I recently mentioned a controversy over academic blogging spawned by Tribble's critique of academics who blog. One of the better posts exploring the implications of Tribble's essay is by El Oso:
Pitching Outside the Strike Zone, Part IV
Some other commentators on this subject:
Savage Minds: Insider/Outsider Troubles
Apophenia: Bloggers Need Not Apply
Capital Hacks: Job Searching With a Blog
Bitch Ph.D.: This Right Here Is Why I Don't Blog Under My Real Name
One Man's Opinion: Anti-Blogging in Academia
Planned Obsolescence: Bloggers Need Not Apply
Lawyers, Guns and Markets: Blogs and the Market
Daniel W. Drezner: Grad Students-No Blogs Allowed
Chaz Blogs: "As a hiring manager for a recent project ..."
Academic Coach: Going Too Far ... Disacknowledgements cont.," (about another fascinating controversy that leads to a mention of Tribble's article)
George's Employment Blawg: Blogger's Disadvantaged in the Hiring Process
Bar Blog: Bloggers Need Not Apply
----------------------------------------------------
What I think is most important and should not be missed in this controversy is that blogs, and the Internet in general, are a threat to the monopoly that the Ivory Tower has long had on knowledge production. Never have I seen so much direct, concentrated effort applied to understanding, interpreting and communicating meaning associated with texts/images, social life and political events than I do in the blogosphere. This is what threatens needling bureaucrats like Ivan Tribble...
Bloggers I salute you!
1 comment:
Harry,
Thanks, I just signed up yesterday and was looking for an avatar... truly appreciated.
Post a Comment