Lee Tien: Common Sense and Security -- Body Scanners, Accountability, and $2.4 Billion Worth of Security Theater

Common Sense and Security: Body Scanners, Accountability, and $2.4 Billion Worth of Security Theater
by Lee Tien
Electronic Frontier Foundation

The Transportation Security Administration is feeling public heat these days over its combination of whole-body-image scanners and heavy-handed pat-down searches, and deservedly so.

There’s no question that reform is needed to curtail TSA’s excesses. We especially applaud the Electronic Privacy Information Center’s efforts to increase public awareness about the body scanners. But will the heat now being generated produce the kind of light we really need?

Consider, for instance, the all-too-common response that we need to
accept the indignity and invasiveness of the body scanners and pat-down searches in order to be safer. That response assumes that body scanners actually make us safer — a dubious assumption that we explore below.

Do Body Scanners Address the Problem They Were Intended to Address?
Unlikely.

Body scanners are touted as a solution to the problem of detecting explosive devices that evade traditional metal detectors. The recent hard push for body scanners took off after Christmas 2009, when the so-called "underwear bomber," Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, attempted to board an airplane while allegedly concealing in his underpants a package containing nearly 3 oz of the chemical powder PETN (pentaerythritol tetranitrate). Within a few days, Sen. Joseph Lieberman called for more widespread use of the full-body scanners.

Indeed, TSA Administrator John Pistole told Congress last week that body scanners (which TSA calls Advanced Imaging Technology, or AIT) are "the most effective technology for detecting small threat items concealed on passengers, such as explosives used by Abdulmutallab."

Yet there’s no publicly available evidence that body scanners counter the threat from explosive powders. What we do know makes us extremely skeptical.

•A TSA document, which EPIC obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, shows that the scanners were intended to detect weapons, traditional explosives (C4, plastique, etc.), and liquids — but not powder (page 10).

•The Government Accountability Office (GAO) says that "it remains unclear whether the AIT would have detected the weapon used in the December 2009 incident based on the preliminary information the GAO has received."

•Ben Wallace, a member of Parliament who was formerly involved in a project to develop the scanners for airport use, said trials had shown that materials such as powder, liquid or thin plastic — as well as the passenger's clothing — went undetected. According to Wallace, the millimeter waves pass through low-density materials. High-density material such as metal knives, guns and dense plastic such as C4 explosive reflect the millimeter waves and leave an image of the object. He added that X-ray scanners were also unlikely to have detected the Christmas Day bomb.

•German border police recently reported folds in clothing were confusing the body scanners used at Hamburg Airport (the L-3 ProVision Automatic Threat Detection system). "NDR radio said the devices, introduced in September, had repeatedly given warnings about innocent passengers, mainly because of folds in clothes. It quoted guards saying the devices were unreliable in scanning through many layers of clothing too."

The Real Costs of Security Theater

Even assuming that there were some security value to the body scanners, an obvious question remains: are they worth it? The scanners cost about $170,000 each. The number of scanners jumped from 40 at the start of this year to 373 installed at 68 airports across the USA as of last week. The TSA is scheduled to deploy 500 scanners by December 31, and a total of 1,000 by the end of 2011. The GAO estimates the direct costs over their expected 7-year-life cycle at $2.4 billion. That doesn’t include the costs to passengers, such as missed flights and lost dignity.

A former chief security officer of the Israel Airport Authority who helped design the security at Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion International Airport the scanners are "expensive and useless . . . That's why we haven't put them in our airport."

To Read the Rest of the Commentary

Friends of Tortuga

Website for the long-standing anarchist collective household in Jackson Heights, Queens that was raided by a Joint Terrorism force after the recent Pittsburgh G20 Summit. Members were arrested, the house was searched/ransacked, and anything that looked faintly subversive was seized—famously a needlepoint of Lenin was included… Eventually all charges were dropped … it was initiated because two Tortuga members were using Twitter to communicate police announcements over the publicly accessible/available police scanner. Ironically this was the same tactic/technology that the Obama administration celebrated months earlier when used by Iranian activists. Is it a crime to twitter/text public information?

Friends of Tortuga

Best of the Left #361: The Police State Welcomes You (Immigration)

#361 The Police State Welcomes You (Immigration)
Best of the Left

Act 1: Boycotting AZ, teas and otherwise – Wait wait don’t tell me
Song 1: Tea for the Tillerman – Cat Stevens

Act 2: AZ law spurs immigration reform – Rachel Maddow
Song 2: Different People – No Doubt

Act 3: AZ Sheriff rips new law – Young Turks
Song 3: Stand – R.E.M.

Act 4: Law and Border – Daily Show
Song 4: I miss you – Blink 182

Act 5: O’Reilly grasping to support AZ law – Counterspin
Song 5: See you on the other side – Ozzy Osbourn

Act 6: Papers please amendments – Rachel Maddow
Song 6: Bouncing around the room – Phish

Act 7: The word – No Problemo – Colbert Report
Song 7: Mexico – The Refreshments

Act 8: Wrongful arrests happens already – Young Turks
Song 8: Still crazy after all these years – Paul Simon

Act 9: Police State Pete – Mark Fiore
Song 9: What I’m looking for – Brendan Benson

Act 10: AZ law writers are liars, racists – Rachel Maddow

To Listen to the Episode

March 4th, 2010: Police Attack 880 Interstate Takeover

Police beat unarmed student protesters in California. They also do nothing to corporate media representatives and arrest independent media reporters: