(Courtesy of George Micajah Phillips)
Study Great Ideas, but Teach to the Test
By Michael Winerip
New York Times
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich.
BECKY KARNES, a high school English teacher, recently completed a graduate-level writing course that she loved at Grand Valley State University.
"The course taught us better ways to teach writing to kids," said Ms. Karnes, a 16-year veteran who is finishing up her master's degree. "It showed you ways to stretch kids' minds. I learned so much, I had my eyes opened about how to teach writing."
Ms. Karnes learned all sorts of exercises to get children excited about writing, get them writing daily about what they care about and then show them how they can take one of those short, personal pieces and use it as the nucleus for a sophisticated, researched essay.
"We learned how to develop good writing from the inside, starting with calling the child's voice out," said Ms. Karnes, who got an A in the university course. "One of the major points was, good writing is good thinking. That's why writing formulas don't work. Formulas don't let kids think; they kill a lot of creativity in writing."
And so, when Ms. Karnes returns to Allendale High School to teach English this fall, she will use the new writing techniques she learned and abandon the standard five-paragraph essay formula. Right?
"Oh, no," said Ms. Karnes. "There's no time to do creative writing and develop authentic voice. That would take weeks and weeks. There are three essays on the state test and we start prepping right at the start of the year. We have to teach to the state test" (the Michigan Educational Assessment Program, known as MEAP).
"MEAP is not what writing is about, but it's what testing is about," Ms. Karnes said. "And we know if we teach them the five-paragraph essay formula, they'll pass that test. There's a lot of pressure to do well on MEAP. It makes the district seem good, helps real estate values."
In Michigan, there is added pressure. If students pass the state tests, they receive $2,500 college scholarships, and in Ms. Karnes's middle-class district, families need that money. "I can't see myself fighting against MEAP," she said. "It would hurt my students too much. It's a dilemma. It may not be the best writing, but it gets them the money."
In this fashion, the five-paragraph essay has become the law of the land: introductory paragraph; three supporting paragraphs, each with its own topic sentence as well as three supporting ideas; and summary paragraph
Students lose points for writing a one-sentence paragraph.
Many English teachers have developed a standard five-paragraph form with blanks to fill in.
Topic sentence:__________.
Literary example:_________.
Historical example:_________.
Current event:__________.
Concluding sentence:_________.
The National Council of Teachers of English has warned that standardized state tests mandated by the federal No Child Left Behind law, as well as the College Board's new SAT writing sample, are actually hurting the teaching of writing in this country. For their part, the makers of these tests emphasize that they don't mandate a writing formula, and they, too, say it would be a mistake if schools taught only by the formula.
But Nancy Patterson, the Grand Valley professor who offers the popular course for teachers here, says in the face of those tests, teachers cling to the formula and it spreads like kudzu. "A lot, particularly the younger ones, have been raised on the five-paragraph formula, and are insecure about their own writing," she said. "They drink up what we do here, but then go back to teach to the test. It shuts them down. It narrows the curriculum."
"If you give kids the formula to write an essay, you're taking away the very thinking that a writer engages in," she said. "Kids are less apt to develop a writer's thinking skills." And it is spreading downward. In preparation for the fourth-grade state writing test, she said, she sees third-grade teachers pressed to use the five-paragraph formula. A teacher in Dr. Patterson's class described her frustration over a practice essay test in her district asking third graders to "defend or refute from a patriotic standpoint" whether a friend should go to a Memorial Day parade. "For 9-year-olds?" said Dr. Patterson. "Defend or refute?"
Dr. Patterson has her teachers write in every class - something she did with her students during 29 years in the public schools. They draw maps of their neighborhoods, then write a story of something that happened there. They envision a character they'd like to create, make a paper doll of it, then pair up with another student and together write a story with the two characters interacting.
"You're teaching them narrative - how to tell stories that are dear to them," she said. She has them read good essays that start a hundred different ways - with a quote; a question; a simple declaration of a problem; a run-on sentence; a word or two. There are lessons on how a writer blows up an important moment and how to turn a personal piece of writing into a researched essay.
RECENTLY, Kristen Covelle, 24, has been going on interviews for English teaching jobs. She mentions exciting things she's learned from Dr. Patterson. "The interview will be going great," Ms. Covelle said, "and then MEAP will come up. They want to know will I teach to the test, that's what they're looking for. They asked how I feel about using "I" in writing. Would there ever be a case when "I" is appropriate in an essay. I knew the answer they want - you're not supposed to use it. But I couldn't say that. I said there could be times, you just can't close the door. They didn't say anything but it was definitely the low point of the interview."
Ms. Karnes isn't totally against the formula. "For kids struggling, if you can give them a formula and they fill in the blanks, some will pass the MEAP test who wouldn't otherwise," she said. "But it turns into a prison. It stops you from finding a kid's potential."
She loves the last month of school, when state tests are over, she said. Last spring she did lessons on poetry and writing short stories. "I found interests and talents in those kids I didn't know were there," she said. "It would have been nice to have a whole year to build on those things."
Article Link
From British Columbia's The Tyee:
Canada also emphasizes the test over the thinking, but China decides that Rote memorization kills creativity--who is making the right move?
1 comment:
I really believe that we need a major overhaul of our educational system, but the problem is, I can not see how to do it on a practical level. Therefore, I see the standardized tests, etc and say ok, here's the game my kids are going to have to play in school, and I will teach them what I want them to really learn - awareness and empathy, critical thinking, logic, three Rs, finances, love of reading, to name a few. I used to think "fighting the system" would be better, but in the end, it's probably not. When I went to school, I always took the AP and advanced classes. I probably will limit my oldest son's participation in those kinds of classes because you are competing against the "best" and everything is on a curve, and all the colleges seem to look at these days is GPA, SAT, extracurriculars. So 3.8 in all advanced classes sometimes doesn't hold up against a 4.0 in all average classes. Stupid, but true.
I once knew a person who had come from Vietnam. He was from an "elite" family over there, and we had many a discussion on how school was for him over there vs here. He said their exams could take days. They were given big problems that they needed to solve. So they learned to really think about big problems, parse them, solve them, not this "you have 45 minutes to solve these 100 problems" kind of crap. No wonder our children have the attention spans of fleas. We teach them all problems are solvable in about 30-60 mins. Hmmm, maybe this all ties into my response to the "changing the minds" post. If our children are not taught to think critically, why would they do it as adults?
Post a Comment