Wednesday, January 05, 2005

Questions That Should Be Asked at Spelling's Senate Confirmation Hearing Tomorrow

A Final Test For Spellings
by Robert Borosage and Earl Hadley
Tom Paine

If the Senate's doing its job, Bush's pick for education secretary should face some tough questions tomorrow.
...
After gaining bipartisan support for passage of the No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration broke its own promise to provide the funds to help schools meet the challenge. And Secretary Rodney Paige bungled management of the law, equating the criticisms coming from teachers in the classroom with treason, and accusing teachers of belonging to a "terrorist organization."

Now Bush seeks to replace Paige with the person who has been pulling the strings all along: Margaret Spellings, a former White House domestic policy adviser and longtime Bush loyalist. Hearings on the Spellings nomination take place tomorrow, but she's already been given the nod by Sen. Kennedy and other key Democratic senators. But before the Senate confirms the nomination, senators would be wise to probe whether the trail of broken promises, bungled administration and distorted priorities will continue. Here are a few common-sense questions that American parents have the right to know.


Entire Article

Janus Head: Addiction II

Janus Head (what a great title!) has just published their second special theme issue on Addiction. I've battled various addictions from the benign to the destructive and have long reflected on addiction which is so much a part of the human condition and how addiction defines/molds/illuminates/mutates/destroys:

Janus Head

and here is the earlier issue:

Addiction I

Tuesday, January 04, 2005

Latest Monstrosity From Texas

Texas Governor Rick Perry in a supreme act of hubris wants to build a superhighway that will be a 1/4 mile wide and cut across the Texas landscape, complete with underground fueling stations...

Texas Thinking Big on Transportation
By Lianne Hart Times Staff Writer
Yahoo

Do not mistake the Trans-Texas Corridor for a mere superhighway. As imagined by Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the $175-billion project will be a transportation behemoth of mind-boggling proportions: 4,000 miles of mostly toll lanes perhaps a quarter-mile wide, capable of carrying cars, trucks, and high-speed freight and commuter trains.

There would be room underground for oil, water, electric and gas pipelines, and the whole works would be built largely with private money. "It's a blueprint for our transportation and population needs for the next 50 years," Texas Department of Transportation spokeswoman Gaby Garcia said. "It's the wave of the future to plan for different modes [of transport] in one corridor."

Opponents call the ambitious scheme ill-conceived and absurdly expensive. "It's so grandiose and outlandish that people at first didn't think it would happen," said David Stall, who founded a group called Corridor Watch to keep tabs on the project. "But they're railroading it through — and most Texans don't even know what it is."

Perry introduced what he called a "visionary transportation plan" during his 2002 reelection campaign, and continued to push for it after he was sworn in. In 2003, he signed a transportation bill that authorized construction of the mammoth roadway. The corridor is meant to ease congestion on existing interstates by diverting long-distance and regional traffic onto mega-highways, which would largely skirt urban areas. Trucks carrying hazardous materials could bypass populated cities by traveling on the new system.

"We can slowly try to address traffic in cities with very expensive Band-Aids, which means making four lanes into six or eight," said state Rep. Mike Krusee, who wrote legislation to make the corridor possible. "But wouldn't it be cheaper to build basically a parallel corridor, where land is cheaper and there's room to expand?"

Backers say the project is badly needed in Texas because of a rapidly growing population and increased traffic from a post-NAFTA flow of goods to and from Mexico. The linchpin of the plan is its financing: Though the state would own the right of way to the roads, private contractors would pay to build them. In return, the contractors could charge concessions — such as tolls — for as long as 50 years. Similar projects in other countries have been financed this way, Krusee said, and it is how the Texas Department of Transportation intends to do it.

"Our problems are urgent in Texas, but we don't have the money to do this sort of thing," said Krusee, who is chairman of the state House Transportation Committee. "By putting it up for bid from private companies, it's a way for growth to pay for itself." In mid-December, the state Department of Transportation agreed to let a private consortium led by Spanish toll-road operator Cintra build the first section of the corridor — a $6-billion, 316-mile turnpike from Dallas to San Antonio.

As part of the deal, the group will add $1.2 billion more for other state transportation projects, Garcia said. In return, the consortium will be allowed to charge tolls on the road at rates approved by the state. The Dallas-San Antonio toll road will be part of an 800-mile corridor that will run parallel to Interstate 35 from Oklahoma to Mexico. Other potential corridors could run east-west from the Texas Gulf Coast to El Paso and north-south from the Panhandle to Laredo.

Stall is skeptical of the Cintra deal, reserving judgment until the contract becomes public, assuming it ever does. "They say no state dollars will go into the corridors, and that may be semantically true. But someone who is investing billions of dollars expects to get their money back and more, and ultimately Texans will pay for it through tolls and other concessions," Stall said.

The Trans-Texas Corridor is a revenue-raising plan masquerading as transportation development, Stall said. The state can acquire private land for the roads through the power of eminent domain, then sell or lease the property for any purpose — whether it's for the highway, a gas station, restaurant or a billboard. "The state is using its powers to create a monopoly [along the corridor] for the state and concessionaires," Stall said.

Texas economist Ray Perryman has estimated that the project could generate about $135 billion for the state over 50 years. But Stall is not alone in his objections. Environmentalists are concerned about the effect of massive construction on rural lands. And members of the Texas Farm Bureau — who generally support Perry, who was raised on a West Texas farm — voted to oppose the plan.

"The roads will split through farms," bureau spokesman Mike Barnett said. "The way we understand it, it will spread over a number of miles, so it will be hard to get from one side of the farm to another." With minimal exits, the corridor will cut off access to many rural towns already economically pinched, he said. "They're talking about a quarter-mile swath through wherever it goes. That hurts. You lose the tax base because the land goes to the state," Barnett said.

Marc Maxwell, city manager of Sulphur Springs — population 14,551 — in northeast Texas, said his town "lucked out" during the Cintra negotiations. It appears the corridor will come by his city, bringing more trade to local businesses, he said. But Maxwell worries about Texans getting a fair price for their land, and the fate of rural towns bypassed in construction. "The state has got their backs against the wall. They've got to do something about the demand for more roads," he said. "But these are huge stakes, with huge implications positive and negative. You hope this is the right thing."

Article Link

Sunday, January 02, 2005

fem * mass: The Personal Websites of the Female Masses

Huge archive of female bloggers. Website description:

No commercial sites. No men. No fluff. Just the Real Deal. You can leave those preconceived notions at the door because nobody here hides behind a webpage. And nobody here substitutes a personality with a list of links.

fem•mass is dedicated to the women of the Web whose personal websites shine. Have you lost your way? Well, just hang on to that keyboard, little mama. These pages are gonna bring you home.


fem * mass

Censored 2005: The Top 25 Censored Media Stories of 2003-2004

Project Censored 2005

Includes:

#1: Wealth Inequality in 21st Century Threatens Economy and Democracy

#2: Ashcroft vs. the Human Rights Law that Holds Corporations Accountable

#3: Bush Administration Censors Science

#4: High Levels of Uranium Found in Troops and Civilians

#5: The Wholesale Giveaway of Our Natural Resources

#6: The Sale of Electoral Politics

#7: Conservative Organization Drives Judicial Appointments

#8: Cheney's Energy Task Force and The Energy Policy

#9: Widow Brings RICO Case Against U.S. government for 9/11

#10: New Nuke Plants: Taxpayers Support, Industry Profits

#11: The Media Can Legally Lie

#12: The Destabilization of Haiti

#13: Schwarzenegger Met with Enron's Ken Lay Years Before the California Recall

#14: New Bill Threatens Intellectual Freedom in Area Studies

#15: U.S. Develops Lethal New Viruses

#16: Law Enforcement Agencies Spy on Innocent Citizens

#17: U.S. Government Represses Labor Unions in Iraq in Quest for Business Privatization

#18: Media and Government Ignore Dwindling Oil Supplies

#19: Global Food Cartel Fast Becoming the World's Supermarket

#20: Extreme Weather Prompts New Warning from UN

#21: Forcing a World Market for GMOs

#22: Censoring Iraq

#23: Brazil Holds Back in FTAA Talks, But Provides Little Comfort for the Poor of South America

#24: Reinstating the Draft

#25: Wal-Mart Brings Inequality and Low Prices to the World

Word of the Day: Apprehension

apprehension \ap-rih-HEN-shun\ noun

1 a : the act or power of perceiving or comprehending b : the result of apprehending mentally : conception
2 : seizure by legal process : arrest
3 : suspicion or fear especially of future evil : foreboding

Merriam-Webster Online

Farish A. Noor: Hatred for the Moderate

An editorial response to the recent hacker attacks and death threats on the website MuslimWakeUp!

Hatred for the Moderate
Farish A. Noor
Daily Times

Let us, the growing and increasingly visible fraternity of moderate Muslims, lay our cards on the table and be honest with ourselves. While we must — as it is our ethical duty — condemn the rising tide of militarism worldwide, the brutal abuse of human rights, the economic exploitation of the poor, the growing power differentials between the developed and developing worlds; we must not spare ourselves and our community the criticism.

I write this as person who has studied the political Islam for nearly a decade. In the course of my travels and research I have come across some of the most astounding, redemptive and uplifting examples of religio-politics that underscores my faith in political Islam as a counter-hegemonic and anti-systemic discourse that can safeguard humanity against the predatory forces of economic globalisation. I am proud of being an Islamist-democrat myself and have worked with Islamist activists in Malaysia and Indonesia who have been, and remain at the forefront of the struggle for human rights, democracy and justice for all human beings.

But in the course of this long sojourn in the ever-shifting terrain of Islamic/Islamist political praxis, I have also come across a wide spectrum of losers, cop-outs, desperados and hapless ne’er-do-wells, ranging from closet homophobes, latent racists, self-denying bigots and downright fascists masquerading behind a presumed religiosity that in my opinion they are not entitled to.

To get off the ground progressive Islam needs to prioritise and enunciate its concerns in the most inclusive, tolerant and universal manner. It must seek meaningful strategic alliances with all groups and communities that are likewise fighting for social justice and the uplift of humanity. In the course of my own struggle as an academic and activist, I have found allies among fellow Islamists as well as secular democrats.

I have never found, on the other hand, any of the hothead Muslim bigots to be genuine defenders and promoters of democracy, human rights or human dignity. I find it hard, if not impossible, to take seriously those so-called ‘Islamic groups’ that claim to defend the rights of Palestinians when their own websites are festooned with articles and postings taken from neo-Nazi and Fascists websites, dripping with bile and venom. Xenophobes are not our allies and they never will be. We can never defend them. Nor should we try.


Entire Editorial

Eric J. Hobsbawm: Spreading Democracy

Spreading Democracy: The World's Most Dangerous Idea
Eric J. Hobsbawm
Foreign Policy

We are at present engaged in what purports to be a planned reordering of the world by the powerful states. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are but one part of a supposedly universal effort to create world order by “spreading democracy.” This idea is not merely quixotic—it is dangerous. The rhetoric surrounding this crusade implies that the system is applicable in a standardized (Western) form, that it can succeed everywhere, that it can remedy today’s transnational dilemmas, and that it can bring peace, rather than sow disorder. It cannot.


Entire Article

Norimitsu Onishi and William Blake

(The first poem I memorized)

Onishi, Norimitsu. “Does a Tiger Lurk in the Middle of a Fearful Symmetry?” The New York Times (September 5, 2004)

The Tiger
by William Blake, 1757–1827

TIGER, tiger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand dare seize the fire?

And what shoulder and what art
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand and what dread feet?

What the hammer? what the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? What dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?

When the stars threw down their spears,
And water'd heaven with their tears,
Did He smile His work to see?
Did He who made the lamb make thee?

Tiger, tiger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?

Saturday, January 01, 2005

When Buying Books Buy From Independents First, But If You Have To Shop Corporate, Buy Blue

Here's some interesting information that may affect where you choose to make your book purchases. 98% of Barnes & Noble's corporate political donations went to the Democrats, while 61% of Amazon's went to the Republicans? Borders gave 100% or its donations to Democrats. Those are some of the revelations to be found at Buy Blue.

---------------------------------------------------------------

OK, since I posted this I received some good responses, so I brought them into the original post--Thanks!

Harry suggests a different perspective from Klintron's Brain on the buy blue program and whether it makes any sense at all--including different facts that should be considered.

Oso suggests that we check out the great northwest independent bookstore Powell's (and if you are ever in Portland, OR, you must stop in at their massive downtown store) and I would also list the incredible independent bookstore/gathering-place Tattered Cover in Denver, CO (both of these stores are also great online resources for used and new books).

For my fellow Kentuckians check out Carmichaels in Louisville and Lexington has what claims to be an independent bookseller, Joseph Beth's, but can you really consider a bookstore business that has stores in four cities (Lexington, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh and Cleveland) an independent bookseller? Powell's does have 6 stores but they are all in Portland, OR and Tattered Cover has three but they are all in Denver, CO?. What do you think? How do we define Independents (here is one reason why Tattered Cover will always be a favorite--beyond their amazing stores)? While I enjoy cruising through Joseph Beth's they remind me of St. Louis's once great independent Library Ltd. that was bought out by Border's (just weeks after the owners told all of us loyal workers that they were committed to remaining independent--of course, St Louis being the great small city it is, still has a thriving independent bookstore scene, including the excellent Left Bank Books). Last, but definitely not least, in Lexington, for a wide selection of mags/zines, head to the small, but vital, Lexinton independent Sqecial Media (and if you are that close to the campus we might as well arrange to meet for drinks).

I live in a place that doesn't have a lot of reading materials that I need (Lexington is generally yuppie, traditional, and conservative) so I do a lot of reading-material shopping online, but nothing beats a real, independent bookstore that one can browse and find hidden treasures.

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions
Democracy Now

We spend the hour with John Perkins, a former respected member of the international banking community. In his book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man he describes how as a highly paid professional, he helped the U.S. cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then taking over their economies.


Audio/Transcript

(courtesy of Goose who posted about this at the Progressive Bloggers Alliance)

Earlier posting on this

Matt Ruff: Sewer, Gas & Works

A voice of (un)reason from Capitalism magazine that is against charity (per its Ayn Rand radical individualist perspective signified by her quote on the masthead), yet asks for donations at the bottom of the page:

U.S. Government Should Not Help Tsunami Victims

As a taxpayer I'm very happy that my country would help countries/peoples in need, its the money spent on bombs blowing the shit out of other lands that bothers me (makes me angry--hurts me). To make matters worse this militaristic agenda is becoming something of a religion that seeks to burn-at-the-stake anyone who dares to criticize it.

I just finished Matt Ruff's very intelligent, engaging, wild, futuristic novel called Sewer, Gas & Works: The Public Works Trilogy that includes a technological reincarnation of Ayn Rand (along with eco-pirates, a mutated shark called Meisterbrau, a genius-capitalist, activists publishers, disabled vets, the genocidal G.A.S. and homicidal robots). It was the perfect holiday antidote to the current ideology of solipsistic individualism that is gripping our nation (to be clear I do not oppose pleasure, individualism, or self-interest--these are good and necessary--what I do oppose is monadic solipsism that denies the interest of others through glorified worship of the self/group).

Bitch. Ph.D.

A fellow blogger helped me out and I would like to recommend her site.

First get a taste of a classic post:

Do I Bitch About Students Too Much

and then catch up on her current posts:

Bitch. Ph.D

Kirsten Anderbergh: Too Angry For What

(courtesy of Dr. Menlo who posted about it at American Samizdat)

A great essay that points out how the accusation of being "too angry" is used against those with a critical perspective:

Too Angry For What

Kirsten Anderberg's Homepage

Friday, December 31, 2004

Westboro Baptist Group Thanks God For the Tsunami

They must be friends of Ann Coulter...

Raw Story reports that the Westboro Baptist group that picketed Matthew Shepard's funeral has posted on their website thanking God for the Tsunami and the deaths of over 2,000 Swedes:

Westboro Baptist Tsunami Statement

(courtesy of Ddjango who posted this at the Progressive Blog Alliance HQ)



Greg's Digital Retouching Portfolio

This is an online portfolio of a digital artist’s work digitally retouching photographic images. Shows the before and after images—unique perspective in that by moving the cursor over the images it shows original untouched look. Great for body image, production of knowledge/truth, representation/art, issues/projects.)

Greg’s Digital Retouching Portfolio

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Receives $40,000+ in Gifts: No Conflict?

Now I teach at a university--what would people think if students, not necessarily ones who are "currently" taking my class (but perhaps the fraternity brother of some students who are "currently" taking my courses), gave me $40,000+ in gifts.

Justice Thomas Reports Wealth of Gifts

Sister Helen Prejean: Death in Texas

Death in Texas
Sister Helen Prejean
New York Review of Books

An excerpt:

In the twenty-first century, a state governor represents the last vestige of the "divine right of kings," because he has absolute power over life and death— especially when such power is entrusted to politicians motivated more by expediency than by conscience. Faced with a pending execution, no governor wants to appear callous about human life. So governors appoint pardons boards and meet with legal counselors, who take the political heat for controversial cases. All governors claim to agonize over death penalty decisions. All claim to scrutinize every possible angle of the cases of condemned persons facing execution under their watch.

George W. Bush during his six years as governor of Texas presided over 152 executions, more than any other governor in the recent history of the United States. Bush has said: "I take every death penalty case seriously and review each case carefully.... Each case is major because each case is life or death." In his autobiography, A Charge to Keep (1999), he wrote, "For every death penalty case, [legal counsel] brief[s] me thoroughly, reviews the arguments made by the prosecution and the defense, raises any doubts or problems or questions." Bush called this a "fail-safe" method for ensuring "due process" and certainty of guilt.

He might have succeeded in bequeathing to history this image of himself as a scrupulously fair-minded governor if the journalist Alan Berlow had not used the Public Information Act to gain access to fifty-seven confidential death penalty memos that Bush's legal counsel, Alberto R. Gonzales, whom President Bush has recently nominated to be attorney general of the United States, presented to him, usually on the very day of execution.[1] The reports Gonzales presented could not be more cursory. Take, for example, the case of Terry Washington, a mentally retarded man of thirty-three with the communication skills of a seven-year-old. Washington's plea for clemency came before Governor Bush on the morning of May 6, 1997. After a thirty-minute briefing by Gonzales, Bush checked "Deny"— just as he had denied twenty-nine other pleas for clemency in his first twenty-eight months as governor.

But Washington's plea for clemency raised substantial issues, which called for thoughtful, fair-minded consideration, not the least of which was the fact that Washington's mental handicap had never been presented to the jury that condemned him to death. Gonzales's legal summary, however, omitted any mention of Washington's mental limitations as well as the fact that his trial lawyer had failed to enlist the help of a mental health expert to testify on his client's behalf. When Washington's postconviction lawyers took on his defense, they researched deeply into his childhood and came up with horrifying evidence of abuse. Terry Washington, along with his ten siblings, had been beaten regularly with whips, water hoses, extension cords, wire hangers, and fan belts. This was mitigation of the strongest kind, but Washington's jury never heard it. Nor is there any evidence that Gonzales told Bush about it.

Bush wrote in his autobiography that it was not his job to "replace the verdict of a jury unless there are new facts or evidence of which a jury was unaware, or evidence that the trial was somehow unfair"[2] (italics added). But new information about a mentally retarded man's battered, abused childhood that his jury never got to hear—wouldn't that qualify?

When Berlow asked Gonzales directly whether Bush ever read the clemency petitions, he replied that he did so "from time to time." Instead, Bush seems to have relied on Gonzales's summaries, and they clearly indicate that Gonzales continuously sided with the prosecutors. One third of his summary of Terry Washington's case is devoted to a detailed description of the gruesome aspects of the crime, while he fails to mention Washington's mental limitations and his miserably ineffective defense lawyer. In response to Berlow's direct question, Gonzales admitted that his conferences with Bush on these cases typically lasted no more than thirty minutes. Berlow confirmed this for himself when he looked at Bush's appointment calendar for the morning of Washington's execution and saw a half-hour slot marked "Al G—Execution."

...

visited Karla Faye Tucker and the other women on Texas's death row in October 1997, four months before her execution. I had been invited by Pam Perillo, Karla Faye's friend, who was also on death row.[3] Pam told me in a letter how she had watched Karla Faye change. She said that when Karla Faye had first arrived at the Mountain View Unit, "she had the foulest mouth you can possibly imagine" and would "snarl" at anyone who tried to befriend her. "She was far from the Lord," Pamela said, "definitely not saved."

In his autobiography, Bush claimed that the pending execution of Karla Faye Tucker "felt like a huge piece of concrete...crushing me." But in an unguarded moment in 1999 while traveling during the presidential campaign, Bush revealed his true feelings to the journalist Tucker Carlson. Bush mentioned Karla Faye Tucker, who had been executed the previous year, and told Carlson that in the weeks immediately before the execution, Bianca Jagger and other protesters had come to Austin to plead for clemency for her. Carlson asked Bush if he had met with any of the petitioners and was surprised when Bush whipped around, stared at him, and snapped, "No, I didn't meet with any of them." Carlson, who until that moment had admired Bush, said that Bush's curt response made him feel as if he had just asked "the dumbest, most offensive question ever posed." Bush went on to tell him that he had also refused to meet Larry King when he came to Texas to interview Tucker but had watched the interview on television. King, Bush said, asked Tucker difficult questions, such as "What would you say to Governor Bush?"

What did Tucker answer? Carlson asked.

"Please," Bush whimpered, his lips pursed in mock desperation, "please, don't kill me."

Carlson was shocked.[4] He couldn't believe Bush's callousness and reasoned that his cruel mimicry of the woman whose death he had authorized must have been sparked by anger over Karla Faye Tucker's remarks during the King interviews. When King had asked her what she planned to ask Governor Bush, Karla Faye had said she thought that if Bush approved her execution, he would be succumbing to election-year pressure from pro–death penalty voters.

Election-year pressure?

Bush was receiving thousands of messages urging clemency for Tucker, including one from one of his daughters. "Born-again" evangelists such as Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, normally ardent advocates of execution, urged him to commute Tucker's sentence. When Pope John Paul II urged Bush to grant mercy to Tucker, Bush responded disingenuously in a letter to the Pope, saying, "Ms. Tucker's sentence can only be commuted by the Governor if the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles recommends a commutation of sentence." On several occasions, Bush stated publicly that in deciding Karla Faye Tucker's fate, he was seeking "guidance through prayer," adding that "judgments about the heart and soul of an individual on death row are best left to a higher authority."

But there was no way Bush could avoid the godlike power thrust on him as governor. When Russian president Vladimir Putin declared that life-or-death judgments should be "left to the Almighty," he meant that such supposed judgments, even if they are believed to be divine, cannot properly be discerned and administered by flawed human agents. This recognition led him to oppose government executions. But while Bush claimed to leave the judgment of Karla Faye Tucker to God, in reality he exercised his own political judgment and authorized her death.

...

As governor, Bush certainly did not stand apart in his routine refusal to deny clemency to death row petitioners, but what does set him apart is the sheer number of executions over which he has presided. Callous indifference to human suffering may also set Bush apart. He may be the only government official to mock a condemned person's plea for mercy, then lie about it afterward, claiming humane feelings he never felt. On the contrary, it seems that Bush is comfortable with using violent solutions to solve troublesome social and political realities.


The Entire Essay

Eliza Strickland: Does Commercialization Cause Discrimination at Museums

A review of the Guerilla Girls new book The Guerrilla Girls' Art Museum Activity Book.

Selective Thinking: Does Commercialization Cause Discrimination at Museums?
by Eliza Strickland
The New Republic

On a recent wet and blustery evening in Manhattan, the usual art-world types crowded into a narrow art bookstore. A flamboyantly garbed woman clutched a Chihuahua wearing a tiny gold lamé jacket, and earnest students in heavy black-rimmed glasses hovered over glossy monographs. Despite the scrum, it wasn't hard to spot the guests of honor: They were the two women dressed in black from the neck down, and covered in fur from the neck up. The Guerrilla Girls, everyone's favorite feminist art activists, had donned their trademark gorilla masks once again for the release party celebrating their latest publication, a little piece of whimsy called The Guerrilla Girls' Art Museum Activity Book. The impetus for the book, say the Guerrilla Girls, is that as museums become more corporate discrimination takes on a subtler form.

The Guerrilla Girls gained fame in the late 1980s for raising awareness of the under-representation of women and artists of color in museums. They irritated institutions and prominent art-world figures while protected by the anonymity of their gorilla masks. The posters they plastered on buildings around Manhattan in the dead of night caught the eyes of pedestrians the next morning, generating a mix of humor and righteous indignation. Their most famous poster demanded: "Do women have to be naked to get into the Met. Museum?" and announced troubling statistics from the Metropolitan's modern art galleries, such as the fact that less than 5 percent of the artists were women. The Guerrilla Girls have kept up their crusade for more diversity in museums, but their new book focuses on a different but related problem: the commercialization of the art world.


The Entire Review Essay

Thursday, December 30, 2004

Ann Coulter's Christmas Message for the "People of Islam"

Sinking to a new low, the far, far right pundit Ann Coulter puts this at the head of her weblog:

To The People Of Islam:
Just think: If we'd invaded your countries, killed your leaders and converted you to Christianity YOU'D ALL BE OPENING CHRISTMAS PRESENTS RIGHT ABOUT NOW!
Merry Christmas

(courtesy of Goose at Comments From Left Field and Liz at Honsberger is a Liar)

South East Asia Earthquake and Tsunami Site

To find out information, to volunteer, donate or find people:

The South-East Asia Earthquake and Tsunami Site

Despotism!: The Documentary

(courtesy of Rigorous Institution and thanks to The River for referring me to RI)

Check out this 1940s Encyclopedia Britannica documentary film on "Despotism" ... the big question is--would this be shown in our schools today? In the Post 9/11 Culture of quietism and patriotic intimidation this documentary gains new relevance for our contemporary society.

Watch Despotism: Click on Stream Buttons to the Left of the Page (or save it)

Being Osama

Being Osama

Produced by Ari A. Cohen and Evan Beloff
Directed by Mahmoud Kaabour and Timothy Schwab
42 min., 2004

BEING OSAMA is a one-hour television documentary which opens a window onto the lives of six Montréalers named Osama. Through an exploration of the interior and emotional lives of these subjects, the film connects the experiences of these individual Arab-Canadians to those of their own larger cultural community and to Canadian society as a whole, seen against the backdrop of continuing conflict and suspicion between the West and the Arab/Islamic world. By turns lyrical, observational, impressionistic, and factual, BEING OSAMA is an intimate exploration of six people highly diverse in their backgrounds, interests, and personalities, united by their first name and by their experience as Arabs living in Canada in the post-9/11 world.

Being Osama was chosen "Best Doc" at the Juried Screenings of the University Film/Video Association conference 2004.

CFP: Theories/Practices of Blogging

This is a call for papers for a special theme issue on “blogging” to be published as a threshold issue in the journal Reconstruction. The editors of this theme issue are looking for papers/projects/manifestos on the subject of “blogging.”

Possible topics:
Theorization of the Blogosphere
Blogging Manifesto
Politics and/of Blogging
Aesthetics of Blogs
Activist Blogging
Auto/Biographical Blogs
New Media/Communication Theories and Blogging
New Journalism Blogging
Civil Rights of Bloggers
Global Culture and Blogging
Local Culture and Blogging
Education and Blogging
Gender and Blogging
Race and Blogging
Collective Blogs
Community of Bloggers
Unrealized Potential of Blogging
Critiques of Blogging
Representations of Space/Place on Blogs
Purpose of a Unique Individual/Collective Blog
Audio and Visual Blogs

We are especially interested in the experiences, theories and perspectives of those who actually blog. Feel free to propose other topics to the editors:
Michael Benton (University of Kentucky) and Nick Lewis (co-founder of the Progressive Bloggers’ Alliance and NetPolitik)
Send all queries, proposals and manuscripts to mdbento@gmail.com

Read below about the journal Reconstruction and threshold special theme issues and their deadlines. The editors expect this issue to fill very quickly due to the importance of this subject.
Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture (ISSN 1547-4348) is an innovative culture studies journal dedicated to fostering an intellectual community composed of scholars and their audience, granting them all the opportunity and ability to share thoughts and opinions on the most important and influential work in contemporary interdisciplinary studies.

Manuscripts may be written from any number of perspectives, and with any end in mind; possible sites for articulations may focus on the urban, the rural, the natural, the social, local and global “culture,” politics, (auto)biography, medicine, the body, science, texts (music, cinema, literature), media (the internet, television), myth and religion.

Submissions are encouraged from a variety of perspectives, including, but not limited to: geography, cultural studies, folklore, architecture, history, sociology, psychology, communications, anthropology, music, political science, semiotics, theology, art history, queer theory, literary criticism, ecocriticism, criminology, urban planning, gender studies, etc. All theoretical and empirical approaches are welcomed.

This special issue is a threshold issue. Thresholds are about the transgressing, pushing or collapsing of boundaries; they are about the point of beginning, the entranceway and stimulation. Thus, threshold issues are dedicated to exploring an experimental theme, novel method(s) or theoretical apparatus(es) that might not normally find an audience. Rather than having firm publication dates – due to the experimental nature of their contents – threshold issues are published once a minimum number of acceptable submissions are received. If this minimum is not met by 18 months from the December 13, 2005, the approved manuscripts will be published in the next available issue of the journal.

Information on the preparation of manuscripts for submission can be found Here.

Reconstruction is published quarterly (January, April, July, and October) and is currently indexed in the MLA International Bibliography.

Evil Environmentalists Threaten World!

Grist report

Popular author Michael Crichton's new novel "State of Fear" features an evil cadre of environmentalists that uses secret technology to cause catastrophic natural disasters in order to convince the public of the dangers of global warming. They are aided by gullible Hollywood types and the liberal media. A particularly nefarious group of greens sends agents driving Priuses to dispatch enemies with bites from blue-ringed octopuses. But it's not a joke. Not even a satire. It's a serious thriller, and in the bizarro world that is climate-change debate in the U.S., it's being taken seriously. Scientists whose work is cited in the book claim it cherry-picks facts and distorts conclusions; reviewers say it is didactic and
plodding. It is, however, No. 2 on Amazon.com's bestseller list. We give up.


Michiko Kakutani's review:

BOOKS OF THE TIMES; Beware! Tree-Huggers Plot Evil to Save World

Joanne Mariner: Outsourcing Detention

Outsourcing Detention
Joanne Mariner
Alternet

Why is an American citizen being held without charges in Saudi Arabia? And why does the U.S. State Department seem to have a vested interest in keeping him there?


Outsourcing Detention

Village Voice: 6th Annual Film Poll

My favorite movie of the year was I ♥ Huckabees and the favorite DVD I rented was Cuckoo.

Here's what the critics polled by the Village Voice picked as their favorites:

Take 6 Film Critics Poll

Wednesday, December 29, 2004

Something to Think About as Tax Season Approaches

The Trickle-Down Shakedown

Jim Hightower: Billionaire Welfare

Something to think about as the hype for the NFL playoffs starts. The real problem with professional sports is that it is becoming a new form of Billionaire Welfare.

Another great case analysis of this trend of billionaires welfare is in Mike Davis' "The Next Little Dollar" The Private Governments of San Diego" in Under the Perfect Sun: The San Diego Tourists Never See (see pages 127-144)

Remembering Susan Sontag

I just found out that the public intellectual and social critic Susan Sontag has died at the age of 71.

Susan Sontag, Social Critic With Verve, Dies at 71

excerpt:

"The theme that runs through Susan's writing is this lifelong struggle to arrive at the proper balance between the moral and the aesthetic," Leon Wieseltier, literary editor of The New Republic and an old friend of Ms. Sontag's, said in a telephone interview yesterday. "There was something unusually vivid about her writing. That's why even if one disagrees with it - as I did frequently - it was unusually stimulating. She showed you things you hadn't seen before; she had a way of reopening questions."

Through four decades, public response to Ms. Sontag remained irreconcilably divided. She was described, variously, as explosive, anticlimactic, original, derivative, naïve, sophisticated, approachable, aloof, condescending, populist, puritanical, sybaritic, sincere, posturing, ascetic, voluptuary, right-wing, left-wing, profound, superficial, ardent, bloodless, dogmatic, ambivalent, lucid, inscrutable, visceral, reasoned, chilly, effusive, relevant, passé, ambivalent, tenacious, ecstatic, melancholic, humorous, humorless, deadpan, rhapsodic, cantankerous and clever. No one ever called her dull.

Ms. Sontag's best-known books, all published by Farrar, Straus & Giroux, include the novels "Death Kit" (1967), "The Volcano Lover" (1992) and "In America" (2000); the essay collections "Against Interpretation" (1966), "Styles of Radical Will" (1969) and "Under the Sign of Saturn" (1980); the critical studies "On Photography" (1977) and "AIDS and Its Metaphors" (1989); and the short-story collection "I, Etcetera" (1978). One of her most famous works, however, was not a book, but an essay, "Notes on Camp," published in 1964 and still widely read.


More on Susan Sontag:

A Rigorous Intellectual Dressed in Glamour

Thinking Woman: Susan Sontag Was An Irresistible Force Among Intellectuals

Books and Writers: Biographical Sketch

On Photography

Regarding the Torture of Others

PBS: Video and Conversation With Sontag

Reviews/Essays Published in the New York Review of Books

The WTC Attacks

1992 Don Swaim Interview with Sontag

BBC Audio Interviews

BOOK TV: In Depth 3 Hour Interview

Interview with Bill Moyers

The Novelist and Moral Reasoning

Literature is Freedom

Of Courage and Resistance

Fascinating Fascism

So Whose Words Were They

Notes on Camp

Sontag Discussing and Reading From Her Books Regarding the Pain of Others and In America

Christopher Hichen: Remembering an Intellectual Heroine

Barbara Fraser and Paul Jeffrey: Latin America Today

Barbara Fraser and Paul Jeffrey, working for the independent news service National Catholic Reporter, have produced a ten part report on Latin America Today.

May 14 Part 1 Introduction: Power or credibility?
June 4 Part 2 Economics: Little relief in sight for poverty, debt and unemployment July 16 Part 3 Development: Lasting change by helping the poor without paternalism
Aug. 13 Part 4 Immigration: Opportunity and challenge for Latin America's poor
Sept. 10 Part 5a Truth: an essential ingredient for reconciliation; Part 5b Reconciliation from the grass roots up
Sept. 24 Part 6a Indigenous people: Fighting for rights after centuries of discrimination; Part 6b Health worker brings education back to his people; Part 6c Vanishing forests threaten indigenous groups
Oct. 8 Part 7 Women In Latin America: The gender gap kills
Oct. 29 Part 8 Children: Poverty cuts children’s chances for a future; interview with the Bishop of the Gangs
Nov. 12 Part 9a Church: Base communities, once hope of church, now in disarray; Part 9b Less threatening lay movements favored by church leaders; Part 9c Priests in region grow more conservative
Nov.26 Part 10a Looking ahead: Church groups seek new models of solidarity; Part 10b
The Bishop of the Gangs: An interview with Rómulo Emiliani; Part 10c 'We can't just remain passive,' says Honduran cardinal

Sunday, December 19, 2004

Tuning in With Saul Williams

Q&A: Tuning in with Saul Williams
Rachel Cernansky, Satya Magazine

Saul Williams is a poet and spoken word artist who is not new to the performing arts scene, but has garnered a wider audience since becoming involved with the Not In Our Name project. He helped write their Statement of Conscience/Pledge of Resistance against the war in Iraq, and wrote songs for the project's soon-to-be-released CD (which are also available for download at NotInOurNameMusic.com). Saul co-wrote and starred in the film Slam after winning the Nuyorican Poet's Café's Grand Slam Championship in 1996. His latest book is a collection of poems entitled "She" (MTV Books, 1999), and he is currently starring in the play Tibi's Law.

Saul Williams recently shared some of his thoughts with Rachel Cernansky on art, artistry, and, inevitably, current events.

How do you describe yourself as an artist?

I describe myself as a student and I consider myself an artist. I think that an artist is a vessel and that it's our duty to cleanse and make ourselves as open as possible so that things can enter us and we can filter them out. People relate to [art] and find themselves in it. I often encounter people who say, "Thank you for putting in words something I've been trying to say or have wanted to hear expressed." People relate to the sounds that they've been yearning to relate to, and the people who are able to articulate them through whatever artistic instrument they use -- that's their duty.

How did you get started?

I started out wanting to be an actor. As an eight year-old kid, I enjoyed not only the attention, but the release it allowed me. As I studied acting more over time, I got into the idea of being able to embody a character. Then, studying philosophy and acting, I started realizing that the greatest thing we can do on this planet is come to know ourselves. You can't portray a character without raising the questions that the character raises for yourself. And so I started seeing acting as somewhat of a martial art, where you have to find your center and move from there. Acting allows you to tune in and tune out simultaneously -- you lose yourself and find yourself.

Through practicing that, I eventually started writing my own stuff, and I started writing poetry. I also wanted to be a rapper when I was young, maybe ten or 11, and I started writing rhymes. So it all unfolded over time and turned into what I'm doing now -- which is reciting poetry, writing poetry, but more so, living poetry.

Living poetry -- how so?

I don't believe that poetry is just life on the page. I think that we have to find a way to connect our words with our actions and our actions with our will. When I say living poetry, I mean we have to be courageous in our endeavors. We have to be willing to go places. And sometimes we have to be willing to follow, and I'm not speaking of other people. There've been times when I've written things that have been beyond my own belief system and it's like, Okay, I've been led to this. It is a sort of mathematics -- you're led to a new answer. And it forces me to reevaluate my entire life.

I'm highly inspired by aesthetics -- beauty. I aim to create beauty, because I think that it is perhaps our greatest teacher. A beautiful song or poem -- which may have its harshness, its cruelty -- allows people to pull from it, and grow from it.

Do you feel that politics is inextricably linked with being an artist?

I think that being alive is linked to politics, there is no separation. That's the greatest illusion of humankind, we think that things are separate from each other, that chemistry is separate from biology, and politics is separate from spirituality or what have you. It's all connected. Even for someone to say "I'm not political" -- that's a political statement.

In the realm of artistry, especially in America, where we're dealing with artists (like myself) that encounter the media (like yourself), the question of responsibility comes into play because it is a question of power. The fact that I open my mouth and people listen puts me in a powerful position. Thus I need to think about what I say, because I know that people are affected by it.

When we deal with the current scheme of politics -- war and people like Bush and the current regime and all of these things -- it's extremely important for artists and people themselves to speak up and connect their beliefs to their actions and to their artistry. Especially when the media is on the side of and owned by the corporations. The government, the regime itself, is controlled by corporations. So we have a greater responsibility in this day and age because the government is not doing its responsibility. It no longer truly represents the people, it represents corporate rule, and the demands of supply and demand.

So we, artists, now become the true representatives of the people. People flock to us in connection to our beliefs -- if they believe what we say, they listen to us. Or sometimes it's not that, sometimes they like the beat, or the energy, or think we're cute, or whatever. But either way, we are in positions of power that are no less authoritative than a president or a secretary of defense or what have you. The people are in control, whether the government recognizes that or not -- it's only a matter of the people recognizing that and taking the control which is rightfully theirs. So it is up to the artist, or whomever has the microphone, to remind the people of that power -- to remind the people of their power.

Indeed. It's just that people often tend to underestimate their power and impact as individuals.

Yeah. I think that is because we've been programmed to do so. Radio, TV, media, it's all brain programming. And unfortunately in America our minds have been programmed perhaps worse than the rest of the world; we think we're free because we're told that we are, that America represents freedom. But we have not fully claimed our freedom, because we have not freed ourselves from the stuff that tells us we're free. The greatest Americans -- the most renowned ones that have represented America in the truest way throughout history, the Henry David Thoreaus, the Walt Whitmans, the Martin Luther Kings and even Abraham Lincolns -- have been people that have roamed the wilderness, tuned into their spirits, tuned into nature, and pulled their messages from that. And that's where they've understood freedom and the responsibility and power that comes with freedom.

Right now it's like we are unable to imagine world peace. Why? Because our imaginations have been stolen from us. We can imagine World War III because we've seen it in every movie, every TV show, etc. We cannot imagine world peace because we've never seen it before. We have to start seeing and imagining for ourselves. As prisons and schools are becoming privatized, it's our responsibility as individuals to privatize our imaginations, and once again start imagining and envisioning things for ourselves. People think being American means "I'm free, free to watch as many shows as I want, to play Playstation, to do all the stuff I want to do as much as I want." But that freedom requires responsibility. And your responsibility is to educate and become in tune with yourself -- your highest self. We're talking about something beyond religion and reporting to any synagogue or church or mosque. We're talking about reporting to yourself and to your connection to the universe. Because we are connected and we do affect people. We have to be aware of this and then act consciously.

What advice do you have for people to do that?

Well there are several practical ways. The first is to throw yourself out of your comfort zone; and that can mean many things. It can mean instead of picking up a newspaper, pick up a blank book, and write. What is the news of today? You write it. Turn off CNN. Turn off the TV. Turn off all these external forms of ingestion. Sit in silence, for an hour. Try to still your mind -- not think about anything, anything. We're afraid of silence; but there's nothing more powerful than silence.

That is not always the answer, but in the face of so much propaganda and so much bullshit, that seems to be the answer for us today. Once people realize their individual power -- to love and to love each other -- then humanity is changed for evermore. The greatest resistance to war is love, and love is not resistance. Love is love. It's crazy, we resist love. We're afraid of it, afraid of getting hurt, of being open, afraid of being vulnerable.

How do you explain what's going on to your seven year-old daughter?

I've taken her to several rallies, and she understands what's going on in Iraq to the extent that most of us in America do, which is that there's a war going on and people are dying. She believes it's all about oil. But she doesn't see it. She's at school right now having fun and she doesn't feel impacted by it, except when she sees me angry, responding to what I've heard.

Kids I think across the board are not for war; kids do not want to live in a violent world, you know? So in many ways they're disappointed in their parents or in the adult world that we would allow things to get to this point.

Can you explain your involvement with Not In Our Name?

I helped to write their Pledge of Resistance, and I've written some music for them. I have been speaking non-stop and working with them in saying, We don't condone the atrocities that are occurring by the American government in our name. Since we are tax-paying citizens, anything the American government does, they are basically doing in our names; and if we are not in agreement, then we have a right to stand up.

We don't want people killed in our names, and unfortunately that is exactly what is happening. Here I am, 100 percent against the war -- I'm not one of those people who is saying, Let's just get Saddam out without any warfare -- I'm not thinking about Saddam, to me Bush is a bigger threat, a bigger terrorist. Whatever Saddam has done, he's done to his people; Bush is aiming to impose terror on the world, on humanity itself. Countless Iraqis are dying at this very moment, as we speak, and I'm sitting at home, chilling. And not only civilians, but soldiers, I don't want the soldiers dead. If you really want to support our troops, don't send them to war, don't ask them to fight.

What are your thoughts on the current state of hip hop?

I think people are definitely growing tired of the bullshit -- whether conscious of it or not. Hip hop is reflective of America. And artists are slowly being forced to realize that they have to speak on what matters, because whatever they speak on becomes matter. Slowly but surely, people are turning their ears to the "alternative" hip hop groups. Even the commercial hip hop groups are starting to have alternative alignments -- Jay Z or Eminem with the Roots backing them up. So I'm optimistic that things are shifting for the better, it'll only be a matter of time before hip hop once again is able to feed the people that listen to it as opposed to poison them, which it's been doing for the past, I don't know, decade.

What work are you most proud of?

I don't know, I don't really associate pride with the work [that I do]. I guess I'm most moved by the book that I just finished, which is called, "Said the Shotgun to the Head." It comes out in the fall through MTV Books. It's a love poem -- about 200 pages -- to all of the things that are decaying and destroying the values and ideals of the West as we know it. I think it's the most beautiful/conceptual/political thing that I've ever written. I've worked on it for four years and I can't wait for people to have the opportunity to read it.

Who are your role models?

People like Mohammed, Jesus -- those are the biggest role models. Then there are people like Paul Robeson and Harriet Tubman. Harriet Tubman has a beautiful quote: "I would have been able to free a thousand more slaves if I could only have convinced them that they were slaves." Which is crazy, to think there were people that did not even know they were enslaved -- during the times of slavery. They just thought, "That's life, this is how life is."

Then there are people like Alice Walker, Jimi Hendrix, Thom Yorke [of Radiohead] -- all types of people, wonderful people -- my daughter, my son. My mom.

Rachel Cernansky is Assistant Editor of Satya Magazine and is finishing up her undergraduate degree in Politics and Nutrition at New York University.

Interview Link

12 Reasons Why Privatizing Social Security is a Bad Idea

Twelve Reasons Why Privatizing Social Security is a Bad Idea
Greg Anrig Jr., Bernard Wasow, The Century Foundation

As the White House gets ready to push forward with drastic reforms to the Social Security system, The Century Foundation looks at 12 big reasons why privatization is a bad deal.

The Reasons

My Business Writing Course

I've been assigned to teacha business writing course and I'm thinking about it...

Since the 203 course begins and ends with units on ethics I'm thinking of screening a movie each of the 4 units centered around ethical issues in business (to develop a groundswell toward that last section)

We will read Ruth Ozeki's My Year of Meats novel (the last unit has to be centered around a novel that the whole class will read) which covers businnes ethics, globalization processes, media influence, agricultural/environmental issues, food politics and gender issues.

So possible moveis I was thinking about:

Bamboozled: Representational politics
Office Space: humorous looks at office politics
Corporation: (a new documentary--I'm hunting for it)
Matewan: (labor/class/gender/place)
Fight Club: business ethics and terror politics (alienation, fragmentation and
rage)... especially as it is played out in the homosocial world of "tough guise"
(Jackson Katz) posturing and need for control/dominance--especially how
resistance can begin to reproduce the dominant's "terror" (I define terror as
the need to control at any cost) techniques and spiral into the same destructive
patterns

Just random ideas--any movies cross your mind as possibilities?

I was thinking of starting off the semester telling my students I am a conservative ... when they finally start questioning it I would etymologically
deconstruct the word "radical" (rad=roots; radical looks back to an earlier time
to restore an original political context, in this case an earlier conception of
democracy--this, of course, is a conservative move) and discuss how being
progressive is conservative in the sense that we seek to build a better world
for our families, our people, and our communities (we, of course, include the rights
of everyone), and introudce them to Wendell Berry, and explain how George Bush
fits into the neo-liberal model (complete with critiques from leading
conservatives) and is essentially a destructive liberal...

Just a fantasy--ha!

Michael Hardt: On the Politics of Love

The Collaborator and the Multitude: An Interview with Michael Hardt
Michael Hardt with Caleb Smith and Enrico Minardi
The Minnesota Review

Excerpts:

A major event in political and critical theory, Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's Empire (Harvard, 2000) turned orthodox thinking about imperialism around, proposing a decentered global network and redescribing capital, in the poststructuralist terms of Deleuze and Guattari, as a dynamic pattern of breaks and flows. The book is one fruit of the continuing collaboration of Hardt, a literature professor at Duke, and Negri, an Italian radical theorist; previously they co-authored Labor of Dionysus: A Critique of the State Form (Minnesota, 1994) and most recently they have written Multitude (Penguin, 2004), which develops a concept of cooperative resistance to the reimagined global order as an alternative to the idea of national liberation.

Before joining the faculty at Duke, Michael Hardt did his graduate work at the University of Washington. He is also the author of Gilles Deleuze: An Apprenticeship in Philosophy (Minnesota, 1993) and numerous pieces of political journalism and criticism. In addition, he has translated Negri’s The Savage Anomaly (Minnesota, 1991) and coedited Radical Thought in Italy (with Paolo Virno; Minnesota, 1996) and The Jameson Reader (with Kathi Weeks; Blackwell, 2000). Relevant to this interview, see also Michael Hardt's essay "Prison Time" in the Yale Review 91 (1997): 64-79. This interview took place on 5 March 2004 in Hardt’s office at Duke. It was conducted by Caleb Smith, a doctoral student in English at Duke, and Enrico Minardi, a lecturer in Romance Studies.

...

Smith: ... I want to ask you one last question, about love and joy. The "Prison Time" essay ends with a line about love, and you've written about the multitude "directing technologies and production toward its own joy." You seem to be reclaiming these terms for political conversation. I won't ask you to define them, but what's involved in restoring joy and love to a field which ordinarily concerns itself with quantifiable values and material production and cash interests?

Hardt: And how can you get anyone to take you seriously when you use those terms? This is definitely an interest of mine, and I think of Toni's, too. We've said to each other for a while, but without finding a way to do it, that we would like to make love a properly political concept. One has to expand the concept of love beyond the limits of the couple, even the psychoanalytic limits of coupling. One good model is through Christian and Judaic traditions, where love means, in a way, a constitution of the community. Premodern notions of love have this political character. As it has gained in sentimentality, love has lost its political efficacy. That’s one project. It seems to me a summation of various things that interest me to think of politics as a project of love.

I started becoming interested in politics as an undergraduate, but I was repulsed by the political atmosphere, which seemed to me mostly an atmosphere of moralism and abnegation—a search for purity, but a search that meant we should feel guilty for the privileges we have and try to avoid them. Or we should maintain a kind of purity by not watching violent movies, eating certain things and not others. In Central America, a lot of the activists coming from Europe and North America were driven by guilt and acting for the good of others. But I learned from the Central Americans that there was another kind of activism which was not about our guilt but about our joy. It was not about going and doing politics because I need to give up something in order to help others—I'm getting something out of it. One group thought, I'm here to help them. The other group thought, I'm here so that they can teach me how to live better.

Helping others is not even in tension with making my life better. All of that is part of the same thing. To make the world better, I don't need to give up things, I need to gain things. I need to gain a more joyful life. I remember a lot of stifling discussions, "Well, you can never get people in the U.S. to do anything because they're all so comfortable, and you'll never get them to give up things." I remember thinking, Man, those in the U.S. are all so miserable; if you could just show them the joy of what a different life could be. I remember thinking about politics, rather than as an ascetic redistribution, as a collective project for the increase of joy. The younger generation of activists today seems to have learned this. If one traces the transformations of activism in the U.S., ACT UP and Queer Nation were a real hinge, making demonstrations fun, making them funny, great slogans. The relationship between a demonstration and a party becomes quite confused.

Smith: Or even a carnival.

Hardt: Right. The whole talk now about movement as carnival is perfect for this. It may not be the only way of conducting politics, but it's the only politics I want. That might be an adequate definition of love: a politics of joy.

The Entire Interview

More on Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri:

Serena Anderlini D'Onofrio: On Hardt and Negri

After Empire

ACME: Special Issue on Empire; Ephemera: Special Issue on The Theory of the Multitude

Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri: Multitude--War and Democracy in the Age of Empire

Saturday, December 18, 2004

Questioning the Frame and the Battle for America

(courtesy of Dave Newton)

A powerful video message to those wish to continue the struggle (and for those who may have lost hope):

The Battle for America

James Carroll: God's Clock

(For Chris Hair, my thoughtful, religious colleague who engaged me in a fascinating discussion on the nature of religous belief.)

God's clock
By James Carroll
Boston Globe (via Boston.com)

ONCE A WEEK or so, I come downstairs in the morning to find that the three weights of the grandfather clock in the living room have fallen to the bottom of the oaken cabinet. To keep the clock going, they must be lifted on their chains. I dutifully open the glass-fronted door and grasp each brass cylinder, pulling down on the chain as I bring the weight up -- first one, then another, then the other. I close the door carefully, waiting for its fitted snap.

Once again, the weights will do their work to keep the pendulum swinging, the chimes sounding every 15 minutes and the gong striking on the hour. In this way, in concert with the force of gravity, I assure that time does not stop in our house.

I must occasionally remind myself that in fact, nothing important depends on this clock's ticking. When, through my neglect, the weights descend to the cabinet floor, the chains become twisted and askew, the pendulum drifts to a halt, and the chimes fall silent. A precious harmony is broken, but the earth stops neither its rotation nor its course around the sun. Time does not stop. Birds chirp in the morning and darkness later descends no matter what happens in the living room.

The clock is a sacrament of the passage of time, a way to note the movement of one day into the next, a method of location in the otherwise uncharted ocean whose two horizons are the past and the future. Mariners are fond of saying, especially when the ship unexpectedly runs aground, that the chart is not the sea; similarly, the clock is not time.

I propose this image for our new and urgent discussions about religion. In America, a religious divide has suddenly emerged as politically decisive, and in the world, religion is a runaway engine of violence. A fanatic fringe of Islam asserts its doctrine by joining suicide to murder in Allah's name. In Gaza and the West Bank, some hypernationalist religious Jews stake claims to land with God as guarantor -- disastrous consequences to Palestinians and Israel both be damned. Similarly, America's war in Iraq has evolved into a two-sided holy war, even if only one side explicitly defines it as such.

Meanwhile, mainstream churches waste themselves in conflicts over sexual identity, the new meanings of marriage, and mysteries of the medical frontier -- arguments in which "God's will" is invoked as if sacred texts elucidated the biology of genetics, postsexual reproduction, open-ended lifespan. The "religious right" fervently seeks to impose its definitions of the social good on the devout and the indifferent alike. "Bright" nonbelievers, in turn, match the absolutism of the zealots of faith with absolute rejection.

Such ferocity of human arguments over God, whether in affirmation or denial, reflects a terrible forgetfulness. Religion is to God what the clock is to time. Religion participates in the mystery of what it represents but does not embody that mystery. Not even Christianity, with its self-understanding as a religion of the incarnate Word, does more than enshrine that Word in symbol and sacrament. Indeed, "Word" is the clue, since all religion, however infinite the object of its worship, remains bound by the finitude of language -- and language always falls short of its purpose. That truth applies to religion and science both. Words are to what they aim to express as the clock is to time. That is why silence, too, is a mode of worship. And it is why, also, the language of science always leaves room for what is not known.

When I come down in the morning and see the weights of the clock near the bottom of the case again, my heart sinks at the evidence of the passage of time. But the clock is not the motor of such transience. Arguing over religion is like arguing over a clock, which is precisely what happens, for example, when Darwinists and creationists clash. Their great fight is less over the deep mystery of being than over which timeframe to use in measuring it.

We humans naturally reach toward transcendence, seeking symbols with which to make it present. Religion and science are ways of doing this. So are poetry and music. So, for that matter, is clockmaking. Yet transcendence, by definition, transcends. We should be modest, therefore, in the claims we make on the absolute. And equally modest in the claims we make on one another in its name.

Article Link

Calaca Press

Check out the spoken word/music releases at the independent (and anti-war) Calaca Press. You can sample some of their works in MP3 form here:

Calaca MP3s

Also check out their recent print anthology La Calaca Review

Review of James Ridgeway's New Book It's All For Sale

Could be a good resource for those of curious about the Silence of Lambswool Cardigan:

Raw Deals
Mathhew Fleischer-Black
Village Voice

An excerpt:

The aluminum pan you cooked your egg in this morning began as a bauxite deposit in a mountain in Jamaica. The cinnamon on your toast was once the bark of a tree in Sri Lanka—not a cinnamon tree, either. The cut flowers on your table? From Colombia.

Start questioning where everyday things come from, James Ridgeway tells us in It's All for Sale, and often you will get a surprisingly simple answer. Behind the scenes of it all, he says, a small group of private companies governs trade of the world's materials. Five companies control the flow of petroleum. Four corporations reign over the grain trade. Three each dominate timber, uranium, and tea. Two lead the way on fresh water and coffee, while one each runs diamonds and cigarettes.

Ridgeway, the veteran Washington correspondent for the Voice, traces the journey made by many of the natural materials we depend on. The book is organized by resource. For each item, he sums up how its market developed, where in the world it comes from, and who controls the business now.


Entire Article

Friday, December 17, 2004

Martin Heidegger: On Teaching to "Let" Learn

"Teaching is even more difficult than learning. We know that; but we rarely think about it. And why is teaching more difficult than learning? Not because the teacher must have a larger store of information, and have it always ready. Teaching is more difficult than learning because what teaching calls for is this: to let learn. The real teacher, in fact, lets nothing else be learned than—learning… The teacher is far ahead of his apprentices in this alone, that he has still far more to learn than they—he has to learn to let them learn. The teacher must be capable of being more teachable than the apprentices."

---Martin Heidegger


Quoted in Salvatori, Mariolina Rizzi and Patricia Donahue. The Elements (and Pleasures) of Difficulty. NY: Pearson Longman, 2005: viii.

Thursday, December 16, 2004

Philip K. Dick: On the Manipulation of Reality

(courtesy of American Samizdat rebel scum since 2001!)

"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."

--Philip K. Dick

Nancy Duff Campbell and Joan Entmacher: Not Just Your Mom's Retirement

Not Just Your Mom's Retirement
Nancy Duff Campbell and Joan Entmacher
Tom Paine

Did you know that children, disabled workers and families of prematurely deceased workers all collect Social Security benefits? The program truly serves the role of government safety net as it was intended—lending a hand to Americans in their time of need. The personal investment accounts idea being floated by the White House and its surrogates would effectively shred that safety net. Duff Campbell and Entmacher of the National Women's Law Center show how.

Entire Article

Dalkey Archive Press

Dalkey archive and John O'Brien are legends in the independent book publishing world. Check out the history of this press. The pay is not much to start, but for someone seeking to learn this is a good opportunity. O'Brien reminded me of the modern giants of independent publishing who were fearless in their desire to publish the greatest works available (of course what they viewed as the greatest works--but that is the point), a wonderful antidote of publishing according to the bottom line...

If you want to know more about this job, or the place where it is located, feel free to ask as I did my grad work there and worked in the same offices for the Center for Contemporary Literature.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Job Openings at Dalkey Archive Press

Assistant Editor:

Duties will include: copy-editing all Dalkey Archive books; editing CONTEXT magazine; editing the book review section of the REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY FICTION; and proofreading all publications, among other things. We are looking for an ambitious person who can thrive in a creative, fast-paced environment and enjoys challenging work.

Marketing Assistant:

Duties will include: writing press releases; working with our UK distributor and publicity outlets and stores in London; contacting U.S. bookstores; and working on the Dalkey Archive website, among other things. We are looking for an ambitious person who can thrive in a creative, fast-paced environment and enjoys challenging work.

Job Location: The Center for Book Culture/Dalkey Archive Press is located at Illinois State University.

Salary: Starting salary for either position is $24,000, with room for advancement.

Start Date: Applications must be received by December 20th and the start date for the position is January 2005.

Preferences: Preference will be given to candidates with bookstore experience and an extensive familiarity with Dalkey Archive Press titles.

To Apply: Send complete résumé with full work history (including dates of employment and salary history), a cover letter explaining your interest in publishing and Dalkey Archive Press, and what in your background would be useful to working here, an unofficial transcript if you have graduated from college within the past 5 years, and two nonfiction (preferably critical) writing samples. Candidates will not be considered without having submitted all of these materials.

Send materials via e-mail or by regular mail to:

John O¹Brien, Publisher
Dalkey Archive Press
ISU Campus Box 8905
Normal, IL 61790-8905

obrien@dalkeyarchive.com

The 23rd Sigh

(courtesy Julie Barbour)

The 23rd Sigh

Bush is my shepherd; I dwell in want.
He maketh logs to be cut down in national forests.
He leadeth trucks into the still wilderness.
He restoreth my fears.
He leadeth me in the paths of international disgrace for his ego's sake.
Yea, though I walk through the valley of pollution and war, I will find no
exit, for thou art in office.
Thy tax cuts for the rich and thy media control, they discomfort me.
Thou preparest an agenda of deception in the presence of thy religion.
Thou anointest my head with foreign oil.
My health insurance runneth out.
Surely megalomania and false patriotism shall follow me all the days of thy
term.
And my jobless child shall dwell in my basement forever.

Critical Art Ensemble: Performative Critics of Corporate Bio-Technology Practices

(thanks to Danny Meyer who sent me an email about CAE current fund raising to fight the government--reminding me to update this post)

US Government's Attacks on Performance Group Critical Art Ensemble

US Government Paranoia in Action: FBI Abducts Artist, Seizes Art

Park, Paula. “Buffalo Case Highlights MTAs: Material transfer agreements can be misunderstood or considered an annoyance, say officials.” The Scientist (August 9, 2004)

Critical Art Ensemble's Online Performative Critiques:

Critical Art Ensemble. “Cult of the New Eve.” (2004: Online Visual and Textual Project)

---. “Flesh Machine.” (2004: Online Visual and Textual Project)

---. “Gen Terra: Transgenic Solutions for a Greener World.” (2004: Online Visual and Textual Project)

---. “Society For Reproductive Anachronisms.” (2004: Online Visual and Textual Project)

---. “The Therapeutic State.” (2004: Online Visual and Textual Project)

Critical Art Ensemble, Beatriz da Costa and Claire Pentecost. Contestational Biology.” (2004: Online Visual and Textual Project)

Critical Art Ensemble, Beatriz da Costa and Shyh-shiun. “Free Range Grain.” (2004: Online Visual and Textual Project)

Books by Critical Art Ensemble Available Online:

Critical Art Ensemble. Digital Resistance: Explorations in Tactical Media. (Autonomedia, 2001)

---. Electronic Civil Disobedience & Other Unpopular Ideas. (Autonomedia, 1996)

---. The Electronic Disturbance (Autonomedia, 2000)

---. Flesh Machine: Cyborgs, Designer Babies and New Eugenic Consciousness. (Autonomedia, 1998)

---. Molecular Invasion. (Autonomedia, 2002)

Action Site Set Up to Help Defend Critical Art Ensemble

Critical Art Ensemble Defense Fund

Kentucky Bloggers: Help Kids in Kentucky

(courtesy of el Oso who comes from the land where the sun always shines)

I sent an email to check this out--any other Kentucky bloggers interested in volunteering?

Bloggers: Help Kids in Kentucky

Web of Influence and Left 2 Right

Drezner, Daniel and Henry Farrell. Web of Influence Foreign Policy November/December 2004 (Every day, millions of online diarists, or “bloggers,” share their opinions with a global audience. Drawing upon the content of the international media and the World Wide Web, they weave together an elaborate network with agenda-setting power on issues ranging from human rights in China to the U.S. occupation of Iraq. What began as a hobby is evolving into a new medium that is changing the landscape for journalists and policymakers alike.)

Glenn, Joshua. New Blog; Old Tricks The Boston Globe (December 12, 2004): (About the collective academic blog Left2Right which includes Rorty and Appiah amongst its members. Dedicated to reaching across the left-right barrier and developing a conversation of ideas)

Paul Krugman: The Death of Horatio Alger

Anyone see Cheney yesterday insisting that congress, for the economic good of the country, must make the tax cuts for the wealthy (of course he doesn't say "for the wealthy") permanent?

The Death of Horatio Alger
Paul Krugman
Alternet

Our political leaders are doing everything they can to fortify class inequality, while denouncing anyone who complains--or even points out what is happening -- as a practitioner of "class warfare."

The Death of Horatio Alger

Wednesday, December 15, 2004

Food Not Bombs: Phoenix Park in Lexington, KY--Tomorrow

Last week Wednesday Parks and Recreation and the Health Department showed up and advised us that we would need to get a permit in order to share free food with people at Phoenix Park. We have decided that we will not pursue a permit since food is a right and not a privilege. Anyone is welcome to come and share our food. Food Not Bombs invites you to come out tomorrow and share a meal with us. The Health Department and Parks and Rec. will more than likely be showing up in order to deter our attempt to share food with each other. Please come out and show your support
tomorrow at 5:30pm at Phoenix Park

I hope to see you tomorrow,

Patrick Garnett

About FNB:
Food Not Bombs is one of the fastest growing revolutionary movements active today and is gaining momentum. There are hundreds of autonomous chapters sharing free vegetarian food with hungry people and protesting war and poverty throughout the Americas, Europe, Asia and Australia.

The first group was formed in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1980 by anti-nuclear activists. Food Not Bombs is an all volunteer organization dedicated to nonviolence. Food Not Bombs has no formal leaders and strives to include everyone in its decision making process. Each group recovers food that would otherwise be thrown out and makes fresh hot vegetarian meals that are served in city parks to anyone without restriction. The groups also serve free vegetarian meals at protests and other events. The San Francisco Chapter has been arrested over 1,000 times in an effort
to silence its protest against the Mayor's anti- homeless policies. Amnesty
International states it may adopt those Food Not Bombs volunteers that are imprisoned as "Prisoners of Conscience" and will work for their unconditional release.

Food Not Bombs works in coalition with groups like Earth First!, The Leonard Peltier Defense Committee, Anarchist Black Cross, the IWW, Homes Not Jails, Anti Racist Action, In Defense of Animals, the Free Radio Movement and other organizations on the cutting edge of positive social change and resistance to the new global austerity program. One collective publishes a movement wide newsletter called A Food Not Bombs Menu. Another hosts FNB News where you can learn more about the Food Not Bombs community. Food Not Bombs Publishing in Takoma Park, Maryland publishes books like On Conflict and Consensus which has been an important guide for group democracy. We hope you will join us in taking direct action towards creating a world free from domination, coercion and violence. Food is a right, not a privilege.

Tuesday, December 14, 2004

Companies Rapidly Cutting Health Benefits

Companies Rapidly Cutting Health Benefits
By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer
Yahoo

Many companies are dropping their promise of health benefits for future retirees, who now might have to stay on the job longer and rely on government health care in their old age.

Eight percent of employers with at least 1,000 workers said they had eliminated subsidized retiree health benefits for some workers this year, and 11 percent more said they probably would do so next year, according to a study released Tuesday by the benefits consulting firm Hewitt Associates and the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation.

Most of those affected were newly hired, but some companies said the change applied to workers who had been on the payroll longer.

The number of companies that offer health coverage to retirees has been on the decline for 15 years.

But among those that continue to subsidize retiree coverage, the move to treat current and former workers differently reflects a desire to leave health benefits in place for those who have already retired despite several consecutive years of double-digit increases in health care costs.

Since 2000, more than 100 large employers have chosen this path.

Some have cut out subsidies but have told employees they can continue coverage under company health plans after they retire, a much cheaper option than seeking health insurance elsewhere.

"Retiree health care coverage is kind of a slowly vanishing species," Kaiser president Drew Altman said.

The prospect of losing health coverage in retirement is troubling particularly to people who are considering changing jobs or who want to retire between the ages of 55 and 64. Younger retirees can find it difficult to afford health insurance when they can't get it from their employers.

Medicare, the government health program for older and disabled Americans, kicks in at age 65. Its benefits typically have been less generous than those offered by employers, mainly because the workplace plans cover prescription drugs. Medicare's drug insurance program begins in 2006.

The employer plans, however, are asking retirees to pay more of their health costs through higher insurance premiums and larger co-pays for doctor visits and prescription medicines.

People who retire in 2004 face premiums about 25 percent higher than those who retired last year, according to the survey of 333 companies, which was conducted between May and September.

Most large employers said they will maintain prescription drug benefits for retirees after the Medicare drug program begins in 2006, the study said.

The fate of retirees with employer-sponsored drug benefits was a major consideration of the authors of last year's Medicare prescription drug law.

To keep more employers from dropping coverage, the law includes up to $88 billion over 10 years in tax-free subsidies to companies that offer prescription benefits that are at least the equal of Medicare's.

In 1991, 80 percent of firms employing 1,000 or more workers offered health coverage to retirees. By 2003, the number had fallen to 57 percent, Hewitt said. When looking at companies with at least 200 employees, the number is 38 percent, Kaiser said.

Roughly 15 million retirees receive health care coverage from former employers. About 3 million are 55 to 64. The rest are eligible for Medicare, Altman said.

The new survey, conducted before issuance of final Medicare regulations about the drug benefit, found that just 8 percent of employers said they would drop retirees' drug benefits in the program's first year.

Frank McArdle, manager of Hewitt's research office in Washington, said the early response from employers is good news. But he cautioned that decisions about 2007 and beyond would depend on the regulations, the design of Medicare drug plans devised by private insurers and by costs.

Article Link



Many employers are passing more of the expenses to their retired employees, the survey of 333 large companies showed. (AP Graphic)

Michael Moore: It's Time To Stop Being Hit...

(courtesy of the poet Julie Barbour)

I'm confused by the simpering, apologetic attitude of some Democrats and why many think that they will regain power if they move to the right--perhaps the always provocative Moore is on to something here:

It's Time To Stop being Hit...

Paul Tough: The "Acting White" Myth

From the New York Times an explanation of the resurgence and uses of this social myth:

The "Acting White" Myth

Jehangir S. Pocha: The Geopolitics of Oil

From New Perspectives Quarterly an analysis of new economic battle lines being drawn in the global struggle for oil:

The Geopolitics of Oil: It's Now China and India vs. the U.S.

Evan Derkacz: The Sinclair Propaganda Machine

The Sinclair Propaganda Machine
Evan Derkacz
Alternet

Owned by Bush-backers, an emboldened Sinclair Broadcasting is pushing forward with its right-wing agenda. It's time to push back.

The Sinclair Propaganda Machine

More on Sinclair and Propaganda:

Free Press Report: More on the Sinclair Backlash

Red Harvest on the Sinclair Group

Bill Moyers: The Media, Politics and Censorship

Thomas Frank: Architecture of a New Consensus

Sinclair Broadcasting: Connecting the Dots

Sinclair Stations Boycott Nightline Broadcast of the Names/Faces of US Soldiers Killed in Iraq

Sunday, December 12, 2004

Spontaneous Arising: Star Chamber Justice

Can you be fired from your job with no explanation other than you are threat to national security--without a full disclosure of what your threat may consist of and where these sources come from? Check out Michael Hawkin's post at Spontaneous Arising for the story of one couple's unexplained firing:

Star Chamber Justice

The possible abuses of this government/business threat to working people boggles my mind.