at the hub, all funded by this core group. David Callahan's 1999 study, $1 Billion for Ideas: Conservative Think Tanks in the 1990s, found that just the top 20 of the organizations spent over $1 billion on this ideological effort in the 1990s.
The right-wing movement's messages are orchestrated and amplified to sound like a mass "movement" consisting of many "voices." Using "messaging"--communication techniques from the fields of marketing, public relations, and corporate image-management--the movement appeals to people's deeper feelings and values. Messages are repeated until they become "conventional wisdom." Examples include lines like "Social Security is going broke" and "public schools are failing." Both statements are questionable, yet both have been firmly embedded in the "public mind" by purposeful repetition through multiple channels. This orchestration has been referred to as a "Mighty Wurlitzer, " a CIA term that refers to propaganda that is repeated over and over again in numerous places until the public believes what it's hearing must be true.
As a study by the People for the American Way, has put it: "The result of this comprehensive and yet largely invisible funding strategy is an extraordinary amplification of the far right's views on a range of issues. The various funding recipients do not march in ideological lock-step, but they do promote many of the same issues to their respective audiences. They have thus been able to keep alive in the public debate a variety of policy ideas long ago discredited or discarded by the mainstream. That, in turn, has been of enormous value in the right's ongoing effort to reshape American society. The success of the right-wing efforts are seen at every level of government, as a vast armada of foundation-funded right-wing organizations has both fed and capitalized on the current swing to the right in Congress and in the state legislatures."
The Money Comes With Strings
The FSFG money comes with ideological strings attached. Their think tanks are not independent; their organizations must espouse their ideology. "Cato, for example," as Gregg Easterbrook pointed out in an article in the Atlantic in 1986, "flatly states that it will not release any study that calls for a government program. The institute's president, Edward Crane, says that he receives one or two commissioned reports each year that are 'inconsistent,' and he does not publish them. The analyst Jonathan Stein lost his job at [the Center For Strategic & International Studies] CSIS several months after he published a book highly critical of Star Wars, the study of which is worth millions to think tanks that toe the line. (CSIS denies there was any connection.) "
The core group that controls this movement is now attacking even Republicans who would previously have been considered "conservatives" for inadequate ideological purity. Members of the moderate wing of the Republican Party are derided by the radical right as nothing more than RINO's -- Republicans In Name Only. The FSFG is funding efforts to drive these moderates out of office and out of the party.(2)
The Movement is Coordinated
Currently the core of the "conservative movement" meets weekly with representatives of the FSFG. As Eric Alterman has revealed:
Their weekly agenda was hammered out every Wednesday at a meeting chaired by Grover Norquist, a rightwing Leninist who believes in an ever-shifting tactical alliance.… Among those who attend the invitation-only meetings are spokespeople and representatives of NRA, the Christian Coalition, the Heritage Foundation; corporate lobbyists, the top people from the Republican party and the Congressional Republican leadership, and chief White House aides. Trusted rightwing journalists and editors also attend, though the meetings are off the record.
While the ostensible purpose of the meeting is to share information and coordinate strategy, they also give Norquist the opportunity to act as an ideological enforcer. When one member of the Bush administration worried to a New York Times reporter that the administration's plan to repeal the estate tax would cripple charitable giving, he was publicly warned by Norquist that this was "the first betrayal of Bush", and was gone not long afterward. When a conservative pundit named Laura Ingraham criticised a fellow conservative in the House of Representatives for overzealousness, she was immediately informed by Norquist to decide "whether to be with us or against us". She was no longer welcome at the meetings.
David Brock, in his book Blinded By the Right, described from inside this "movement" how different parts of the right-wing web and their funders interacted during the attempt to remove President Clinton from office. Brock writes that funding was supplied by Richard Mellon Scaife, Federalist Society (funded by Scaife) lawyers and judges working behind the scenes assisting Special Prosecutor Ken Starr and supplying information to (Scaife-funded) American Spectator magazine.
A Case Study
Often it is possible to discern how the timing of a "Mighty Wurlitzer" chorus relates to a planned conservative policy initiative. A recent example is the flurry of articles that hit the press starting in late November, originating from the Heritage Foundation, Americans for Tax Reform and the Tax Foundation, which claimed that the poor do not pay enough income taxes. The Wall Street Journal even referred to the poor as "lucky duckies." The paper did not mention that poor people do pay Social Security taxes. The publicity appears to have been timed to the release of the president's latest tax-cutting program.(3)
The Effect on Society
The core right-wing web of organizations funded by the FSFG has increasingly been able to set the public agenda, shifting national and local politics consistently to the right and away from the mainstream public interest. As a result, right-wing ideological premises and arguments dominate public-issue debate, with big money using this communications infrastructure to drown out other voices, virtually creating a one-dollar-one-vote society. "As one investigative journalist stated years ago in a pioneering investigation of the conservative philanthropy of Richard Scaife," wrote Sally Covington in a 1997 study, "layer upon layer of seminars, studies, conferences, and interviews [can] do much to push along if not create, the issues, which then become the national agenda of debate.... By multiplying the authorities to whom the media are prepared to give a friendly hearing, [conservative donations] have helped to create an illusion of diversity where none exists. The result could be an increasing number of one-sided debates in which the challengers are far outnumbered, if indeed they are heard from at all."
To Read the Entire Hyperlinked Essay
Benjamin Franklin: The Definition of Insanity...
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
Benjamin Franklin
Benjamin Franklin
Thursday, March 08, 2007
Song of the Day: Suicidal Tendencies's "I Wasn't Meant To Feel This / Asleep At The Wheel"
I Wasn't Meant To Feel This / Asleep At The Wheel
[Mike Muir] Performed by Suicidal Tendencies
What's he saying?
Yeah...just...a little...closer...
What's he doing?
It was, I know, by the corner...yeah
Sitting in the darkness...yeah
I didn't see it, but I know
It tries to hide sometimes, he he he
But it can't fool me...no
Because I had this thing, it's the way I see
The way I see when my eyes are closed
A conception of misconception
It's really quite, shall we say...
The really beautiful thing!
This is certain things that I've come to find
In my communications that never existed
Certain understandings that I've come to realize...yeah
But I don't believe it...no
Not for second!
It wasn't really truthful in the ways that I, that I, that I, that...
They're here right now...yeah
I wasn't meant to feel this...
I wasn't meant to feel this...
I wasn't meant to feel this way
I wasn't meant to feel this...
...
Counting on nothing............Uuuuuuuh...
The numbers get higher.........Ai ai ai ai ai...
Blinded by reason..............Uuuh ah uuuh ah...
You're asleep at the wheel.....Yeeeeeea...
Ai ai ai ai ai ai ai...
Ai ai ai ai ai ai ai...
Confused understanding.........
With a slip...for the hold.....Ai ai ai ai ai...
Squeeze past the pressure......
You're asleep at the wheel.....
A magical moment
Is it...too much of a good thing
Recycled in memory
Was it...too much of a good thing
Why can't you remember
Is it...too much of a good thing
Preserved in its danger
You're all asleep at the wheel...
Blank stare and a whisper, blank stare and a whisper
But who are the judges, who are you judging?
I thought you'd be different, I thought you'd be different
You're all asleep at the wheel, you're asleep at the wheel
A special assignment
Is it...too much of a good thing
Unlocked under pressure
Was it...too much of a good thing
Confined unforgivingness
Is it...too much of a good thing
A new kind of danger
You're all asleep at the wheel...
Ai ai ai ai ai ai ai...
Ai ai ai ai ai ai ai...
Hope in revision...............Uuuuuuuh...
Slight miscalculation..........Ai ai ai ai ai...
It all goes in stages..........Uuuh ah uuuh ah...
You're asleep at the wheel.....Yeeeeeea...
Ai ai ai ai ai ai ai...
Ai ai ai ai ai ai ai...
Ai ai ai ai ai ai ai...
Ai ai ai ai ai ai ai...
A blank stare and a whisper....
I thought you were different...
But who are you judging........
I thought you were different...
You're asleep at the wheel...
Rob Weir: Teaching Without Textbooks
Teaching Without Textbooks
By Rob Weir
Inside Higher Ed
Here’s a statement with which everyone can agree: College instructors cannot assume that students come to their classes in possession of basic knowledge. Now here’s one sure to generate some controversy: In many cases textbooks deter the pursuit of knowledge more than they help it. The sciences may be different, but at least in the case of the humanities, most of us would be better off not assigning a textbook.
Alas, there are still some dinosaurs lumbering about who only assign a text and subject their students to drill-and-kill (the spirit) exercises straight out the McGuffey’s Reader era. There’s really not much to say about such instructors except to wish them a speedy retirement. If one assumes the ability to read as the rock-bottom criterion for college entry, there’s really no point to rehashing text material with students other than to clarify what confuses them, a matter that should be approached on a case-by-case basis. Any institution still devoted to text-and-test could usefully place said courses online.
Most of us assign textbooks for what we always assumed were good pedagogical reasons: We wanted students to be able to fill in gaps we don’t get to, engage in fact-checking, hear other perspectives, have easy access to data, find a framework for some of our more esoteric departures, and provide students with a specialized reference guide rather than having them reach for a general topics encyclopedia. Great ideas — except that it doesn’t work that way anymore!
Today’s texts are too expensive, too long, and too dense to be of practical use. I freely admit that it was the first of these sins that first led me to eschew a text in my introductory U.S. history classes. Houghton Mifflin’s People and a Nation retails for $97; Longman’s America, Past and Present goes for $95.20 and The Pursuit of Liberty for $99; McGraw Hill’s American History checks out at a whopping $125.75; with Norton’s Give Me Liberty! and Wadworth’s American Past relative bargains at $77.75 and $79.95 respectively. All of the aforementioned prices are Barnes and Noble online quotes; chances are good that a college bookstore near you will inflate each of these. There are only a handful of U.S. texts under $40 and only one, Howard Zinn’s ideologically loaded A People’s History of the United States that’s less than $20.
I decided to stop using a text when the $35 paperback I was using shot up to $75 and I simply couldn’t justify the price, given how little I teach from a text. (Very little generates more student complaints than a professor assigning a book that’s not used.)
Now comes the weird part — if anything, student achievement was better after I stopped assigning a text. Part of the reason for this is that textbooks are too long. Many colleges have a proverbial “‘gentlemen’s agreement”’ that more than 100 pages per week of reading per course is excessive. Even those of us who teach in highly competitive institutions know that there’s an upper limit. Even if you can get away with 200 per week, in an average semester your students will read about 2,500 pages. Do you really want one-third or more of that devoted to a textbook? My initial trade was easy; dumping the text meant I could assign an extra three monographs and probe topics in depth that would otherwise have been glossed. Students consistently tell me they were happy to have read a biography on Betty Friedan or a study of the civil rights movement rather than a textbook. I’m sure that they’ll retain much more from such studies.
Here’s the dirty secret that you’ll never see printed in a publisher’s glossy promo material: Every textbook on the market is a crashing bore to read. All the publishers will assure you that they’ve added special features designed to attract today’s young people and that the prose is lively and engaging. Yeah, right. The colorful maps, pop-out documents, intra-textual questions to contemplate, vibrant graphics, etc. serve only to drive up production costs and students won’t use them. Note to profs: Got an image or a chart you really want students to use? Put it on a PowerPoint and project it in class.
Texts are not boring because of the people who write them. I know many of the folks whose names are on texts and know that they’re dynamic teachers and writers. The problem is density. Put simply, most texts try to do way too much. I’m a proponent of multiculturalism and the last thing in the world we need is a return to “dead white men” history, but the more any text tries to do, the less coherent it will be. What would make more sense is for publishers to knock out some specialized texts. I’m a social and cultural historian and there’s little that I teach doesn’t reference race, class, and gender; hence, I don’t need a text that parrots me in print. What I could use is a really short political/economic history; just as those whose specialty is political history would probably appreciate a nice cultural survey, or perhaps one that discusses multiculturalism.
To Read the Rest of this Opinion Piece
By Rob Weir
Inside Higher Ed
Here’s a statement with which everyone can agree: College instructors cannot assume that students come to their classes in possession of basic knowledge. Now here’s one sure to generate some controversy: In many cases textbooks deter the pursuit of knowledge more than they help it. The sciences may be different, but at least in the case of the humanities, most of us would be better off not assigning a textbook.
Alas, there are still some dinosaurs lumbering about who only assign a text and subject their students to drill-and-kill (the spirit) exercises straight out the McGuffey’s Reader era. There’s really not much to say about such instructors except to wish them a speedy retirement. If one assumes the ability to read as the rock-bottom criterion for college entry, there’s really no point to rehashing text material with students other than to clarify what confuses them, a matter that should be approached on a case-by-case basis. Any institution still devoted to text-and-test could usefully place said courses online.
Most of us assign textbooks for what we always assumed were good pedagogical reasons: We wanted students to be able to fill in gaps we don’t get to, engage in fact-checking, hear other perspectives, have easy access to data, find a framework for some of our more esoteric departures, and provide students with a specialized reference guide rather than having them reach for a general topics encyclopedia. Great ideas — except that it doesn’t work that way anymore!
Today’s texts are too expensive, too long, and too dense to be of practical use. I freely admit that it was the first of these sins that first led me to eschew a text in my introductory U.S. history classes. Houghton Mifflin’s People and a Nation retails for $97; Longman’s America, Past and Present goes for $95.20 and The Pursuit of Liberty for $99; McGraw Hill’s American History checks out at a whopping $125.75; with Norton’s Give Me Liberty! and Wadworth’s American Past relative bargains at $77.75 and $79.95 respectively. All of the aforementioned prices are Barnes and Noble online quotes; chances are good that a college bookstore near you will inflate each of these. There are only a handful of U.S. texts under $40 and only one, Howard Zinn’s ideologically loaded A People’s History of the United States that’s less than $20.
I decided to stop using a text when the $35 paperback I was using shot up to $75 and I simply couldn’t justify the price, given how little I teach from a text. (Very little generates more student complaints than a professor assigning a book that’s not used.)
Now comes the weird part — if anything, student achievement was better after I stopped assigning a text. Part of the reason for this is that textbooks are too long. Many colleges have a proverbial “‘gentlemen’s agreement”’ that more than 100 pages per week of reading per course is excessive. Even those of us who teach in highly competitive institutions know that there’s an upper limit. Even if you can get away with 200 per week, in an average semester your students will read about 2,500 pages. Do you really want one-third or more of that devoted to a textbook? My initial trade was easy; dumping the text meant I could assign an extra three monographs and probe topics in depth that would otherwise have been glossed. Students consistently tell me they were happy to have read a biography on Betty Friedan or a study of the civil rights movement rather than a textbook. I’m sure that they’ll retain much more from such studies.
Here’s the dirty secret that you’ll never see printed in a publisher’s glossy promo material: Every textbook on the market is a crashing bore to read. All the publishers will assure you that they’ve added special features designed to attract today’s young people and that the prose is lively and engaging. Yeah, right. The colorful maps, pop-out documents, intra-textual questions to contemplate, vibrant graphics, etc. serve only to drive up production costs and students won’t use them. Note to profs: Got an image or a chart you really want students to use? Put it on a PowerPoint and project it in class.
Texts are not boring because of the people who write them. I know many of the folks whose names are on texts and know that they’re dynamic teachers and writers. The problem is density. Put simply, most texts try to do way too much. I’m a proponent of multiculturalism and the last thing in the world we need is a return to “dead white men” history, but the more any text tries to do, the less coherent it will be. What would make more sense is for publishers to knock out some specialized texts. I’m a social and cultural historian and there’s little that I teach doesn’t reference race, class, and gender; hence, I don’t need a text that parrots me in print. What I could use is a really short political/economic history; just as those whose specialty is political history would probably appreciate a nice cultural survey, or perhaps one that discusses multiculturalism.
To Read the Rest of this Opinion Piece
Bill Van Auken: Highway massacre sparks anti-US protests in Afghanistan
Highway massacre sparks anti-US protests in Afghanistan
By Bill Van Auken
World Socialist Web Site
The slaughter of some 16 civilians and the wounding of at least two dozen more by US troops in Afghanistan Sunday sparked angry protests demanding a withdrawal of the occupation forces and the ouster of Washington’s puppet, President Hamid Karzai.
The killings took place on a main highway between the Afghan town of Jalalabad and the Pakistani border after a suicide bomber detonated a car loaded with explosives near a convoy of US Marines.
Both eyewitnesses to the incident and some Afghan officials described the US troops firing indiscriminately at civilians in their vehicles and on foot in angry retaliation for the suicide attack.
A military spokesman claimed that the civilians were “caught in the crossfire,” and that the car bomb was part of a “complex ambush involving enemy small arms fire from several directions.”
Responding according to the occupation force’s standard script, the spokesman, Lt. Col. David Accetta, issued a cynical statement declaring that “the terrorists demonstrated their blatant disregard for human life by attacking coalition forces in a populated area, knowing full well that innocent Afghans would be killed and wounded.”
Witnesses, however, said that the only fire came from the American troops. Doctors who treated the wounded said that all of wounds were caused by bullets and none by shrapnel from the bomb blast.
“They were firing everywhere, and even opened fire on 14 to 15 vehicles passing on the highway,” Tur Gul, who was shot twice in the hand as he stood at a gas station near the scene of the incident, told the Associated Press. “They opened fire on everybody, the ones inside the vehicles and the ones on foot.”
Fifteen-year-old Mohammad Ishaq, who was also shot twice during the barrage, added, “When we parked our vehicle, when they passed us, they opened fire on our vehicle. It was a convoy of three American Humvees. All three Humvees were firing around.”
Ahmed Najib, 23, was wounded together with his two-year-old brother. “One American was in the first vehicle, shouting to stop on the side of the road, and we stopped,” he said. “The first vehicle did not fire on us, but the second opened fire on our car. I saw them turning and firing in this direction, then turning and firing in that direction. I even saw a farmer shot by the Americans.”
Another man told the Al Jazeera news agency that five members of his family had been killed in the shooting. “American bullets murdered my family,” he said. “It’s tyranny and injustice.”
The district chief of Shinwar, Mohammad Khan Katawazi, told the news agency that the US Marines appeared to treat everyone on the highway, including both those in cars and on foot, as insurgents.
To Read the Rest of the Report
By Bill Van Auken
World Socialist Web Site
The slaughter of some 16 civilians and the wounding of at least two dozen more by US troops in Afghanistan Sunday sparked angry protests demanding a withdrawal of the occupation forces and the ouster of Washington’s puppet, President Hamid Karzai.
The killings took place on a main highway between the Afghan town of Jalalabad and the Pakistani border after a suicide bomber detonated a car loaded with explosives near a convoy of US Marines.
Both eyewitnesses to the incident and some Afghan officials described the US troops firing indiscriminately at civilians in their vehicles and on foot in angry retaliation for the suicide attack.
A military spokesman claimed that the civilians were “caught in the crossfire,” and that the car bomb was part of a “complex ambush involving enemy small arms fire from several directions.”
Responding according to the occupation force’s standard script, the spokesman, Lt. Col. David Accetta, issued a cynical statement declaring that “the terrorists demonstrated their blatant disregard for human life by attacking coalition forces in a populated area, knowing full well that innocent Afghans would be killed and wounded.”
Witnesses, however, said that the only fire came from the American troops. Doctors who treated the wounded said that all of wounds were caused by bullets and none by shrapnel from the bomb blast.
“They were firing everywhere, and even opened fire on 14 to 15 vehicles passing on the highway,” Tur Gul, who was shot twice in the hand as he stood at a gas station near the scene of the incident, told the Associated Press. “They opened fire on everybody, the ones inside the vehicles and the ones on foot.”
Fifteen-year-old Mohammad Ishaq, who was also shot twice during the barrage, added, “When we parked our vehicle, when they passed us, they opened fire on our vehicle. It was a convoy of three American Humvees. All three Humvees were firing around.”
Ahmed Najib, 23, was wounded together with his two-year-old brother. “One American was in the first vehicle, shouting to stop on the side of the road, and we stopped,” he said. “The first vehicle did not fire on us, but the second opened fire on our car. I saw them turning and firing in this direction, then turning and firing in that direction. I even saw a farmer shot by the Americans.”
Another man told the Al Jazeera news agency that five members of his family had been killed in the shooting. “American bullets murdered my family,” he said. “It’s tyranny and injustice.”
The district chief of Shinwar, Mohammad Khan Katawazi, told the news agency that the US Marines appeared to treat everyone on the highway, including both those in cars and on foot, as insurgents.
To Read the Rest of the Report
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
Jean Baudrillard: 1929-2007
My friend JZ writes at hearing that Jean Baudrillard died:
---------------------------------------
Another friend TP adds:
-------------------------------------------
My Reply:
Following Baudrillard, I would say his death never really happened, it was all a simulation (including his life)... OK, everyone, run to your copies of Cronenberg's film Videodrome and listen to the words of Brian O'Blivion...
JZ, I have been looping and splicing my "history" in order to overlay/delay/relay (depending on the mood of the day!) any final conclusion--thus it is still a work in progress, eternal return, becoming vs. being, reconstructive-deconstructions, and all that stuff...
TP, your point cuts through the mediated haze that clouds my mind and causes me to think why we mourn those we have never met. What havoc do these mediated simulations play in the development of our unconscious inner screens-- and what power do they have in our outer projections?
Thivai
Also check out Green Cine's memorial:
Baudrillard
First Bourdieu, then Derrida, now Baudrillard...Where have all the
poststructuralists gone? And will anyone be able to take their places?
Guardian: Obituary
As Baudrillard himself wrote in "Cool Memories", he was a "pataphysician at twenty – situationist at thirty – utopian at forty – transversal at fifty – and viral and metaleptic at sixty - that's my history”.
As we pause to think about our own hyperreality, what "history" have you been constructing for yourself?
May he finally rest in peace,
JZ
---------------------------------------
Another friend TP adds:
It's interesting to think that since none of us knew him personally he was and is an abstraction to us regardless of his life/death status. Whether alive or
dead he wasn't/isn't even a simulation to us, he was an abstraction, a collection of ideas with a byline. Or was he a simulation of an abstraction? Or an abstraction of a simulation of an abstraction?
-------------------------------------------
My Reply:
Following Baudrillard, I would say his death never really happened, it was all a simulation (including his life)... OK, everyone, run to your copies of Cronenberg's film Videodrome and listen to the words of Brian O'Blivion...
JZ, I have been looping and splicing my "history" in order to overlay/delay/relay (depending on the mood of the day!) any final conclusion--thus it is still a work in progress, eternal return, becoming vs. being, reconstructive-deconstructions, and all that stuff...
TP, your point cuts through the mediated haze that clouds my mind and causes me to think why we mourn those we have never met. What havoc do these mediated simulations play in the development of our unconscious inner screens-- and what power do they have in our outer projections?
Thivai
Also check out Green Cine's memorial:
Baudrillard
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
Smoking Gun: Walter Reed scandal connected to Halliburton & FEMA?
Smoking Gun: Walter Reed scandal connected to Halliburton & FEMA?
posted by Evan Derkacz
AlterNet
Not only is the scandalous treatment of American Troops at Walter Reed military hospital connected to Halliburton and Katrina-era FEMA (see video right) but it's also, at its core, a deeply, deeply conservative scandal.
"Privatization," or the transfer of any and all services into the hands of market morality, is a fundamental part of the conservative project.
For its past performance in the public sector, see Energy Crisis, California.
This time, under some shady circumstances, a private firm IAP was given the contract to take over a number of services at Walter Reed, despite the fact that the employees' bid was lower.
Only after IAP "protested" (according to Waxman's letter to General Weightman PDF) was the employees' bid "increased" and the contract awarded to the private firm headed by ex-Halliburton official, Al Neffgen.
This privatization precipitated an 80% drop in care workers, leading to a human scandal that the market will never ever, ever be equipped to handle. It's neither the market's, nor conservatives', business. At the heart of privatization is the belief that competing desires to make a buck will "take care of everything."
Read the rest of the AlterNet report, Government studies, and watch the CNN report
Also check out:
American Legion Commander: ‘I Blame Bush And Congress’ For Veterans Cuts
Wired Magazine: Military MD Shortage at Home
Pentagon Official Said Veterans Benefits Were ‘Hurtful’ To National Security
posted by Evan Derkacz
AlterNet
Not only is the scandalous treatment of American Troops at Walter Reed military hospital connected to Halliburton and Katrina-era FEMA (see video right) but it's also, at its core, a deeply, deeply conservative scandal.
"Privatization," or the transfer of any and all services into the hands of market morality, is a fundamental part of the conservative project.
For its past performance in the public sector, see Energy Crisis, California.
This time, under some shady circumstances, a private firm IAP was given the contract to take over a number of services at Walter Reed, despite the fact that the employees' bid was lower.
Only after IAP "protested" (according to Waxman's letter to General Weightman PDF) was the employees' bid "increased" and the contract awarded to the private firm headed by ex-Halliburton official, Al Neffgen.
This privatization precipitated an 80% drop in care workers, leading to a human scandal that the market will never ever, ever be equipped to handle. It's neither the market's, nor conservatives', business. At the heart of privatization is the belief that competing desires to make a buck will "take care of everything."
Read the rest of the AlterNet report, Government studies, and watch the CNN report
Also check out:
American Legion Commander: ‘I Blame Bush And Congress’ For Veterans Cuts
Wired Magazine: Military MD Shortage at Home
Pentagon Official Said Veterans Benefits Were ‘Hurtful’ To National Security
Monday, March 05, 2007
NPR: All Songs Considered and Bob Boilen
Seven years and still going--thanks for introducing me to new musicians and reintroducing me to old favorites:
All Songs Considered
All Songs Considered
Saturday, March 03, 2007
Media and Popular Culture
This is an archive for my writing students that are researching media culture and pupular culture papers. To the students these are all resources that I have chosen to demonstrate what I think are academic sources available online--so think about why the site is chosen: verifiable source/author of the materials; able to identify the worldview/framework/discipline of the organiztion/collective/individual; quality of the materials--my and your judgment; archive of other visual sources (for instance the Gender Ads site). Remember this is just some prompts that can get you "started."
Here are some beginning sites:
What is a What is a Thesis Statement?
Washington State University: American Popular Culture
Media Literacy Clearinghouse
Critical Media Studies
How to write a film paper:
British Film Institute: Film Researching Resources These are actually teaching resources but very useful for researching papers. BFI is one of the most respected film organizations; a resource for schools/colleges in the UK; they publish many books and the excellent film magazine "Sight and Sound."
Film Analysis Resources This incredible site is hosted by Yale University Film Studies department
Viewing and Watching Film Critically I'm not sure who Tim Dirks is but the materials covered here are either straight-forward understandings of concepts, some genre analysis on other pages, and links to other sites. It helps that this site has received commendations from other trusted sources (like the film critic Roger Ebert)
More films studies resources from Yale Library
Advertising Issues:
Gender Ads Resources for Dr. Scott A. Lukas' Gender courses as well as his introductory social science courses at Lake Tahoe Community College and Valparaiso University. Extensive website, with huge archives of primary and secondary sources.
Gender, Race and Ethnicity in Media Advertising University of Iowa's Communication Studies dept. has compiled this huge archive of links.
How to Read an Ad Dr. Scott A' Lukas put this together.
Gender Advertiosements Aimed at African Americans Originally published in the journal Sex Roles: A Journal of Research (Jan, 1999)
Female Gender Images in Adolescent Magazine Advertising Originally published in Australian Marketing Journal (11.1: 2003)
About-Face: Body Activism "About-Face's mission is to equip women and girls with tools to understand and resist the harmful stereotypes of women the media disseminates. There are three components to About-Face's program, Education into Action: media-literacy workshops, action groups, and this resource-filled web site. About-Face is based in San Francisco, California. Our workshops and action groups reach throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. Our web site, of course, is available the world over." This website includes many primary (the actual ads) and secondary sources (intepretative/evaluative resources).
A Sociological Analysis of Children's Television Advertising Put together by two senior sociology majors at St. Lawrence University in NY.
Popular Culture: Advertising
From Washtington State University's American Popular Culture Archive.
The Persuaders PBS Frontline documentary hosted by media theorist Douglas Rushkoff; includes many other resources.
Merchants of Cool PBS Frontline documentary hosted by media theorist Douglas Rushkoff; includes many other resources.
Reading Advertisements Newsweek Magazine Education
The Language of Advertising Claims John Padgett's University of Mississippi guide for his ENG 102 course.
The Language of Advertising Peter Sells and Sierra Gonzale on the Stanford University Website.
Adbusters' Spoof Ads Canadian magazine that is a center of culture jamming.
Tobacco Spoof Ads
Analysis of Advertisements (Daniel Chandler's semiotic guide to understanding ads)
Beauty and Body Image in the Media (Media Awareness Network guide)
The Devil Wears Prada:
Story Analysis of the Film
Sympathy for the She Devil Salon magazine article.
Fairy Tales:
Wikipedia: Fairy Tales Wikipedia is an online collection of articles which is authored and edited by many people (and includes critiques of the pieces when someone finds the objectionable/misleading). Should be used solely as a guide to thinking about a broad subject/theme, followed by your own research.
Fair Tales, Myths and Legends Francie Quaas-Berryman's for her Cerritos College ENG 100 courses
Fairy Tales and Script Analysis Very academic analysis mapping the structure of fairy tales.
Fairy Tales A. Waller Hastings's website for his students.
Theory & Method Written by Kevin Yee and hosted by Disney. Good intro to the various theories/methods used to analyze fairy tales.
Psychoanalysis and Fairy Tales Hosted by the Romanian Association of Pyschoanalysis--intro to this theoretical perspective.
Artist: Alex Grey
The Artwork of Alex Grey His personal/professional website.
The Visionary Art of Alex Grey
Alex Grey on YouTube
Alex Grey: Art and Spirit (an interview)
Alex Grey: Art, Love, Family, and Psychedelics
Marketing of Diet Pills/Prescription Drugs
Medicating Kids PBS Frontline documentary available online and more resources.
Diet Wars Frontline documentary.
Prescription Drug Ad Marketing Media Literacy Clearinghouse
Prescription Drugs: Concerns and Controversies of Direct-to-Consumer Advertisements Article posted at the American Medical Student Association site--originally published in Cornell Political Forum (May 1998)
Pornography:
American Porn PBS Frontline documentary online and more resources.
History of Sex in Cinema
Barbie Dolls:
Barbie Liberation Culture Jammers subverting Barbie and GI Joe.
Barbie Liberation Organization
Wikipedia: Barbie
War Movies
War and Anti-War Films Film Site overview of the genres.
Wikipedia: War Films
How to Evaluate War Movies and Questions to Help You Evaluate War Films and War is Hell Pass the Popcorn Center for Media Literacy
Remind me I have essays on this subject that I hand out to my film classes.
Music Piracy/Downloading Issues:
Recording Industry Association of America statement about piracy
American Federation of Musicians statement on music piracy
MUSIC PIRACY AND THE AUDIO HOME RECORDING ACT Duke Law and Technology Review (2002)
Is Music Piracy Stealing? Applelinks
‘Golden Age of Free Music’ vs ‘Copying is Stealing’ Published at The Register (2003)
The Music Piracy Myth Tim O' Reilly is founder and CEO of O'Reilly Media a computer book publishing company.
Music Piracy Defendents Fighting Back The National Law Journal (2005)
Cultures of Music Piracy International Jouirnal of Cultural Studies (2004)
Celebrity Culture:
Wikipedia: Celebrity Culture
World History Site: Dysfunctional Celebrities
Media and Rise of Celebrity Culture Amy Henderson is a historian at the National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution. First published in OAH Magazine of History 6 (Spring 1992)
The Culture Celebrity Essay by Joseph Epstein in the Weekly Standard. Good introduction to some of the people writing and thinking about it.
Hypertrophic Celebrity MC Journal (2004)
The Culture of Celebrity: An Annotated Bibliography Compiled byy students at the College of New Jersey. Very helpful!
Alcohol Advertising:
Yahoo Collection of Alcohol Ads
Alcohol Advertising and Youth Also visit the main site of The Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth at Georgetown University
Stanford University online collection of 55 Alcohol Ads
SUNY Potsdam University: Alcohol Advertising
Analyszing Alcohol Advertisements and Marketing Frank Baker for Media Literacy Clearinghouse
Alcohol Advertising and Youth Marin Institute
Wikipedia: Alcohol Advertising
Adbusters: Spoof Ads Has a section spoofing/critiquing alcohol ads.
Online Communities:
Wikipedia: Social Network
Social Networking Blog Survey of the culture online
Howard Rheingold New Media theorist
Smart Mobs Website inspired by Rheingold's book.
Taking the "You" Out of YouTube Critique by media theorist Henry Jenkins.
Who Profits from User Created Content By Rheingold
DIY Media Weblog Hosted by the USC Annenberg Center
Wikipedia: Virtual Community
Online Community Toolkits Full Circle Associates--a consulting group.
News/Journalism Issues
Columbia Journalism Review Important magazine that covers the world of journalism
The News War PBS Frontline documentary available online and more resources.
Critical Media Studies: Journalism Resources
Project Censored An essential archival guide to the major news stories that are regularly censored or ignored by mainstream/corporate media news agencies. They do an annual collection of the year's top 25 censored news stories. Check out the 2007 edition and the archive of of past annual reports They also have a good archive of Alternative News Sources available online
Wikipedia: Topics in Journalism
Propaganda:
Propaganda Critic Very useful guide to the basic concepts from The Institute for Propaganda Analysis.
Public Relations (PR) Watch and SourceWatch and Public Relations Industry and Propaganda Techniques and Propaganda Hosted by the Center for Media and Democracy
Wikipedia: Propaganda
Nancy Snow Leading critic of the American cultural and political propaganda techniques used worldwide. Check out her Ten Things Everyone Should Know About Propaganda and Propaganda News
Propaganda, Pop Culture and Public Diplomacy
Here are some beginning sites:
What is a What is a Thesis Statement?
Washington State University: American Popular Culture
Media Literacy Clearinghouse
Critical Media Studies
How to write a film paper:
British Film Institute: Film Researching Resources These are actually teaching resources but very useful for researching papers. BFI is one of the most respected film organizations; a resource for schools/colleges in the UK; they publish many books and the excellent film magazine "Sight and Sound."
Film Analysis Resources This incredible site is hosted by Yale University Film Studies department
Viewing and Watching Film Critically I'm not sure who Tim Dirks is but the materials covered here are either straight-forward understandings of concepts, some genre analysis on other pages, and links to other sites. It helps that this site has received commendations from other trusted sources (like the film critic Roger Ebert)
More films studies resources from Yale Library
Advertising Issues:
Gender Ads Resources for Dr. Scott A. Lukas' Gender courses as well as his introductory social science courses at Lake Tahoe Community College and Valparaiso University. Extensive website, with huge archives of primary and secondary sources.
Gender, Race and Ethnicity in Media Advertising University of Iowa's Communication Studies dept. has compiled this huge archive of links.
How to Read an Ad Dr. Scott A' Lukas put this together.
Gender Advertiosements Aimed at African Americans Originally published in the journal Sex Roles: A Journal of Research (Jan, 1999)
Female Gender Images in Adolescent Magazine Advertising Originally published in Australian Marketing Journal (11.1: 2003)
About-Face: Body Activism "About-Face's mission is to equip women and girls with tools to understand and resist the harmful stereotypes of women the media disseminates. There are three components to About-Face's program, Education into Action: media-literacy workshops, action groups, and this resource-filled web site. About-Face is based in San Francisco, California. Our workshops and action groups reach throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. Our web site, of course, is available the world over." This website includes many primary (the actual ads) and secondary sources (intepretative/evaluative resources).
A Sociological Analysis of Children's Television Advertising Put together by two senior sociology majors at St. Lawrence University in NY.
Popular Culture: Advertising
From Washtington State University's American Popular Culture Archive.
The Persuaders PBS Frontline documentary hosted by media theorist Douglas Rushkoff; includes many other resources.
Merchants of Cool PBS Frontline documentary hosted by media theorist Douglas Rushkoff; includes many other resources.
Reading Advertisements Newsweek Magazine Education
The Language of Advertising Claims John Padgett's University of Mississippi guide for his ENG 102 course.
The Language of Advertising Peter Sells and Sierra Gonzale on the Stanford University Website.
Adbusters' Spoof Ads Canadian magazine that is a center of culture jamming.
Tobacco Spoof Ads
Analysis of Advertisements (Daniel Chandler's semiotic guide to understanding ads)
Beauty and Body Image in the Media (Media Awareness Network guide)
The Devil Wears Prada:
Story Analysis of the Film
Sympathy for the She Devil Salon magazine article.
Fairy Tales:
Wikipedia: Fairy Tales Wikipedia is an online collection of articles which is authored and edited by many people (and includes critiques of the pieces when someone finds the objectionable/misleading). Should be used solely as a guide to thinking about a broad subject/theme, followed by your own research.
Fair Tales, Myths and Legends Francie Quaas-Berryman's for her Cerritos College ENG 100 courses
Fairy Tales and Script Analysis Very academic analysis mapping the structure of fairy tales.
Fairy Tales A. Waller Hastings's website for his students.
Theory & Method Written by Kevin Yee and hosted by Disney. Good intro to the various theories/methods used to analyze fairy tales.
Psychoanalysis and Fairy Tales Hosted by the Romanian Association of Pyschoanalysis--intro to this theoretical perspective.
Artist: Alex Grey
The Artwork of Alex Grey His personal/professional website.
The Visionary Art of Alex Grey
Alex Grey on YouTube
Alex Grey: Art and Spirit (an interview)
Alex Grey: Art, Love, Family, and Psychedelics
Marketing of Diet Pills/Prescription Drugs
Medicating Kids PBS Frontline documentary available online and more resources.
Diet Wars Frontline documentary.
Prescription Drug Ad Marketing Media Literacy Clearinghouse
Prescription Drugs: Concerns and Controversies of Direct-to-Consumer Advertisements Article posted at the American Medical Student Association site--originally published in Cornell Political Forum (May 1998)
Pornography:
American Porn PBS Frontline documentary online and more resources.
History of Sex in Cinema
Barbie Dolls:
Barbie Liberation Culture Jammers subverting Barbie and GI Joe.
Barbie Liberation Organization
Wikipedia: Barbie
War Movies
War and Anti-War Films Film Site overview of the genres.
Wikipedia: War Films
How to Evaluate War Movies and Questions to Help You Evaluate War Films and War is Hell Pass the Popcorn Center for Media Literacy
Remind me I have essays on this subject that I hand out to my film classes.
Music Piracy/Downloading Issues:
Recording Industry Association of America statement about piracy
American Federation of Musicians statement on music piracy
MUSIC PIRACY AND THE AUDIO HOME RECORDING ACT Duke Law and Technology Review (2002)
Is Music Piracy Stealing? Applelinks
‘Golden Age of Free Music’ vs ‘Copying is Stealing’ Published at The Register (2003)
The Music Piracy Myth Tim O' Reilly is founder and CEO of O'Reilly Media a computer book publishing company.
Music Piracy Defendents Fighting Back The National Law Journal (2005)
Cultures of Music Piracy International Jouirnal of Cultural Studies (2004)
Celebrity Culture:
Wikipedia: Celebrity Culture
World History Site: Dysfunctional Celebrities
Media and Rise of Celebrity Culture Amy Henderson is a historian at the National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution. First published in OAH Magazine of History 6 (Spring 1992)
The Culture Celebrity Essay by Joseph Epstein in the Weekly Standard. Good introduction to some of the people writing and thinking about it.
Hypertrophic Celebrity MC Journal (2004)
The Culture of Celebrity: An Annotated Bibliography Compiled byy students at the College of New Jersey. Very helpful!
Alcohol Advertising:
Yahoo Collection of Alcohol Ads
Alcohol Advertising and Youth Also visit the main site of The Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth at Georgetown University
Stanford University online collection of 55 Alcohol Ads
SUNY Potsdam University: Alcohol Advertising
Analyszing Alcohol Advertisements and Marketing Frank Baker for Media Literacy Clearinghouse
Alcohol Advertising and Youth Marin Institute
Wikipedia: Alcohol Advertising
Adbusters: Spoof Ads Has a section spoofing/critiquing alcohol ads.
Online Communities:
Wikipedia: Social Network
Social Networking Blog Survey of the culture online
Howard Rheingold New Media theorist
Smart Mobs Website inspired by Rheingold's book.
Taking the "You" Out of YouTube Critique by media theorist Henry Jenkins.
Who Profits from User Created Content By Rheingold
DIY Media Weblog Hosted by the USC Annenberg Center
Wikipedia: Virtual Community
Online Community Toolkits Full Circle Associates--a consulting group.
News/Journalism Issues
Columbia Journalism Review Important magazine that covers the world of journalism
The News War PBS Frontline documentary available online and more resources.
Critical Media Studies: Journalism Resources
Project Censored An essential archival guide to the major news stories that are regularly censored or ignored by mainstream/corporate media news agencies. They do an annual collection of the year's top 25 censored news stories. Check out the 2007 edition and the archive of of past annual reports They also have a good archive of Alternative News Sources available online
Wikipedia: Topics in Journalism
Propaganda:
Propaganda Critic Very useful guide to the basic concepts from The Institute for Propaganda Analysis.
Public Relations (PR) Watch and SourceWatch and Public Relations Industry and Propaganda Techniques and Propaganda Hosted by the Center for Media and Democracy
Wikipedia: Propaganda
Nancy Snow Leading critic of the American cultural and political propaganda techniques used worldwide. Check out her Ten Things Everyone Should Know About Propaganda and Propaganda News
Propaganda, Pop Culture and Public Diplomacy
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Vittorio Giacci: Cinema, Responsibility and Formation
Cinema, Responsibility and Formation
by Vittorio Giacci
Cinemascope
...
Cinema is the most suitable form of art and communication to represent the society we live in, and hence it is fully sffected by the argumentations ... of freedom and responsibility.
But there is a warning: when we enter the area of communication, things become even more tricky as it is evident that one of the hard-won principles, is exactly is the one that concerns the value of the freedom of expression, which, in order to be effective must be free of any conditions.
Any restriction of this freedom would in fact evoke the ghosts of censorship which has caused much suffering to the arts in general and cinema in particular. I am thinking of the films made by Fellini, Antonioni, Visconti, Pasolini (to name but a few) whose works, today considered authentic masterpieces, have had a lot of problems with the censorship system.
Nevertheless, we must make some cinema-specific reflections even on this non-negotiable principle.
Ulike other forms of artistic expression, cinema is an "industrial form of art": in order to express itself fully, it needs ever-greater financial investments. This means that author's artistic expression is conditioned right from the start-and it would be hypocritical not to admit this-by the capital invested. These capital sources can be motivated not just by the simple and legitimate desire for expression, but also by power groups, concentrations and lobbies of all sorts and backgrounds, who can use cinematographic media in instrumental way to advance particular interests that that have little or nothing to do with the noble-and general-principle of the freedom of expression.
To Read the Rest of This Essay
by Vittorio Giacci
Cinemascope
...
Cinema is the most suitable form of art and communication to represent the society we live in, and hence it is fully sffected by the argumentations ... of freedom and responsibility.
But there is a warning: when we enter the area of communication, things become even more tricky as it is evident that one of the hard-won principles, is exactly is the one that concerns the value of the freedom of expression, which, in order to be effective must be free of any conditions.
Any restriction of this freedom would in fact evoke the ghosts of censorship which has caused much suffering to the arts in general and cinema in particular. I am thinking of the films made by Fellini, Antonioni, Visconti, Pasolini (to name but a few) whose works, today considered authentic masterpieces, have had a lot of problems with the censorship system.
Nevertheless, we must make some cinema-specific reflections even on this non-negotiable principle.
Ulike other forms of artistic expression, cinema is an "industrial form of art": in order to express itself fully, it needs ever-greater financial investments. This means that author's artistic expression is conditioned right from the start-and it would be hypocritical not to admit this-by the capital invested. These capital sources can be motivated not just by the simple and legitimate desire for expression, but also by power groups, concentrations and lobbies of all sorts and backgrounds, who can use cinematographic media in instrumental way to advance particular interests that that have little or nothing to do with the noble-and general-principle of the freedom of expression.
To Read the Rest of This Essay
Hal Duncan: The Art of Life
(I've been thinking about the intertwining themes of aesthetics/politics in my film classes and this essay by Duncan gave me much to think about--I came across it b/c I am currently reading his novel Vellum: The Book of All Hours... highly recommended, challenging and rewarding. So in light of this my question is always... can aesthetics be divorced from politics? Is not our appreciation of what is beautiful, what is pleasing, what is sensible, always a political statement? As I navigate my neighborhood, my workplace, my community, my society, my world--I make asumptions, distinctions, conclusion... all based upon my understanding of the proper order of things, what is pleasing to me, what is beautiful--now I may stretch your common understanding of these terms... but if you relax for a moment and think... is not beauty/pleasure/sense-of-order [aesthetics] a political concept?)
The Art of Life
by Hal Duncan
Notes From the Geek Show
...
Aesthetics can adopt pragmatics as an aesthetic. We might find logic quite fascinating, heuristics quite intriguing. Our senses are structurings of symbols, symbolisations of structures, our attention drawn to raw material that comes with ready-made symbols or structures to make sense of, or that is ripe with perhaps random relationships that can be teased into pattern. When order and complexity in and of itself inspires affects of joy, when disorder disturbs us and making sense of it is satisfying, it's no surprise these tastes develop into principles, into an aesthetic where what we care about most is those systems of ordering the world with the modalities of must and must not, should and should not, could and could not, the informal logic of a suppositional calculus. Still, it is the fact that we care about this that really matters, the fact that it is an aesthetic judgement. At heart, with all our attempts to make sense of the world in this manner, the goal is still to make sense. The valuation of pragmatics is an aesthetic valuation.
In the end it's all about making sense, in all meanings of the term. We make sense of the world with sentience -- or rather, we should say, sentience is the act of making sense of the world. And the world, of course, includes ourselves, as beings living and breathing in it, so we make sense of ourselves also, with affect -- or rather, we should say, affect is the act of making sense of ourselves. And our sentience and our affect, being also features of the world, must also be made sense of. Like any art form, sentience works by creating patterns, points of tension and moments of release. Every sentient being is a composition of affects, its elements in conflict or balance, a fragmented unity. Making sense of that composition is like finding a title for a book, a story, or a section of an essay, finding a phrase or even just a word that can stand in for it, not summarizing it but symbolising it. That's where sentience becomes identity, in the sense of all that sensation being a whole, in the aestheme of self. And this, to me, is why aesthetic(s) means far more than just a "set of principles of good taste and appreciation of beauty" or the branch of philosophy which concerns itself with the questions of what constitutes art and beauty. Bullshit. What we're dealing with here is the very nature of identity, the self, what it means to be human. And the tools for investigating that from the ground up are right there in front of us, in our affect as aesthemes and the relationships between them. Not so much in front of us, actually, as within us.
To Read the Entire Essay
The Art of Life
by Hal Duncan
Notes From the Geek Show
...
Aesthetics can adopt pragmatics as an aesthetic. We might find logic quite fascinating, heuristics quite intriguing. Our senses are structurings of symbols, symbolisations of structures, our attention drawn to raw material that comes with ready-made symbols or structures to make sense of, or that is ripe with perhaps random relationships that can be teased into pattern. When order and complexity in and of itself inspires affects of joy, when disorder disturbs us and making sense of it is satisfying, it's no surprise these tastes develop into principles, into an aesthetic where what we care about most is those systems of ordering the world with the modalities of must and must not, should and should not, could and could not, the informal logic of a suppositional calculus. Still, it is the fact that we care about this that really matters, the fact that it is an aesthetic judgement. At heart, with all our attempts to make sense of the world in this manner, the goal is still to make sense. The valuation of pragmatics is an aesthetic valuation.
In the end it's all about making sense, in all meanings of the term. We make sense of the world with sentience -- or rather, we should say, sentience is the act of making sense of the world. And the world, of course, includes ourselves, as beings living and breathing in it, so we make sense of ourselves also, with affect -- or rather, we should say, affect is the act of making sense of ourselves. And our sentience and our affect, being also features of the world, must also be made sense of. Like any art form, sentience works by creating patterns, points of tension and moments of release. Every sentient being is a composition of affects, its elements in conflict or balance, a fragmented unity. Making sense of that composition is like finding a title for a book, a story, or a section of an essay, finding a phrase or even just a word that can stand in for it, not summarizing it but symbolising it. That's where sentience becomes identity, in the sense of all that sensation being a whole, in the aestheme of self. And this, to me, is why aesthetic(s) means far more than just a "set of principles of good taste and appreciation of beauty" or the branch of philosophy which concerns itself with the questions of what constitutes art and beauty. Bullshit. What we're dealing with here is the very nature of identity, the self, what it means to be human. And the tools for investigating that from the ground up are right there in front of us, in our affect as aesthemes and the relationships between them. Not so much in front of us, actually, as within us.
To Read the Entire Essay
Help Support Domestic Partner Benefits in Kentucky (Feb 26)
(Message from Aaron Hutson)
Friends,
Help support fairness by calling the on-air viewer line on Kentucky Tonight (1-800-494-7605) on Monday at 8:00 PM.
KENTUCKY TONIGHT
Monday, February 26 at 8:00 pm ET/7:00 CT on KET1
DOMESTIC PARTNER BENEFITS
Scheduled Guests:
Susan Carvalho, chair of the UK Domestic Partner Benefits Task Force
State Sen. Ernesto Scorsone, D-Lexington
State Sen. Vernie McGaha, R-Russell Springs
Martin Cothran, senior policy analyst for The Family Foundation of Kentucky
Senate Bill 152 proposes that only married heterosexual couples should be able to purchase health care for their partners or spouses through employer benefits programs. This bill is proposed right when UK is on the verge of making a decision about domestic partnership benefits.
Help show legislators that you want to be able to purchase insurance for a domestic partner and let your employer make its own decisions about benefits packages -- ask them to vote NO to SB 152. Call the viewer line on Kentucky Tonight at 1-800-494-7605.
If you can't get reach the viewer line on Kentucky Tonight you can also leave a phone message for your legislator by calling 1-800-372-7181. For information on emailing your legislators visit
This Website
If you miss the program and would like to view it online or purchase a copy of the video please visit the KET website at
Here
Thank you for your support of the Kentucky Fairness Alliance Bluegrass Chapter. To learn more, get involved, or help support our efforts please visit
our our website
Friends,
Help support fairness by calling the on-air viewer line on Kentucky Tonight (1-800-494-7605) on Monday at 8:00 PM.
KENTUCKY TONIGHT
Monday, February 26 at 8:00 pm ET/7:00 CT on KET1
DOMESTIC PARTNER BENEFITS
Scheduled Guests:
Susan Carvalho, chair of the UK Domestic Partner Benefits Task Force
State Sen. Ernesto Scorsone, D-Lexington
State Sen. Vernie McGaha, R-Russell Springs
Martin Cothran, senior policy analyst for The Family Foundation of Kentucky
Senate Bill 152 proposes that only married heterosexual couples should be able to purchase health care for their partners or spouses through employer benefits programs. This bill is proposed right when UK is on the verge of making a decision about domestic partnership benefits.
Help show legislators that you want to be able to purchase insurance for a domestic partner and let your employer make its own decisions about benefits packages -- ask them to vote NO to SB 152. Call the viewer line on Kentucky Tonight at 1-800-494-7605.
If you can't get reach the viewer line on Kentucky Tonight you can also leave a phone message for your legislator by calling 1-800-372-7181. For information on emailing your legislators visit
This Website
If you miss the program and would like to view it online or purchase a copy of the video please visit the KET website at
Here
Thank you for your support of the Kentucky Fairness Alliance Bluegrass Chapter. To learn more, get involved, or help support our efforts please visit
our our website
Saturday, February 24, 2007
Lara Jakes Jordan: Anti-terror case data flawed
(Courtesy of the Rhetoricians for Peace listserv)
Audit: Anti-terror case data flawed
By LARA JAKES JORDAN, Associated Press Writer
Yahoo News
WASHINGTON - Federal prosecutors counted immigration violations, marriage fraud and drug trafficking among anti-terror cases in the four years after 9/11 even though no evidence linked them to terror activity, a Justice Department audit said Tuesday.
Overall, nearly all of the terrorism-related statistics on investigations, referrals and cases examined by department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine were either diminished or inflated. Only two of 26 sets of department data reported between 2001 and 2005 were accurate, the audit found.
Responding, a Justice spokesman pointed to figures showing that prosecutors in the department's headquarters for the most part either accurately or underreported their data — underscoring what he called efforts to avoid pumping up federal terror statistics.
The numbers, used to monitor the department's progress in battling terrorists, are reported to Congress and the public and help, in part, shape the department's budget.
"For these and other reasons, it is essential that the department report accurate terrorism-related statistics," the audit concluded.
Fine's office took care to say the flawed data appear to be the result of "decentralized and haphazard" methods of collection or disagreement over how the numbers are reported, and do not appear to be intentional.
Still, the errors led Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., to question whether the department had exaggerated the number of terror cases.
"If the Department of Justice can't even get their own books in order, how are we supposed to have any confidence they are doing the job they should be?" said Schumer, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which oversees the department. "Whether this is just an accounting error or an attempt to pad terror prosecution statistics for some other reason, the Department of Justice of all places should be classifying cases for what they are, not what they want us to think them to be."
Auditors looked at 26 categories of statistics — including numbers of suspects charged and convicted in terror cases, and terror-related threats against cities and other U.S. targets — compiled by the FBI, Justice's Criminal Division, and the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys.
It found that data from the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys were the most severely flawed. Auditors said the office, which compiles statistics from the 94 federal prosecutors' districts nationwide, both under- and over-counted the number of terror-related cases during a four-year period.
The office has since agreed to change the way it counts and classifies anti-terrorism cases, said department spokesman Dean Boyd.
Boyd denied suggestions that the department pumped up its numbers. He said Criminal Division prosecutors at Justice headquarters and the FBI have overhauled their respective case reporting systems since 2004 for a more accurate picture of terror-related workloads. Both agencies, he said, were strained to accurately report terrorism data in the flood of cases immediately after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
To Read the Rest of the Article
Audit: Anti-terror case data flawed
By LARA JAKES JORDAN, Associated Press Writer
Yahoo News
WASHINGTON - Federal prosecutors counted immigration violations, marriage fraud and drug trafficking among anti-terror cases in the four years after 9/11 even though no evidence linked them to terror activity, a Justice Department audit said Tuesday.
Overall, nearly all of the terrorism-related statistics on investigations, referrals and cases examined by department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine were either diminished or inflated. Only two of 26 sets of department data reported between 2001 and 2005 were accurate, the audit found.
Responding, a Justice spokesman pointed to figures showing that prosecutors in the department's headquarters for the most part either accurately or underreported their data — underscoring what he called efforts to avoid pumping up federal terror statistics.
The numbers, used to monitor the department's progress in battling terrorists, are reported to Congress and the public and help, in part, shape the department's budget.
"For these and other reasons, it is essential that the department report accurate terrorism-related statistics," the audit concluded.
Fine's office took care to say the flawed data appear to be the result of "decentralized and haphazard" methods of collection or disagreement over how the numbers are reported, and do not appear to be intentional.
Still, the errors led Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., to question whether the department had exaggerated the number of terror cases.
"If the Department of Justice can't even get their own books in order, how are we supposed to have any confidence they are doing the job they should be?" said Schumer, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which oversees the department. "Whether this is just an accounting error or an attempt to pad terror prosecution statistics for some other reason, the Department of Justice of all places should be classifying cases for what they are, not what they want us to think them to be."
Auditors looked at 26 categories of statistics — including numbers of suspects charged and convicted in terror cases, and terror-related threats against cities and other U.S. targets — compiled by the FBI, Justice's Criminal Division, and the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys.
It found that data from the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys were the most severely flawed. Auditors said the office, which compiles statistics from the 94 federal prosecutors' districts nationwide, both under- and over-counted the number of terror-related cases during a four-year period.
The office has since agreed to change the way it counts and classifies anti-terrorism cases, said department spokesman Dean Boyd.
Boyd denied suggestions that the department pumped up its numbers. He said Criminal Division prosecutors at Justice headquarters and the FBI have overhauled their respective case reporting systems since 2004 for a more accurate picture of terror-related workloads. Both agencies, he said, were strained to accurately report terrorism data in the flood of cases immediately after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
To Read the Rest of the Article
Press TV: Iraq war claims 800 Pentagon contractors' lives
(Courtesy of Juan Cole of Informed Comment)
Iraq war claims 800 Pentagon contractors' lives
Press TV
At least 800 civilians under contract to the Pentagon have been killed and more than 3,300 hurt in Iraq doing jobs normally handled by the U.S. military, AP reported Friday.
It is not clear how many of the employees are American but the casualty figures make it clear that the Defense Department's count of more than 3,100 U.S. military dead does not tell the whole story.
Employees of defense contractors such as Halliburton, Blackwater and Wackenhut cook meals, do laundry, repair infrastructure, translate documents, analyze intelligence, guard prisoners, protect military convoys, deliver water in the heavily fortified Green Zone and stand sentry at buildings - often highly dangerous duties almost identical to those performed by many U.S. troops.
The U.S. has outsourced so many war and reconstruction duties that there are almost as many contractors (120,000) as U.S. troops (135,000) in the war zone.
In January, four contractors for Blackwater were killed when their helicopter was downed by gunfire in Baghdad. In 2004, two Americans and a British engineer were kidnapped and decapitated. That same year, a mob of insurgents ambushed a supply convoy escorted by contractors, burning and mutilating the guards' bodies and stringing up two of them from a bridge.
Early in the war, most of the casualties on the coalition side were military. But with the fall of Saddam Hussein, contractors flowed in behind the troops, and the number of deaths among the contract workers has been increasing each year.
link
Iraq war claims 800 Pentagon contractors' lives
Press TV
At least 800 civilians under contract to the Pentagon have been killed and more than 3,300 hurt in Iraq doing jobs normally handled by the U.S. military, AP reported Friday.
It is not clear how many of the employees are American but the casualty figures make it clear that the Defense Department's count of more than 3,100 U.S. military dead does not tell the whole story.
Employees of defense contractors such as Halliburton, Blackwater and Wackenhut cook meals, do laundry, repair infrastructure, translate documents, analyze intelligence, guard prisoners, protect military convoys, deliver water in the heavily fortified Green Zone and stand sentry at buildings - often highly dangerous duties almost identical to those performed by many U.S. troops.
The U.S. has outsourced so many war and reconstruction duties that there are almost as many contractors (120,000) as U.S. troops (135,000) in the war zone.
In January, four contractors for Blackwater were killed when their helicopter was downed by gunfire in Baghdad. In 2004, two Americans and a British engineer were kidnapped and decapitated. That same year, a mob of insurgents ambushed a supply convoy escorted by contractors, burning and mutilating the guards' bodies and stringing up two of them from a bridge.
Early in the war, most of the casualties on the coalition side were military. But with the fall of Saddam Hussein, contractors flowed in behind the troops, and the number of deaths among the contract workers has been increasing each year.
link
Friday, February 23, 2007
Returning Soldiers Living in Poor Conditions at Walter Reed Hospital
(Thanks to the thursday night dinner radicals for filling me in on this...)
(Lets face it this administration and the military-industrial system do not care about the welfare of the soldiers when they are serving or when they come back from fighting.)
The original Washington Post report: Dana Priest and Anne Hull: Soldiers Face Neglect, Frustration At Army's Top Medical Facility
------------------------------------------------
Editorial: Facility robs soldiers of their hope, dignity
San Antonio Express-News
They come back bruised and battered, scarred by a war that has left some without arms and legs, others without hope and dignity.
It is not within the power of medical technology to give these men and women their limbs back.
It is, however, the responsibility of the government to preserve their hope and dignity — to treat them with the respect and compassion they deserve.
The government has not done that for all of them.
In a shocking series of recent articles, two Washington Post reporters exposed deplorable conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
With almost 700 patients recuperating from their wounds in Iraq and Afghanistan, the facility has been stretched, but neglect and incompetence have exacerbated the problem.
Here are some of the findings:
Mountains of paperwork prevent veterans from receiving proper care. One veteran, recuperating from debilitating injuries, was told he was being sent back to Iraq. Officials discovered the error before he could be redeployed.
Outpatient rooms are filthy, sometimes teeming with mice and cockroaches. One patient could see into the room above him because mold had rotted the drywall. His room was filled with mouse droppings.
Some patients leave the hospital without the compensation they deserve. One soldier suffered a head injury in Iraq, but doctors said test results from his school days indicate he was slow as a child. If he was so slow, his family countered, why did the Army accept him for duty?
The series has shaken up the Beltway. Maj. Gen. George W. Weightman told the Post that conditions would improve rapidly. And White House press secretary Tony Snow said he spoke with President Bush, who told him, "Find out what the problem is and fix it."
U.S. military personnel suffer enough on the battlefields. They should not have to return to more turmoil at home. The real tragedy is that it took a newspaper series to alert the military — and the government — to something it should have known already.
"We need to bring the Army people in and say, 'What the hell is going on?'" Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, told the House.
But outrage is not enough. It must lead to action.
Original Link
------------------------------------------
Democrats Admit It: We're Idiots
by Scott Thill
The Huffington Post
Every morning we get up and hear the same news over and over again, usually centering on one of two things: The Bush administration's could-give-a-fuck economic campaign to destroy civil liberties at home and abroad, and the Democrats utter inability to do anything of substance about it.
And while it has been a terrorizing streak, it has been easy to nail down, mostly because the too-white Republicans, the vice-president who runs the country and the puppet president who runs the liquor cabinet could care less about being accused of sheer hypocrisy. This is, after all, an administration that can't stop crowing about how much they support the maimed troops rotting away at Walter Reed, even as they send more off to die. An administration that warns us daily about the threat of Middle East terrorism while they sell our ports off to Dubai and inflame sectarian wars across the Iraq, Iran and, well, everywhere. An administration who says they'll fire anyone for compromising the national security of the nation, unless of course it's one of their own that does it, in which case they'll do nothing at all, so go fuck yourselves.
But then there are the sad-sack Democrats, who voters across the country in a fit of rage gave the keys to Congress and were rewarded with half-assed nonbinding resolutions that couldn't even make it past the Senate. And that's after they crowed about all they were going to do in 100 hours. After that? You're on your own suckers!
Why? Well for starters, Clinton and Obama have another whiny bitchfest on the docket, an election to plan for, and other non-essential extracurricular activities to attend to, all while those same soldiers rot away inside Walter Reed because of the war their sorry ilk rubber-stamped. Meanwhile, the jackass Joe Lieberman they thought would help Gore win the 2000 election ended up turning heel and finally becoming the worthless Republican we all knew he was. And they say Nader cost us the 2000 election. The fucking gall.
Is it any wonder the Bush administration steamrolled right over these pussies while implementing a PNAC plan for energy domination disguised as a urgent need to disarm a country we already knew had no WMD? Is it any wonder that these same losers now look back in anger at their 2002 War Authorization red carpet, not because it was wrong or stupid or easily damned, but because it might cost them an election in 2008?
And so it is without a hint of irony whatsoever that John Kerry, a grandfather clock on its last pendulum swing, recently complained in the Washington Post that he has "had enough of nonbinding" resolutions, or that the Democrats next chowderheaded chess move is to repeal that 2002 megablunder, five years and thousands of corpses too late. And sure, better late than never, but never is really what you get with the Democrats in this barely born new millennium. All it takes is one scan near the bottom of the Post's piece on the repeal to smack the optimists upside the head with a hyperreality check:
"More important, the legislation may include a waiver that the president or defense secretary could invoke to deploy troops who are not fully combat-ready, Democratic aides said. That way, the commander in chief's hands would not be tied."
Well, I feel better already. I'm sure the voters who turned out en masse to collectively call bullshit on the reign of Cheney and Bush the crashing buffoon want nothing more than their hands to be free to wreak even more havoc on the world, at the nation's expense. And what an expense: According to McClatchy, "The percentage of poor Americans who are living in severe poverty has reached a 32-year high, millions of working Americans are falling closer to the poverty line and the gulf between the nation's 'haves' and 'have-nots' continues to widen."
Think about that: A 32-year high. At the beginning of this administration's reign, we had an economic surplus. Ever since the Democrats enabled this thieving band of corporate criminals, we've moved it into Exxon and Halliburton's pockets and screwed everyone else in the process. Look, the comb-licking Paul Wolfowitz is on his way back to Iraq right now, coming back into the fold like the neocon prodigal son we all knew he was. And just what do you think he's going to do when he gets there? What else? Ask the Government Accountability Project:
"'This is exactly what he shouldn't be doing and what the [World Bank] board was initially afraid that he would do, which is to use the financial resources of the World Bank to take some of the heat off the U.S. Treasury and U.S. policy,' Bea Edwards of the Washington-based watchdog group Government Accountability Project told IPS. In a previous statement, Edwards argued that 'Wolfowitz's apparent determination to use the World Bank to further questionable American military goals in the Middle East is a fundamental distortion of the Bank's mission, a violation of its founding Articles of Agreement, and a reckless waste of donor resources.'"
And so another day passes, and the sea levels rise higher than expected. Exponology goes into overdrive, and the grift goes on. Meanwhile, the Democrats decide to use what precious time we have left on this planet to revisit a monumental fuck-up that happened years ago, in another lifetime practially, when they decided to rely on the national intelligence rather than their own.
I may be relatively young, but I've been a political animal since I could talk. And I have never been as ashamed of my country, my party or my politicians in my entire life. And you should be too, whether you're in on the grift or not. So I'm asking you to do something about it. Go Howard Beale on these mutherfuckers. Prank them, spank them, Sherman tank them, but do not sit idly by anymore while they ruin what wondrous possibility is left in this country as climate change encroaches and liars breed like roaches. This country talks the talk, but will it walk the walk? Is it truly for the people, by the people? Or is it another Rome, whose spectacular fall is mere seconds away, lost in a soup of hyperreal distraction? You decide.
The Link
-----------------------------------
More reports:
More Reports
(Lets face it this administration and the military-industrial system do not care about the welfare of the soldiers when they are serving or when they come back from fighting.)
The original Washington Post report: Dana Priest and Anne Hull: Soldiers Face Neglect, Frustration At Army's Top Medical Facility
------------------------------------------------
Editorial: Facility robs soldiers of their hope, dignity
San Antonio Express-News
They come back bruised and battered, scarred by a war that has left some without arms and legs, others without hope and dignity.
It is not within the power of medical technology to give these men and women their limbs back.
It is, however, the responsibility of the government to preserve their hope and dignity — to treat them with the respect and compassion they deserve.
The government has not done that for all of them.
In a shocking series of recent articles, two Washington Post reporters exposed deplorable conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
With almost 700 patients recuperating from their wounds in Iraq and Afghanistan, the facility has been stretched, but neglect and incompetence have exacerbated the problem.
Here are some of the findings:
Mountains of paperwork prevent veterans from receiving proper care. One veteran, recuperating from debilitating injuries, was told he was being sent back to Iraq. Officials discovered the error before he could be redeployed.
Outpatient rooms are filthy, sometimes teeming with mice and cockroaches. One patient could see into the room above him because mold had rotted the drywall. His room was filled with mouse droppings.
Some patients leave the hospital without the compensation they deserve. One soldier suffered a head injury in Iraq, but doctors said test results from his school days indicate he was slow as a child. If he was so slow, his family countered, why did the Army accept him for duty?
The series has shaken up the Beltway. Maj. Gen. George W. Weightman told the Post that conditions would improve rapidly. And White House press secretary Tony Snow said he spoke with President Bush, who told him, "Find out what the problem is and fix it."
U.S. military personnel suffer enough on the battlefields. They should not have to return to more turmoil at home. The real tragedy is that it took a newspaper series to alert the military — and the government — to something it should have known already.
"We need to bring the Army people in and say, 'What the hell is going on?'" Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, told the House.
But outrage is not enough. It must lead to action.
Original Link
------------------------------------------
Democrats Admit It: We're Idiots
by Scott Thill
The Huffington Post
Every morning we get up and hear the same news over and over again, usually centering on one of two things: The Bush administration's could-give-a-fuck economic campaign to destroy civil liberties at home and abroad, and the Democrats utter inability to do anything of substance about it.
And while it has been a terrorizing streak, it has been easy to nail down, mostly because the too-white Republicans, the vice-president who runs the country and the puppet president who runs the liquor cabinet could care less about being accused of sheer hypocrisy. This is, after all, an administration that can't stop crowing about how much they support the maimed troops rotting away at Walter Reed, even as they send more off to die. An administration that warns us daily about the threat of Middle East terrorism while they sell our ports off to Dubai and inflame sectarian wars across the Iraq, Iran and, well, everywhere. An administration who says they'll fire anyone for compromising the national security of the nation, unless of course it's one of their own that does it, in which case they'll do nothing at all, so go fuck yourselves.
But then there are the sad-sack Democrats, who voters across the country in a fit of rage gave the keys to Congress and were rewarded with half-assed nonbinding resolutions that couldn't even make it past the Senate. And that's after they crowed about all they were going to do in 100 hours. After that? You're on your own suckers!
Why? Well for starters, Clinton and Obama have another whiny bitchfest on the docket, an election to plan for, and other non-essential extracurricular activities to attend to, all while those same soldiers rot away inside Walter Reed because of the war their sorry ilk rubber-stamped. Meanwhile, the jackass Joe Lieberman they thought would help Gore win the 2000 election ended up turning heel and finally becoming the worthless Republican we all knew he was. And they say Nader cost us the 2000 election. The fucking gall.
Is it any wonder the Bush administration steamrolled right over these pussies while implementing a PNAC plan for energy domination disguised as a urgent need to disarm a country we already knew had no WMD? Is it any wonder that these same losers now look back in anger at their 2002 War Authorization red carpet, not because it was wrong or stupid or easily damned, but because it might cost them an election in 2008?
And so it is without a hint of irony whatsoever that John Kerry, a grandfather clock on its last pendulum swing, recently complained in the Washington Post that he has "had enough of nonbinding" resolutions, or that the Democrats next chowderheaded chess move is to repeal that 2002 megablunder, five years and thousands of corpses too late. And sure, better late than never, but never is really what you get with the Democrats in this barely born new millennium. All it takes is one scan near the bottom of the Post's piece on the repeal to smack the optimists upside the head with a hyperreality check:
"More important, the legislation may include a waiver that the president or defense secretary could invoke to deploy troops who are not fully combat-ready, Democratic aides said. That way, the commander in chief's hands would not be tied."
Well, I feel better already. I'm sure the voters who turned out en masse to collectively call bullshit on the reign of Cheney and Bush the crashing buffoon want nothing more than their hands to be free to wreak even more havoc on the world, at the nation's expense. And what an expense: According to McClatchy, "The percentage of poor Americans who are living in severe poverty has reached a 32-year high, millions of working Americans are falling closer to the poverty line and the gulf between the nation's 'haves' and 'have-nots' continues to widen."
Think about that: A 32-year high. At the beginning of this administration's reign, we had an economic surplus. Ever since the Democrats enabled this thieving band of corporate criminals, we've moved it into Exxon and Halliburton's pockets and screwed everyone else in the process. Look, the comb-licking Paul Wolfowitz is on his way back to Iraq right now, coming back into the fold like the neocon prodigal son we all knew he was. And just what do you think he's going to do when he gets there? What else? Ask the Government Accountability Project:
"'This is exactly what he shouldn't be doing and what the [World Bank] board was initially afraid that he would do, which is to use the financial resources of the World Bank to take some of the heat off the U.S. Treasury and U.S. policy,' Bea Edwards of the Washington-based watchdog group Government Accountability Project told IPS. In a previous statement, Edwards argued that 'Wolfowitz's apparent determination to use the World Bank to further questionable American military goals in the Middle East is a fundamental distortion of the Bank's mission, a violation of its founding Articles of Agreement, and a reckless waste of donor resources.'"
And so another day passes, and the sea levels rise higher than expected. Exponology goes into overdrive, and the grift goes on. Meanwhile, the Democrats decide to use what precious time we have left on this planet to revisit a monumental fuck-up that happened years ago, in another lifetime practially, when they decided to rely on the national intelligence rather than their own.
I may be relatively young, but I've been a political animal since I could talk. And I have never been as ashamed of my country, my party or my politicians in my entire life. And you should be too, whether you're in on the grift or not. So I'm asking you to do something about it. Go Howard Beale on these mutherfuckers. Prank them, spank them, Sherman tank them, but do not sit idly by anymore while they ruin what wondrous possibility is left in this country as climate change encroaches and liars breed like roaches. This country talks the talk, but will it walk the walk? Is it truly for the people, by the people? Or is it another Rome, whose spectacular fall is mere seconds away, lost in a soup of hyperreal distraction? You decide.
The Link
-----------------------------------
More reports:
More Reports
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)